KPR Managements Pty Ltd

Licence 10025091 91 schemes 1,625 lots 42 suburbs

KPR Managements Pty Ltd manages 91 strata schemes totalling 1,625 lots across NSW. It has a broad geographic spread across 42 suburbs, with Fairfield as its largest market (18%). AGM compliance is strong at 92%, placing it among the best-performing managers on this metric. There are 4 recorded tribunal or court decisions involving its schemes (4 in the Supreme Court). Of these, 4 resulted in orders being made.

#156
of 459 Managers
91
Total Schemes
1,625
Total Lots
42
Suburbs Served
17.9
Avg Lots / Scheme
92%
AGM Compliance (avg 70%)

Portfolio Profile

Lot Types

Residential 1,609 (99%) Commercial 16 (1%)

Scheme Size Distribution

37
1-10
39
11-25
11
26-50
3
51-100
1
100+

Distribution of schemes by total lot count. Average scheme size: 17.9 lots. Most schemes fall in the 11–25 lot range, typical of small apartment blocks.

Portfolio Age

3
1960s
20
1970s
14
1980s
21
1990s
15
2000s
11
2010s
7
2020s

Schemes by registration decade. Oldest scheme registered 1965, newest 2024.

Suburb Coverage

Suburb Schemes Lots % of Portfolio Market Share
Fairfield 2165 16 302 18% 6.7%
Bankstown 2200 8 259 9% 1.9%
Wakeley 2176 7 230 8% 36.8%
Cabramatta 2166 6 81 7% 1.9%
Lakemba 2195 5 54 5% 1.4%
Greenacre 2190 4 75 4% 2.4%
Carramar 2163 4 61 4% 8.5%
Riverwood 2210 2 42 2% 1.8%
Macquarie Fields 2564 2 36 2% 1.7%
Beverly Hills 2209 2 25 2% 2.2%
Penshurst 2222 2 24 2% 0.8%
Wiley Park 2195 2 17 2% 1.0%
Campsie 2194 2 18 2% 0.4%
Edmondson Park 2174 1 105 1% 3.2%
Canley Vale 2166 1 20 1% 1.4%
Barden Ridge 2234 1 19 1% 5.9%
Merrylands 2160 1 18 1% 0.2%
Fairfield Heights 2165 1 18 1% 2.9%
Canley Heights 2166 1 17 1% 5.6%
Prestons 2170 1 17 1% 0.6%
Casula 2170 1 15 1% 0.8%
Mount Pritchard 2170 1 13 1% 5.6%
Fairfield West 2165 1 13 1% 8.3%
Bass Hill 2197 1 13 1% 1.8%
Punchbowl 2196 1 10 1% 0.4%
Toongabbie 2146 1 10 1% 0.7%
South Wentworthville 2145 1 10 1% 1.4%
Rosehill 2142 1 10 1% 1.7%
Liverpool 2170 1 10 1% 0.2%
Wetherill Park 2164 1 9 1% 1.0%
Belmore 2192 1 8 1% 0.5%
Glenfield 2167 1 8 1% 1.6%
Bardwell Valley 2207 1 8 1% 3.7%
Blacktown 2148 1 8 1% 0.3%
Campbelltown 2560 1 7 1% 0.5%
Miller 2168 1 6 1% 25.0%
Moorebank 2170 1 6 1% 0.9%
Rydalmere 2116 1 5 1% 1.8%
Smithfield 2164 1 5 1% 1.1%
Chester Hill 2162 1 5 1% 1.9%
Old Guildford 2161 1 5 1% 12.5%
Revesby 2212 1 3 1% 0.5%

Contact & Reviews

NSW Licence (Verified)

Licensee KPR Managements Pty Ltd
Status Current
Licence Number 10025091
Type Property - Corporation
Granted 2014-08-28
Expires 2026-08-27
ACN 600389866
Registered Address FAIRFIELD NSW 2165
Trading As
Ace Body Corporate Management Canley Heights
(02) 9316 8777
170-180 Bourke Rd, Alexandria NSW 2015, Australia
3.6 ★
48 Google reviews

Recent Reviews

2 ★ franco zuzaniuk 14 Feb 2026
“This company feels more like a call center than a legitimate recruitment agency. They make promises they don’t keep — in my case, they said they would cover transportation costs but never did. They seem to have no real idea who they work for, and that confusion extends to the people they hire....”
1 ★ Juan Carlos 28 Jan 2026
“They are scammers. I worked with them and it's been four months and they still haven't paid me. According to them, my payment is registered but I have nothing in the bank. I spent eight hours working in construction, having a hard time at all. I don't recommend this company, they are...”
1 ★ Michael Wild 20 Dec 2025
“No communication they just drop the ball . Also I am owed money for work . There’s no support or any contact”
1 ★ tjr OP 27 Jan 2026
“Beware, they make you work and then they don't pay you!!!”
5 ★ Anthony Makafana 30 Oct 2022
“KPR Recruitment has been able to successfully get myself work. They catered to whatever it was I needed for work etc. Relations with agents and workers are amazing! Always making sure the worker is happy along with the client so everything runs smooth, safe and sound. All in all I’d consider KPR...”

Tribunal & Court History

4
Total Cases
4
Supreme Court
1.1
Adverse per 100 Schemes
4.4
Total per 100 Schemes

4 cases since 2021. Of these, 1 resulted in substantive orders. The remaining 3 were dismissed, withdrawn, settled, or involved the OC as applicant.

4
Orders Made 4
$17,600 Costs Ordered
Supreme Court Orders Made Medium [2025] NSWSC 1059 2025-09-19
The Owners Corporation sought default judgment against Mr. Zhang, the developer, for defects. The court found that default judgment was not appropriate and extended the time for Mr. Zhang to comply with a previous order. The court dismissed the Owners Corporation's motion, with the developer's solicitor ordered to pay the costs.
CIVIL PROCEDURE – default judgment – procedural imbroglio – non-compliance with self-executing order – mistake by defendant’s solicitor – whether Court has power to extend time for compliance – where no ongoing prejudice to plaintiff and defendant’s solicitor submits to personal costs order
Before
Peden J
Hearing
19 September 2025
File Numbers
2018/382960
Matched Strata Plans
SP93543
Parties
Owners Corporation v Developer
Representation
Counsel: A G Rogers (Plaintiff) M Condon SC with P Sharp (Defendant) Solicitors: Alexander Richards Lawyers (Plaintiff) MPM Legal (Defendant)
Orders
See [28]

Read full decision →

Supreme Court Orders Made Medium [2025] NSWSC 571 2025-06-04
The Owners Corporation sued the developer for building defects, and the developer disputed the rescission of a settlement deed. The tribunal found the Owners Corporation could proceed with the building defects claim, but only in relation to common property and decided the deed was effectively rescinded. The tribunal ordered the case to go to a referee.
Building defects
BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION – Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) – statutory warranty – proceedings for breach – whether proceedings were commenced by plaintiff owners corporation within the warranty period – whether effect of interim occupation certificate was to cause warranty period to commence –...
Before
Stevenson J
Hearing
22 to 25 March 2021, 2, 3, and 10 June 2021; 15 and 27 May 2025; further written submissions 28 May 2025 and 2 June 2025
File Numbers
2018/382960
Matched Strata Plans
SP93543
Parties
Owners Corporation v Developer
Representation
Counsel: A G Rogers (22-25 March, 2-3, 10 June 2021 and 15 May 2025) and D S Allen (27 May 2025) (Plaintiff) P Moorhouse / J Tsang (22-25 March, 2-3, 10 June 2021) and M Klooster (15 and 27 May...
Orders
Plaintiff entitled to rescind Deed of Settlement; plaintiff commenced proceedings within the warranty period; plaintiff entitled to damages for defective works within the common property

Read full decision →

Supreme Court Orders Made Medium Adverse [2021] NSWSC 360 2021-04-09
The applicant sought to recover costs incurred due to an adjournment. The tribunal decided that the respondent had to pay $17,600 in costs thrown away by the adjournment. The reason was the late service of an expert report.
$17,600 Costs (Respondent)
COSTS – costs thrown away by the adjournment – whether such costs confined to costs incurred prior to the adjournment – whether such costs include costs not yet incurred but which would not have been incurred but for the adjournment
Before
Stevenson J
Hearing
22 to 25 March 2021; written submissions 30 & 31 March 2021 and 8 April 2021
File Numbers
2018/382960
Matched Strata Plans
SP93543
Parties
Third Party v Third Party
Representation
Counsel: A G Rogers (Plaintiff) P Moorehouse with J Tsang (Defendant) Solicitors: Alexander Richards Lawyers (Plaintiff) MPM Legal (Defendant)
Orders
Costs thrown away by adjournment specified as a gross sum at $17,600

Read full decision →

Supreme Court Orders Made Medium [2021] NSWSC 277 2021-03-22
The Owners Corporation, a strata scheme, alleged building defects against the developer, Mr. Zhang. Zhang attempted to withdraw admissions, which the tribunal refused. The tribunal's decision prevented the withdrawal, allowing the case to proceed without an adjournment.
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to withdraw admissions – admission in List Response that plaintiff owners corporation was entitled to benefit of statutory warranties – further admissions that defendant entered into a contract with the builder of the strata development and that the builder...
Before
Stevenson J
Hearing
22 March 2021
File Numbers
2018/382960
Matched Strata Plans
SP93543
Parties
Owners Corporation v Developer
Representation
Counsel: A G Rogers (Plaintiff) P Moorehouse with J Tsang (Defendant) Solicitors: Alexander Richards Lawyers (Plaintiff) Marando Solicitors (Defendant)
Orders
Leave to withdraw admissions refused

Read full decision →

Data sourced from the NSW StrataHub public register. KPR Managements Pty Ltd is 1 of 459 strata managers tracked by Compare Strata. Browse all managers or find managers by suburb.