Portfolio Profile
Lot Types
Residential 1,932 (86%)
Commercial 221 (10%)
Utility 9 (0%)
Other 91 (4%)
Scheme Size Distribution
Distribution of schemes by total lot count. Average scheme size: 18.5 lots. The portfolio is dominated by small schemes (10 lots or fewer), typical of townhouse and villa complexes.
Portfolio Age
Schemes by registration decade. Oldest scheme registered 1964, newest 2025.
Suburb Coverage
| Suburb | Schemes | Lots | % of Portfolio | Market Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mudgee 2850 | 50 | 359 | 41% | 51.5% | |
| Blacktown 2148 | 9 | 233 | 7% | 2.7% | |
| Kellyville Ridge 2155 | 5 | 172 | 4% | 29.4% | |
| Rooty Hill 2766 | 3 | 38 | 2% | 3.9% | |
| Prospect 2148 | 2 | 199 | 2% | 6.2% | |
| Lidcombe 2141 | 2 | 90 | 2% | 0.7% | |
| Smeaton Grange 2567 | 2 | 40 | 2% | 2.6% | |
| Condell Park 2200 | 2 | 37 | 2% | 1.1% | |
| Guildford 2161 | 2 | 47 | 2% | 1.1% | |
| Prestons 2170 | 2 | 34 | 2% | 1.2% |
| Bankstown 2200 | 2 | 29 | 2% | 0.5% | |
| Toongabbie 2146 | 2 | 28 | 2% | 1.4% | |
| Quakers Hill 2763 | 2 | 14 | 2% | 0.7% | |
| The Ponds 2769 | 2 | 4 | 2% | 6.2% | |
| Plumpton 2761 | 1 | 97 | 1% | 3.3% | |
| Woodcroft 2767 | 1 | 96 | 1% | 4.8% | |
| Wentworth Point 2127 | 1 | 76 | 1% | 1.7% | |
| Sutherland 2232 | 1 | 67 | 1% | 0.4% | |
| Chippendale 2008 | 1 | 59 | 1% | 1.3% | |
| Waitara 2077 | 1 | 51 | 1% | 1.4% | |
| Penrith 2750 | 1 | 43 | 1% | 0.2% | |
| South Granville 2142 | 1 | 40 | 1% | 4.0% | |
| Hurstville 2220 | 1 | 31 | 1% | 0.2% | |
| Ropes Crossing 2760 | 1 | 29 | 1% | 8.3% | |
| Rockdale 2216 | 1 | 27 | 1% | 0.5% | |
| Doonside 2767 | 1 | 26 | 1% | 2.4% | |
| Greenwich 2065 | 1 | 23 | 1% | 1.3% | |
| Edmondson Park 2174 | 1 | 23 | 1% | 3.2% | |
| Ryde 2112 | 1 | 19 | 1% | 0.2% | |
| Girraween 2145 | 1 | 19 | 1% | 0.7% | |
| Morisset 2264 | 1 | 18 | 1% | 1.4% | |
| St Marys 2760 | 1 | 18 | 1% | 0.3% | |
| Pendle Hill 2145 | 1 | 15 | 1% | 1.3% | |
| Rosebery 2018 | 1 | 14 | 1% | 1.1% | |
| Moorebank 2170 | 1 | 14 | 1% | 0.9% | |
| Seven Hills 2147 | 1 | 13 | 1% | 0.7% | |
| Allawah 2218 | 1 | 12 | 1% | 0.6% | |
| Campsie 2194 | 1 | 12 | 1% | 0.2% | |
| Granville 2142 | 1 | 12 | 1% | 0.5% | |
| Strathfield 2135 | 1 | 11 | 1% | 0.4% | |
| Maroubra 2035 | 1 | 9 | 1% | 0.2% | |
| Carlingford 2118 | 1 | 9 | 1% | 0.6% | |
| Roselands 2196 | 1 | 8 | 1% | 1.1% | |
| Lawson 2783 | 1 | 8 | 1% | 8.3% | |
| Wentworthville 2145 | 1 | 8 | 1% | 0.3% | |
| Wollongong 2500 | 1 | 7 | 1% | 0.1% | |
| Harris Park 2150 | 1 | 6 | 1% | 0.7% | |
| Lakemba 2195 | 1 | 5 | 1% | 0.3% | |
| Parramatta 2150 | 1 | 4 | 1% | 0.2% |
Tribunal & Court History
1
Total Cases
1
NCAT
1 case on record.
An owner of an apartment sought to have parking fees removed from their ledger, as the owner thought the fees were an invalid penalty. The Tribunal agreed with the applicant, declaring the by-law imposing the fees invalid as it went beyond the Owners Corporation's powers, and ordered that the fees and any associated interest be removed from the applicant's ledger.
LAND LAW – strata title – by-laws – whether by-laws were changed in accordance with s141 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 – whether the owners corporation had power to make a by-law imposing penalties for parking in breach of the by-laws – whether the by-law should be declared invalid...
Before
M Deane, Senior Member
Hearing
29 March 2021
File Numbers
SC 20/41370
Matched Strata Plans
SP91204
Parties
Lot Owner v Owners Corporation
Representation
Applicant: self-represented Respondent: Tony Kairouz – Strata Manager
Orders
(1) Under s 150 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 the Tribunal declares that by-law 26.4 of SP 91204 is invalid from the date of registration. (2) In accordance with the provisions of s 246 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 the Owners Corporation shall cause a certified copy of this order to be lodged with the office of the Registrar General accompanied by the Certificate of Title comprising the common property in the strata plan and any fee payable for the recording of such...
Google Reviews
29 Jul 2025
“They are a great company that has assisted us in resolving lingering issues left by the previous agent. They have provided valuable insight on managing parking and other breaches. Most importantly, for me and the committee and owners who are active , they always take the time to assist, listen...”
05 Jun 2025
“We have just moved over from another strata company to Successful Strata and wanted to share how impressed we are with the level of service.
Jarrad is very professional, helpful and quick to respond to emails and phone calls.
We are extremely happy with the service.”
26 Oct 2024
“We have found this strata management to be ineffective and unresponsive. The lift in our building has been out of service multiple times within the past year, and they haven’t managed to provide a permanent fix. Routine cleaning is neglected, and the garbage room is poorly managed. When...”
01 Jun 2023
“The team at Succesful Strata are amazing. David and Tony are fantastic contacts with a wealth of industry and professional knowledge. Paired with this is a fantastic attitude towards their roles and the people they work with. Our building has been noticeably improved, as mentioned by a few...”
29 Mar 2022
“We have been dealing with Tony And Belinda for a few years now and we have found them to always being courteous and respectful to us and our needs. Tony has always responded very quickly when we have had an issue and arranged repairs in a very timely matter. We highly recommend Successful Strata...”