Portfolio Profile
Lot Types
Residential 6,206 (61%)
Commercial 3,934 (39%)
Utility 31 (0%)
Other 21 (0%)
Scheme Size Distribution
Distribution of schemes by total lot count. Average scheme size: 15.7 lots. The portfolio is dominated by small schemes (10 lots or fewer), typical of townhouse and villa complexes.
Portfolio Age
Schemes by registration decade. Oldest scheme registered 1963, newest 2023.
Suburb Coverage
| Suburb | Schemes | Lots | % of Portfolio | Market Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nelson Bay 2315 | 76 | 1,209 | 12% | 21.5% | |
| Dee Why 2099 | 23 | 454 | 4% | 3.7% | |
| East Gosford 2250 | 22 | 107 | 3% | 9.6% | |
| Mona Vale 2103 | 21 | 494 | 3% | 9.7% | |
| Salamander Bay 2317 | 20 | 103 | 3% | 13.1% | |
| Avoca Beach 2251 | 20 | 123 | 3% | 16.5% | |
| Terrigal 2260 | 18 | 114 | 3% | 4.0% | |
| Brookvale 2100 | 17 | 1,203 | 3% | 11.6% | |
| Warriewood 2102 | 15 | 479 | 2% | 19.7% | |
| Manly 2095 | 13 | 155 | 2% | 1.8% |
| Soldiers Point 2317 | 13 | 92 | 2% | 18.6% | |
| Narrabeen 2101 | 12 | 144 | 2% | 5.8% | |
| Newport 2106 | 12 | 123 | 2% | 7.5% | |
| Byron Bay 2481 | 11 | 168 | 2% | 2.1% | |
| Shoal Bay 2315 | 11 | 108 | 2% | 9.6% | |
| Kincumber 2251 | 11 | 186 | 2% | 13.1% | |
| Lemon Tree Passage 2319 | 10 | 166 | 2% | 38.5% | |
| Hawks Nest 2324 | 10 | 70 | 2% | 8.3% | |
| Corlette 2315 | 10 | 50 | 2% | 9.6% | |
| Taylors Beach 2316 | 10 | 88 | 2% | 27.8% | |
| Balgowlah 2093 | 9 | 82 | 1% | 2.3% | |
| Collaroy 2097 | 9 | 231 | 1% | 5.6% | |
| Gosford 2250 | 7 | 296 | 1% | 4.1% | |
| Fingal Bay 2315 | 7 | 38 | 1% | 7.7% | |
| Anna Bay 2316 | 7 | 28 | 1% | 15.6% | |
| Fairlight 2094 | 7 | 32 | 1% | 2.5% | |
| Cromer 2099 | 6 | 211 | 1% | 12.2% | |
| Mosman 2088 | 5 | 125 | 1% | 0.5% | |
| Avalon Beach 2107 | 5 | 42 | 1% | 5.1% | |
| Tanilba Bay 2319 | 5 | 80 | 1% | 35.7% | |
| West Gosford 2250 | 5 | 37 | 1% | 5.0% | |
| North Gosford 2250 | 5 | 57 | 1% | 6.6% | |
| Woy Woy 2256 | 5 | 38 | 1% | 1.4% | |
| Tea Gardens 2324 | 5 | 26 | 1% | 10.4% | |
| Wamberal 2260 | 5 | 32 | 1% | 7.1% | |
| Copacabana 2251 | 5 | 18 | 1% | 22.7% | |
| Parramatta 2150 | 4 | 168 | 1% | 0.8% | |
| Bankstown 2200 | 4 | 203 | 1% | 0.9% | |
| Gladesville 2111 | 4 | 67 | 1% | 1.5% | |
| Telopea 2117 | 4 | 59 | 1% | 4.5% | |
| Hornsby 2077 | 4 | 29 | 1% | 1.1% | |
| Chullora 2190 | 3 | 145 | 0% | 100.0% | |
| North Sydney 2060 | 3 | 174 | 0% | 1.2% | |
| Lane Cove West 2066 | 3 | 84 | 0% | 11.1% | |
| Frenchs Forest 2086 | 3 | 59 | 0% | 5.3% | |
| Carlingford 2118 | 3 | 78 | 0% | 1.9% | |
| Guildford 2161 | 3 | 40 | 0% | 1.6% | |
| Killcare 2257 | 3 | 57 | 0% | 75.0% | |
| Ryde 2112 | 3 | 30 | 0% | 0.7% | |
| North Ryde 2113 | 3 | 33 | 0% | 2.3% | |
| Charlestown 2290 | 3 | 22 | 0% | 1.0% | |
| The Entrance 2261 | 3 | 34 | 0% | 1.4% | |
| Freshwater 2096 | 3 | 27 | 0% | 1.4% | |
| Artarmon 2064 | 3 | 19 | 0% | 1.7% | |
| Baulkham Hills 2153 | 3 | 26 | 0% | 1.4% | |
| Berkeley Vale 2261 | 3 | 15 | 0% | 3.2% | |
| Darlinghurst 2010 | 3 | 9 | 0% | 0.8% | |
| Thornleigh 2120 | 2 | 85 | 0% | 2.4% | |
| Suffolk Park 2481 | 2 | 104 | 0% | 1.5% | |
| Revesby 2212 | 2 | 92 | 0% | 1.1% | |
| Cardiff 2285 | 2 | 52 | 0% | 2.0% | |
| Sutherland 2232 | 2 | 66 | 0% | 0.8% | |
| Merrylands 2160 | 2 | 47 | 0% | 0.5% | |
| Lane Cove North 2066 | 2 | 32 | 0% | 1.0% | |
| Saratoga 2251 | 2 | 34 | 0% | 8.3% | |
| Bronte 2024 | 2 | 22 | 0% | 1.1% | |
| Granville 2142 | 2 | 19 | 0% | 1.0% | |
| Lidcombe 2141 | 2 | 21 | 0% | 0.7% | |
| Rutherford 2320 | 2 | 16 | 0% | 1.6% | |
| Seaforth 2092 | 2 | 13 | 0% | 2.9% | |
| Wiley Park 2195 | 2 | 13 | 0% | 1.0% | |
| West Ryde 2114 | 2 | 9 | 0% | 0.7% | |
| Forresters Beach 2260 | 2 | 8 | 0% | 14.3% | |
| Dubbo 2830 | 2 | 8 | 0% | 1.0% | |
| Mayfield 2304 | 2 | 8 | 0% | 1.0% | |
| Bellevue Hill 2023 | 2 | 8 | 0% | 0.5% | |
| Raymond Terrace 2324 | 2 | 5 | 0% | 1.2% | |
| Rosebery 2018 | 1 | 81 | 0% | 1.1% | |
| Greenwich 2065 | 1 | 63 | 0% | 1.3% | |
| Banksmeadow 2019 | 1 | 56 | 0% | 2.9% | |
| Wheeler Heights 2097 | 1 | 49 | 0% | 10.0% | |
| Ermington 2115 | 1 | 48 | 0% | 2.0% | |
| Gordon 2072 | 1 | 47 | 0% | 1.3% | |
| Chiswick 2046 | 1 | 45 | 0% | 2.4% | |
| Forestville 2087 | 1 | 44 | 0% | 3.7% | |
| North Manly 2100 | 1 | 29 | 0% | 4.3% | |
| Liverpool 2170 | 1 | 27 | 0% | 0.2% | |
| Potts Point 2011 | 1 | 25 | 0% | 0.5% | |
| Alexandria 2015 | 1 | 25 | 0% | 0.5% | |
| Harris Park 2150 | 1 | 24 | 0% | 0.7% | |
| Bondi Beach 2026 | 1 | 24 | 0% | 0.2% | |
| Elanora Heights 2101 | 1 | 21 | 0% | 8.3% | |
| Waratah 2298 | 1 | 18 | 0% | 1.4% | |
| Toronto 2283 | 1 | 17 | 0% | 1.1% | |
| Camperdown 2050 | 1 | 16 | 0% | 1.0% | |
| Milperra 2214 | 1 | 16 | 0% | 3.7% | |
| Cherrybrook 2126 | 1 | 16 | 0% | 0.8% | |
| St Marys 2760 | 1 | 15 | 0% | 0.3% | |
| St Ives 2075 | 1 | 15 | 0% | 0.8% | |
| Mount Druitt 2770 | 1 | 15 | 0% | 0.5% | |
| Mayfield East 2304 | 1 | 14 | 0% | 4.3% | |
| Drummoyne 2047 | 1 | 12 | 0% | 0.4% | |
| Toongabbie 2146 | 1 | 12 | 0% | 0.7% | |
| Homebush 2140 | 1 | 12 | 0% | 0.9% | |
| Asquith 2077 | 1 | 10 | 0% | 1.3% | |
| Kariong 2250 | 1 | 10 | 0% | 1.9% | |
| Pendle Hill 2145 | 1 | 10 | 0% | 1.3% | |
| Davistown 2251 | 1 | 9 | 0% | 5.6% | |
| Condell Park 2200 | 1 | 9 | 0% | 0.6% | |
| Pymble 2073 | 1 | 9 | 0% | 1.3% | |
| Dundas 2117 | 1 | 9 | 0% | 1.7% | |
| Gorokan 2263 | 1 | 8 | 0% | 1.1% | |
| Macquarie Park 2113 | 1 | 8 | 0% | 0.7% | |
| Mcmahons Point 2060 | 1 | 8 | 0% | 1.2% | |
| Canley Vale 2166 | 1 | 8 | 0% | 1.4% | |
| Wyoming 2250 | 1 | 8 | 0% | 1.9% | |
| Constitution Hill 2145 | 1 | 8 | 0% | 3.8% | |
| Koolewong 2256 | 1 | 8 | 0% | 33.3% | |
| Boolaroo 2284 | 1 | 8 | 0% | 2.7% | |
| Naremburn 2065 | 1 | 8 | 0% | 1.0% | |
| Willoughby 2068 | 1 | 8 | 0% | 1.5% | |
| Green Point 2251 | 1 | 8 | 0% | 0.6% | |
| Silverwater 2128 | 1 | 8 | 0% | 1.6% | |
| Curl Curl 2096 | 1 | 7 | 0% | 4.0% | |
| Turramurra 2074 | 1 | 7 | 0% | 1.3% | |
| Greystanes 2145 | 1 | 7 | 0% | 2.6% | |
| Ettalong Beach 2257 | 1 | 7 | 0% | 0.3% | |
| Beverly Hills 2209 | 1 | 7 | 0% | 1.1% | |
| Sylvania 2224 | 1 | 7 | 0% | 0.5% | |
| Eastwood 2122 | 1 | 6 | 0% | 0.2% | |
| Croydon Park 2133 | 1 | 6 | 0% | 0.8% | |
| Beacon Hill 2100 | 1 | 6 | 0% | 5.0% | |
| Green Valley 2168 | 1 | 6 | 0% | 2.3% | |
| Jesmond 2299 | 1 | 6 | 0% | 1.4% | |
| Kingscliff 2487 | 1 | 6 | 0% | 0.3% | |
| Cheltenham 2119 | 1 | 6 | 0% | 16.7% | |
| Ballina 2478 | 1 | 6 | 0% | 0.2% | |
| Kirribilli 2061 | 1 | 5 | 0% | 0.5% | |
| Girraween 2145 | 1 | 5 | 0% | 0.7% | |
| Greenacre 2190 | 1 | 5 | 0% | 0.6% | |
| Allambie Heights 2100 | 1 | 5 | 0% | 5.0% | |
| Kingswood 2747 | 1 | 5 | 0% | 0.4% | |
| The Hill 2300 | 1 | 5 | 0% | 0.9% | |
| Warners Bay 2282 | 1 | 5 | 0% | 0.4% | |
| Camden 2570 | 1 | 4 | 0% | 2.2% | |
| Manly Vale 2093 | 1 | 4 | 0% | 1.0% | |
| Kellyville 2155 | 1 | 4 | 0% | 3.3% | |
| Quakers Hill 2763 | 1 | 4 | 0% | 0.4% | |
| Cremorne 2090 | 1 | 4 | 0% | 0.2% | |
| East Maitland 2323 | 1 | 4 | 0% | 0.5% | |
| Mallabula 2319 | 1 | 4 | 0% | 20.0% | |
| Point Frederick 2250 | 1 | 4 | 0% | 1.4% | |
| Vaucluse 2030 | 1 | 3 | 0% | 0.4% | |
| North Narrabeen 2101 | 1 | 3 | 0% | 4.2% | |
| Lavender Bay 2060 | 1 | 3 | 0% | 2.6% | |
| Denistone East 2112 | 1 | 3 | 0% | 2.1% | |
| Whitebridge 2290 | 1 | 3 | 0% | 2.7% | |
| Lakemba 2195 | 1 | 3 | 0% | 0.3% | |
| Wahroonga 2076 | 1 | 3 | 0% | 0.9% | |
| Erina 2250 | 1 | 3 | 0% | 0.6% | |
| Cardiff South 2285 | 1 | 3 | 0% | 4.0% | |
| Shortland 2307 | 1 | 2 | 0% | 2.4% | |
| Batemans Bay 2536 | 1 | 2 | 0% | 0.5% | |
| Bonnyrigg Heights 2177 | 1 | 2 | 0% | 14.3% | |
| Tenambit 2323 | 1 | 2 | 0% | 3.0% | |
| Castlecrag 2068 | 1 | 2 | 0% | 25.0% |
Tribunal & Court History
2
Total Cases
2
NCAT
2 cases on record.
An apartment owner sought to have the owners corporation repair water damage and other defects. The tribunal initially dismissed the application due to a time limit, but the appeal panel found the time limit was incorrectly applied and the case should be reheard.
Appeal – claim for work orders and compensation under the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW) – whether the two-year time limit under s 106(6) applies to all or only part of the application – error of law
Before
S Westgarth, Deputy President P H Molony, Senior Member
Hearing
5 June 2023
File Numbers
2025/00052938
Matched Strata Plans
SP85271
Parties
Lot Owner v Owners Corporation
Representation
Appellant (self-represented) Counsel: J Pokoney (Respondent) Solicitor: Gilchrist Connell (Respondent)
Orders
(1) The appeal is upheld. (2) The Appellant’s application lodged 6 September 2024 is remitted to the Consumer and Commercial Division to be heard according to law.
An applicant lot owner, purporting to act on behalf of the strata committee, filed multiple applications against the strata managing agent. The applicant withdrew some applications and the agent was removed from others. The tribunal decided that, in the absence of special circumstances, each party should pay their own costs, despite the agent's argument and substantial legal expenses.
COSTS - Application of established principles - whether circumstances warranted an order for costs - disproportionate costs
Before
Graham Ellis SC, Senior Member
Hearing
22 March 2024 (on the papers)
File Numbers
2023/00386799 (formerly SC 23/30624), 2023/00386792 (formerly SC 23/30630), 2023/00384391 (formerly SC 23/33133), and 2023/00371189 (formerly SC 23/46639):
Matched Strata Plans
SP85779
Parties
Lot Owner v Managing Agent
Representation
Solicitors: Applicant – Makinson d’Apice Former Respondent – Bannermans
Orders
In each of the four applications 2023/00386799 (formerly SC 23/30624), 2023/00386792 (formerly SC 23/30630), 2023/00384391 (formerly SC 23/33133), and 2023/00371189 (formerly SC 23/46639): 1 The Tribunal dispenses with a hearing on the question of costs. 2 Each party is to bear their own costs.
Google Reviews
04 Jan 2026
“We have seen a noticeable improvement in maintenance, transparency, and overall organisation since Precise Property took over managing our strata building. They’re responsive, easy to deal with, and always willing to help. They handle everything with professionalism and care. It’s reassuring to...”
27 Nov 2025
“Natalie Smith works with the team at Precise Property Strata managers and a credit to them. Since we acquired an apartment in her strata we have been impressed by her happy nature and willingness to help with any task. She actually does what she says she will do, a refreshing change from "your...”
01 Dec 2025
“Natalie Smith has looked after our complex for the last 18 months. We have 71 properties and a lot of grounds, so we keep her pretty busy. Natalie is always helpful and professional in her dealings with us, and responds promptly and efficiently to our many requests. I enjoy working with...”
08 Dec 2025
“We had an average experience with precise managing our strata over recent years. Our particular strata manager provided poor customer service, was slow at following up basic trades requests for the property & became very negative & defensive when we provided feedback on the level of service we...”
12 Mar 2025
“Sally Reeves has been our strata manager for a couple of years now, following from some disastrous experiences with other SM companies.
Dealing with Precise Property has been a breath of fresh air.
Communication has been a dream. They answer emails properly in good time, pass on queries from...”