Dynamic Property Services Pty Ltd

Licence 280243 277 schemes 27,226 lots 67 suburbs

Dynamic Property Services Pty Ltd manages 277 strata schemes totalling 27,226 lots across NSW. With an average of 98 lots per scheme, it specialises in larger buildings — more than double the state-wide average of 20 lots. It has a broad geographic spread across 67 suburbs, with Crackenback as its largest market (13%). AGM compliance is 73%, roughly in line with the state-wide average of 70%. Its schemes have been involved in 16 tribunal and court decisions since 2021 (7 at NCAT, 7 in the Supreme Court, 1 in the Court of Appeal), one of the higher litigation counts and rates among NSW managers. Of these, 11 resulted in orders being made and 5 were dismissed.

#52
of 459 Managers
277
Total Schemes
27,226
Total Lots
67
Suburbs Served
98.3
Avg Lots / Scheme
73%
AGM Compliance (avg 70%)

Portfolio Profile

Lot Types

Residential 23,665 (87%) Commercial 1,435 (5%) Utility 1,814 (7%) Other 279 (1%)

Scheme Size Distribution

36
1-10
42
11-25
38
26-50
52
51-100
109
100+

Distribution of schemes by total lot count. Average scheme size: 98.3 lots. A significant share of schemes have 100+ lots, indicating a focus on large apartment buildings.

Portfolio Age

11
1960s
12
1970s
19
1980s
90
1990s
90
2000s
43
2010s
12
2020s

Schemes by registration decade. Oldest scheme registered 1962, newest 2024.

Suburb Coverage

Suburb Schemes Lots % of Portfolio Market Share
Crackenback 2627 35 6,720 13% 100.0%
Sydney 2000 24 1,411 9% 4.7%
Erskineville 2043 15 1,985 5% 20.0%
Surry Hills 2010 13 1,412 5% 5.1%
Pyrmont 2009 11 1,443 4% 9.7%
Botany 2019 10 1,776 4% 6.3%
Dawes Point 2000 9 163 3% 47.4%
Marsfield 2122 8 752 3% 6.1%
Darlinghurst 2010 8 559 3% 2.3%
Jindabyne 2627 7 120 3% 2.3%
Chippendale 2008 6 1,138 2% 7.6%
Potts Point 2011 6 170 2% 2.9%
Newington 2127 5 685 2% 21.7%
Wollstonecraft 2065 5 485 2% 1.7%
Newcastle 2300 5 339 2% 3.0%
Wollongong 2500 5 233 2% 0.6%
Little Bay 2036 5 266 2% 8.9%
Millers Point 2000 5 158 2% 11.9%
Woolooware 2230 4 660 1% 2.8%
Camperdown 2050 4 592 1% 4.1%
Bondi Beach 2026 4 76 1% 0.8%
Neutral Bay 2089 4 89 1% 0.8%
North Sydney 2060 3 780 1% 1.2%
Edgecliff 2027 3 612 1% 3.9%
Ryde 2112 3 272 1% 0.7%
Wentworth Point 2127 3 261 1% 5.2%
Paddington 2021 3 161 1% 2.9%
Woollahra 2025 3 84 1% 1.6%
Darling Point 2027 3 48 1% 1.2%
Leichhardt 2040 3 29 1% 1.5%
Tamarama 2026 3 14 1% 3.6%
Double Bay 2028 3 9 1% 1.4%
Elizabeth Bay 2011 2 181 1% 1.3%
Rhodes 2138 2 298 1% 2.2%
Manly 2095 2 290 1% 0.3%
Greenwich 2065 2 156 1% 2.6%
Glebe 2037 2 126 1% 1.6%
Mosman 2088 2 126 1% 0.2%
Bondi Junction 2022 2 151 1% 1.0%
Waverton 2060 2 73 1% 1.6%
Pagewood 2035 2 82 1% 14.3%
Randwick 2031 2 35 1% 0.2%
Rushcutters Bay 2011 2 46 1% 2.3%
Kingsford 2032 2 19 1% 0.9%
Rose Bay 2029 2 23 1% 0.4%
St Leonards 2065 2 20 1% 2.2%
Haymarket 2000 1 756 0% 1.8%
Macquarie Park 2113 1 412 0% 0.7%
Kirrawee 2232 1 209 0% 0.3%
Dee Why 2099 1 161 0% 0.2%
Hillsdale 2036 1 116 0% 0.5%
Chatswood 2067 1 108 0% 0.3%
Waterloo 2017 1 69 0% 0.8%
Coogee 2034 1 50 0% 0.1%
Liberty Grove 2138 1 28 0% 7.7%
Crows Nest 2065 1 27 0% 0.6%
Oxford Falls 2100 1 25 0% 100.0%
Artarmon 2064 1 23 0% 0.6%
Bellevue Hill 2023 1 22 0% 0.2%
Newtown 2042 1 22 0% 0.7%
Milsons Point 2061 1 20 0% 1.7%
Vaucluse 2030 1 15 0% 0.4%
Point Piper 2027 1 14 0% 0.9%
Watsons Bay 2030 1 6 0% 4.0%
Maroubra 2035 1 6 0% 0.2%
North Bondi 2026 1 6 0% 0.3%
Bronte 2024 1 3 0% 0.6%

Contact & Reviews

NSW Licence (Verified)

Licensee Dynamic Property Services Pty Ltd
Status Current
Licence Number 280243
Type Property - Corporation
Granted 1989-02-01
Expires 2028-01-31
ACN 002006760
Registered Address SYDNEY NSW 2000
(02) 9267 6334
level 27/66 Goulburn St, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia
3.7 ★
231 Google reviews

Recent Reviews

5 ★ yaz yazbek 08 Dec 2025
“I’ve been using Dynamic Property Services for well over 25 years, and they have consistently delivered outstanding service. They manage all of my properties, and throughout the years they have always been assertive, proactive, and extremely reliable. Their team communicates clearly and responds...”
5 ★ Kim Morris 03 Dec 2025
“Dynamic Property Services are a pleasure to work with. They’re efficient, ensuring that everything runs smoothly and on time. Communication is outstanding – you always know exactly where you stand, with clear updates and no surprises. Their team knows their stuff, bringing expertise and...”
5 ★ Anthony Bastic 07 Dec 2025
“The body corporate of our apartment block in Sydney engaged Dynamic Property Services as the Strata Mgt company to service our building. We have found them to provide exceptional Service. The team who manage our BC, Sara Rohani and Ro Dobbin are excellent. I thoroughly recommend DPS if you're...”
1 ★ Trisha Cotterill 02 Feb 2026
“Incredibly frustrating to deal with. They are incompetent at doing basic tasks like emailing levy notices and meeting minutes to apartment owners. They have emailed me bills that belong to other people, and have also CC'd people I do not know onto levy emails for my apartment (which is a data...”
5 ★ Suzanne Kerr 01 Dec 2025
“I’ve had multiple interactions with Toula from Dynamic Property Services and every experience has been consistently positive. Toula brings a wealth of knowledge to her role and it really shows in the way she handles every enquiry — always calm, clear, and resolution-focused. She’s dedicated,...”

Tribunal & Court History

16
Total Cases
7
NCAT
7
Supreme Court
1
Court of Appeal
2.5
Adverse per 100 Schemes
5.8
Total per 100 Schemes

16 cases since 2021. Of these, 7 resulted in substantive orders. The remaining 9 were dismissed, withdrawn, settled, or involved the OC as applicant.

11
5
Orders Made 11 Dismissed 5
$157,977 Total Compensation
Repair & maintenance 5 Common property 3 Building defects 3 Parking & access 1 Fire safety 1
Supreme Court Orders Made Medium [2025] NSWSC 1289 2025-11-03
The owners corporation brought proceedings seeking declaratory relief which was dismissed by the tribunal. The tribunal decided that the owners corporation should pay the developer's costs because the proceedings were unnecessary and the issues could be addressed in existing proceedings. The tribunal found that there was no good reason to depart from the usual costs order.
Building defects
COSTS — r 42.20(1), Uniform Civil Procedure Rules (2005) — owners of high-rise development bring four proceedings against developers, builder and others for building defects — fifth proceeding against developer dismissed as abuse of process — whether defendants entitled to costs of proceedings —...
Before
Rees J
Hearing
On the papers; submissions 24 October 2025
File Numbers
2025/48263
Matched Strata Plans
SP87881
Parties
Owners Corporation v Developer
Representation
Counsel: F Hicks SC / SC Ipp (Plaintiffs) DT Miller SC / M Sheldon (Defendants) Solicitors: HWL Ebsworth (Plaintiffs) Minter Ellison (Defendants)
Orders
Costs order made.

Read full decision →

Supreme Court Dismissed Low [2025] NSWSC 1073 2025-10-10
The Owners sought a declaration regarding the method of rectifying building defects. The tribunal dismissed the proceedings, finding that the issues could be addressed within existing building-defect proceedings. The tribunal reasoned that this would avoid duplication and the potential for inconsistent rulings.
Building defects
SUMMARY DISPOSAL — owners of high-rise development bring four proceedings against developers, builder and others for building defects — building work rectification order issued to developers under Residential Apartment Buildings (Compliance and Enforcement Powers) Act 2020 (NSW) — owners...
Before
Rees J
Hearing
28 August 2025; last submissions 2 September 2025
File Numbers
2025/48263
Matched Strata Plans
SP87881
Parties
Owners Corporation v Developer
Representation
Counsel: F Hicks SC / SC Ipp (Plaintiffs) DT Miller SC / M Sheldon (Defendants) Solicitors: HWL Ebsworth (Plaintiffs) Minter Ellison (Defendants)
Orders
Proceedings dismissed.

Read full decision →

Supreme Court Orders Made Medium [2025] NSWSC 935 2025-08-18
The Owners Corporation and the defendants had a mediation session that was aborted. The defendants sought a gross sum costs order, but the tribunal dismissed this. The tribunal ordered the Owners Corporation pay the defendants' costs of the mediation, subject to assessment.
COSTS — Application for costs to be fixed in a gross sum — Appropriateness of gross sum costs order – Sufficiency of evidence required for gross sum costs orders – Where parties scheduled to participate in mediation – Where mediation terminated upon failure of plaintiff’s personal representative...
Before
Peden J
Hearing
On the papers
File Numbers
2022/00172260
Matched Strata Plans
SP93105
Parties
Owners Corporation v Developer
Representation
Counsel: NYH Li (Plaintiff) Solicitors: Kerin Benson Lawyers (Plaintiff) Colin Biggers & Paisley (Defendants)
Orders
See [26]

Read full decision →

NCAT Dismissed Low [2025] NSWCATCD 70 2025-07-14
The applicant sought to have the tribunal uphold the original orders which required the Owners Corporation to undertake repairs to the applicant's lot. The tribunal declined to grant the Owners Corporation an extension of time to complete the work. The Owners Corporation was ordered to pay the applicant's costs of the application.
CIVIL PROCEDURE – Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act s 41 – extension of time for compliance with orders – applicable principles
Before
D Robertson, Principal Member
Hearing
On the papers, last submissions received 1 July 2025
File Numbers
2024/00071125
Matched Strata Plans
SP2661
Parties
Lot Owner v Owners Corporation
Representation
Counsel: A Rizk (Applicant) Solicitors: Sachs Gerace Lawyers (Applicant) Mills Oakley (Respondent)
Orders
(1) Pursuant to s 50 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) a hearing in respect of the respondent’s Miscellaneous Matters Application filed on 30 May 2025 is dispensed with. (2) The Miscellaneous Matters Application is dismissed. (3) The respondent is to pay the applicant’s costs of the Miscellaneous Matters Application as agreed or assessed.

Read full decision →

Court of Appeal Dismissed Low [2025] NSWCA 35 2025-03-31
The applicant appealed a decision about land tax liability, arguing an exemption applied because they intended to live in a new unit replacing the original lots. The court dismissed the appeal, holding that the exemption applied to the original lots, which were not intended as a residence, and that the new unit was materially different. Costs were not awarded.
TAXES AND DUTIES — land tax — liability —principal place of residence — unoccupied land concession — where multiple strata lots are claimed as principal place of residence — where strata lots are intended to be consolidated into a single lot — where taxable land does not exactly correspond to...
Before
Mitchelmore JA at [1]; McHugh JA at [77]; Griffiths AJA at [78]
Hearing
22 November 2024
File Numbers
2024/00268915
Matched Strata Plans
SP107340,SP4655
Parties
Third Party v Government
Representation
Counsel: C Bevan / A Kaylinger (Appellant) K Lord (Respondent) Solicitors: Solon Lawyers (Appellant) Crown Solicitor (Respondent)
Orders
(1) The appeal is dismissed with costs.

Read full decision →

NCAT Orders Made High Adverse [2025] NSWCATCD 6 2025-01-31
A homeowner sued a builder alleging defects in the construction of their new home. The tribunal found the builder breached a warranty regarding the suitability of materials used for a polished concrete floor, specifically the sealant. The tribunal ordered the builder to pay the homeowner $55,999.19 for the cost of rectification work.
Building defects
$55,999 Compensation
BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION - Home building - Breach of statutory warranties
Before
Dr K M George, Senior Member
Hearing
12 November 2024
File Numbers
2023/00369499 (formerly HB 23/48520) 2024/00147859
Matched Strata Plans
SP92888
Parties
Lot Owner v Developer
Representation
Counsel: Kurmond Homes Pty Ltd: Mr Kent Solicitors: Kyle Douglas Fish: Enright Law Group Kurmond Homes Pty Ltd: Leeds Lawyers Polycrete Australia Pty Ltd: Mr Mekuri, Director
Orders
1 By 21 February 2025 Kurmond Homes Pty Ltd is to pay Kyle Fish $55,999.19. 2 Application 2023/00369499 is otherwise dismissed. 3 Application 2024/00147859 is dismissed. 4 If an application for costs is made: (a) The application is to be filed and served, supported by evidence and submissions not exceeding 3 pages in length by 17 February 2025; (b) Evidence and submissions in response to the costs application not exceeding 3 pages in length are to be filed and served by 3 March 2025; (c) Any...

Read full decision →

NCAT Orders Made High Adverse [2024] NSWCATCD 71 2024-12-30
An apartment owner sought compensation from the owners corporation for a water leak, as well as repairs. The tribunal found in favour of the applicant, ordering the owners to pay compensation and repair common property, specifically the brickwork. Costs were to be determined later.
Common propertyRepair & maintenanceParking & access
$98,374 Compensation
LAND LAW – strata title – duties of owners corporation – duty to maintain and repair common property – claims for rectification works and damages by lot owner under Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW), s 106(5) and 232(1) following breach of duty – reasonably foreseeable losses suffered as...
Before
D Robertson, Principal Member
Hearing
27 June 2024, last submissions received 23 August 2024
File Numbers
2024/00071125
Matched Strata Plans
SP2661
Parties
Lot Owner v Owners Corporation
Representation
Counsel: A Rizk (Applicant) C Purdy (Respondent) Solicitors: Sachs Gerace Lawyers (Applicant) Mills Oakley (Respondent)
Orders
(1) Pursuant to s 106(5) of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW) (the Act) order the respondent to pay the applicant $98,374.29 compensation for breach of s 106 of the Act within 28 days of the date of this decision. (2) Pursuant to s 232 of the Act, direct that the respondent is not to pay any compensation awarded to the applicant from levies to which the applicant has been required to contribute. (3) Pursuant to s 232 of the Act, direct the respondent, within two months of the date...

Read full decision →

Land & Environment Orders Made Medium Adverse [2024] NSWLEC 1730 2024-11-12
The applicants appealed against Development Control Orders related to fire safety. The tribunal, after a conciliation process, modified the original orders to extend compliance timeframes and remove some requirements, based on an agreement between the parties. The modifications were made to ensure adequate fire safety.
Fire safety
DEVELOPMENT CONTROL ORDER – fire safety order - conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – orders
Before
Targett C
Hearing
Conciliation Conference 24 July and 29 October 2024
File Numbers
2023/37295 2023/37305 2023/37299 2023/37297
Matched Strata Plans
SP87881
Parties
Developer v Government
Representation
Proceedings 2023/37295, 2023/37305, 2023/37299, 2023/37297 Counsel: C Novak (Applicant) T Poisel (Respondent) Solicitors: HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Applicant) NSW Department of Planning and...
Orders
Proceedings 2023/37295 The Court orders that: (1) The appeal is upheld. (2) Pursuant to s 8.18(4)(b) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the Development Control Order issued by the Minister for Planning to Fortius Broadway No 1 Pty Ltd (ACN 634 804 550), dated 10 January 2023, in respect of land identified as Lot 327 in Deposited Plan 1270348, is modified in accordance with the instrument set out in Annexure A. Proceedings 2023/37305 The Court orders that: (1) The appeal...

Read full decision →

NCAT Orders Made Medium [2024] NSWCATEN 4 2024-11-06
The Owners had filed an application for contempt against Selkirk, which they later withdrew. Selkirk applied for costs. The Tribunal decided that the Owners could not use funds from Selkirk's lot to pay the Owners' costs of the proceedings.
CONTEMPT - special circumstances warranting an order of costs – Civil and Administrative Act 2013 section 73 - contempt application withdrawn - unconditional withdrawal and dismissal of any application without a determination on the merits – both parties acted reasonably – Tribunal not satisfied...
Before
Coleman SC ADCJ, Principal Member
Hearing
On The Papers
File Numbers
2024/00179339
Matched Strata Plans
SP2661
Parties
Owners Corporation v Lot Owner
Representation
Counsel: C Purdy (Applicant) A Rizk (Respondent) Solicitors: Mills Oakley (Applicant) Sachs Gerace Lawyers (Respondent)
Orders
(1) That, pursuant to s 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) the Tribunal dispenses with a hearing of this application. (2) That, pursuant to s 60(4) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) the Owners Strata 2661 are restrained from applying any funds held to the credit of Simone Selkirk or payable by her to it towards or for the purposes of paying the Owners’ costs of or incidental to these proceedings.

Read full decision →

Supreme Court Dismissed Low [2024] NSWSC 769 2024-06-24
Mr. Vatner sought to set aside land tax assessments for his property. The tribunal determined that the land was not exempt from land tax. Consequently, the assessments were affirmed, and Mr. Vatner was ordered to pay the Commissioner's costs.
TAXES AND DUTIES — land tax — liability — concessions — principal place of residence
Before
Richmond J
Hearing
29 April–1 May 2024
File Numbers
2022/190833
Matched Strata Plans
SP107340,SP4655
Parties
Lot Owner v Government
Representation
Counsel: C Bevan (Plaintiff) K Lord (Defendant) Solicitors: Crown Solicitor’s Office (Defendant)
Orders
Appeal dismissed. Plaintiff to pay the defendant’s costs on the ordinary basis.

Read full decision →

Supreme Court Orders Made Medium [2024] NSWSC 760 2024-06-21
An owners corporation appealed a decision related to a lot owner's claim for damages following a leak, arguing the lot owner's conduct affected their claim. The court allowed the appeal in part, finding it was open to the owners corporation to argue the lot owner's actions affected the claim. The court also referred concerns about the lot owner to the professional regulator.
Common propertyRepair & maintenance
LAND LAW – strata title – duties of owners corporation – duty to maintain and repair common property – claims for rectification works and damages by lot owner under Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW), s 106(5) and 232(1) following breach of duty – whether entitlement of owners corporation...
Before
Leeming JA
Hearing
12 June 2024
File Numbers
2024/85147
Matched Strata Plans
SP2661
Parties
Owners Corporation v Lot Owner
Representation
Counsel: C Purdy (Plaintiff) A Rizk (Defendant) Solicitors: Mills Oakley (Plaintiff) Sachs Gerace Lawyers (Defendant)
Orders
1. Grant leave to appeal, confined to ground 3 of the summons filed on 5 March 2024, and otherwise refuse leave. 2. Appeal allowed. 3. Answer the question “Whether a mitigation defence is available in answer or partial answer to a claim for damages under s 106(5)”: It is open to an owners corporation to seek to establish that all or part of a lot owner’s claimed damages are not damages for foreseeable losses as a result of the owners corporation’s breach of duty, including by establishing...

Read full decision →

NCAT Orders Made Medium Adverse [2024] NSWCATAP 44 2024-03-27
An applicant appealed a decision, claiming the owners corporation breached its duty to repair common property. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding in favor of the applicant, and ordered the owners corporation to pay the applicant's appeal costs. The Tribunal reserved the costs of the initial hearing for later determination.
Repair & maintenance
REAL PROPERTY – STRATA MANAGEMENT – strict duty of repair – onus of proof on scope and consequences of breach – causation and mitigation – measure and quantification of loss – Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW) ss 106, 122, 124, 232. COSTS – costs orders on severable issues - application...
Before
S Westgarth, Deputy President G Burton SC, Senior Member
Hearing
On the papers
File Numbers
2023/00289207
Matched Strata Plans
SP2661
Parties
Lot Owner v Owners Corporation
Representation
Counsel: A Rizk, (Appellant) C Purdy, (Respondent) Solicitors: Sachs Gerace Lawyers (Appellant) Mills Oakley Lawyers (Respondent)
Orders
(1) Order that a hearing on costs is dispensed with. (2) Order that the first respondent (OC) pay the appellant’s costs of the appeal on the ordinary basis as agreed or assessed except for the costs of the flooring issue not pressed on appeal. (3) Note that, the appellant having been found to have been successful in the proceedings within the meaning of s 104 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW), pursuant to the operation of s 104 of that Act costs and expenses of the OC in the...

Read full decision →

NCAT Orders Made Medium Adverse [2024] NSWCATAP 17 2024-02-06
An apartment owner appealed a previous decision regarding common property repairs in their bathroom. The tribunal found errors in the original decision concerning the owners corporation's obligations. The appeal was allowed, and the case was sent back to the tribunal for a new decision.
Repair & maintenance
REAL PROPERTY – STRATA MANAGEMENT – strict duty of repair – onus of proof on scope and consequences of breach – causation and mitigation – measure and quantification of loss – Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW) ss 106, 122, 124, 232
Before
S Westgarth, Deputy President G Burton SC, Senior Member
Hearing
14 November 2023
File Numbers
2023/00289207
Matched Strata Plans
SP2661
Parties
Lot Owner v Owners Corporation
Representation
Sachs Gerace Lawyers (Appellant) Mills Oakley Lawyers (Respondent)
Orders
1. As against the first respondent Owners SP 2661, (a) to the extent necessary leave to appeal is granted, and (b) the appeal is allowed. 2. Note that the second respondent was by consent order dated 26 October 2023 removed as a party to the appeal. 3. The proceedings are remitted for determination by the Tribunal consistent with the findings and reasons in this decision on the following matters and any related matters pressed on this appeal: the scope of work and terms of the work order to...

Read full decision →

NCAT Orders Made Medium Adverse [2022] NSWCATCD 157 2022-09-07
A lot owner applied for compensation from the owners corporation for water damage. The tribunal found the owners corporation breached its duty to maintain common property and ordered payment of damages for the water damage. The tribunal dismissed parts of the claim due to time limits.
Common propertyRepair & maintenance
$3,604 Compensation
LAND LAW – Strata title – common property – maintenance of common property – breach – damages – whether damages claim is out of time – whether compliance with duty to maintain the common property in good and serviceable repair has been deferred
Before
P French, Senior Member
Hearing
19 April 2022
File Numbers
SC 21/45413
Matched Strata Plans
SP88789
Parties
Lot Owner v Owners Corporation
Representation
Applicant (self-represented) Counsel: A Power (Respondent) Solicitor: J S Mueller & Co (Respondent)
Orders
(1) The Owners – Strata Plan No. 88789 must pay Yu Wang $3,604.00 immediately. (2) The application is otherwise dismissed.

Read full decision →

Supreme Court Orders Made Medium Adverse [2022] NSWSC 858 2022-06-29
A lot owner sued the owners corporation and another lot owner over water damage, strata levies, and noise. The court decided to transfer the case to NCAT. The court made no order regarding costs for either party.
COSTS – dispute concerning a strata scheme – parties agree that proceedings should be transferred to NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal – whether order for costs should be made against plaintiff – plaintiff not shown to have acted unreasonably – appropriate to make no order as to costs
Before
Darke J
Hearing
On the papers
File Numbers
2021/196829
Matched Strata Plans
SP2661
Parties
Lot Owner v Owners Corporation
Representation
Counsel: Mr H Black (First Defendant) Solicitors: Sachs Gerace Lawyers (Plaintiff) Vardanega Roberts (First Defendant)
Orders
Proceedings transferred to New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal. No order as to costs.

Read full decision →

Supreme Court Dismissed Low [2021] NSWSC 1315 2021-10-18
The developer appealed a decision that found their Biowood cladding did not comply with the Building Code of Australia. The court dismissed the appeal, finding the cladding presented an undue fire risk and that the lower tribunal's decision was correct. The developer was ordered to pay the Owners Corporation's costs.
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – appeal pursuant to s 83 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) – decision of Appeal Panel of Civil and Administrative Tribunal that use of “Biowood” attachments to external walls of multi-storey residential buildings constitutes undue risk of fire spread –...
Before
Henry J
Hearing
16 October 2020
File Numbers
2020/253142
Matched Strata Plans
SP92888
Parties
Developer v Owners Corporation
Representation
Counsel: G A Sirtes SC with B Le Plastrier (Plaintiffs) T Davie with A Power (Defendant) Solicitors: Colin Biggers & Paisley Lawyers (Plaintiffs) JS Mueller & Co Lawyers (Defendant)
Orders
(1) Grant leave to appeal. (2) Dismiss the amended summons filed by the First Plaintiff and the cross-summons filed by the Second Plaintiff. (3) Unless any party makes an application for a different costs order within 14 days, the Defendant’s costs of these proceedings be paid by the First and Second Plaintiffs on an ordinary basis as agreed or assessed.

Read full decision →

Data sourced from the NSW StrataHub public register. Dynamic Property Services Pty Ltd is 1 of 459 strata managers tracked by Compare Strata. Browse all managers or find managers by suburb.