Portfolio Profile
Lot Types
Residential 1,266 (97%)
Commercial 40 (3%)
Scheme Size Distribution
Distribution of schemes by total lot count. Average scheme size: 16.3 lots. The portfolio is dominated by small schemes (10 lots or fewer), typical of townhouse and villa complexes.
Portfolio Age
Schemes by registration decade. Oldest scheme registered 1965, newest 2022.
Suburb Coverage
| Suburb | Schemes | Lots | % of Portfolio | Market Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| West Ryde 2114 | 7 | 33 | 9% | 2.4% | |
| Northmead 2152 | 6 | 281 | 8% | 5.9% | |
| Ryde 2112 | 6 | 57 | 8% | 1.5% | |
| Denistone 2114 | 4 | 22 | 5% | 6.8% | |
| Liverpool 2170 | 2 | 122 | 2% | 0.5% | |
| Mount Druitt 2770 | 2 | 139 | 2% | 1.0% | |
| Warwick Farm 2170 | 2 | 102 | 2% | 2.6% | |
| Westmead 2145 | 2 | 32 | 2% | 0.7% | |
| Mortlake 2137 | 2 | 24 | 2% | 4.9% | |
| Telopea 2117 | 2 | 24 | 2% | 2.2% |
| Eastwood 2122 | 2 | 13 | 2% | 0.5% | |
| Strathfield 2135 | 2 | 14 | 2% | 0.9% | |
| Lakemba 2195 | 2 | 12 | 2% | 0.5% | |
| Maroubra 2035 | 2 | 10 | 2% | 0.3% | |
| Rockdale 2216 | 1 | 36 | 1% | 0.5% | |
| Dundas Valley 2117 | 1 | 19 | 1% | 3.2% | |
| Parramatta 2150 | 1 | 19 | 1% | 0.2% | |
| Merrylands 2160 | 1 | 19 | 1% | 0.2% | |
| Granville 2142 | 1 | 18 | 1% | 0.5% | |
| Rydalmere 2116 | 1 | 18 | 1% | 1.8% | |
| Ermington 2115 | 1 | 18 | 1% | 2.0% | |
| Fairfield 2165 | 1 | 16 | 1% | 0.4% | |
| Meadowbank 2114 | 1 | 15 | 1% | 1.2% | |
| Bankstown 2200 | 1 | 15 | 1% | 0.2% | |
| Narrabeen 2101 | 1 | 14 | 1% | 0.5% | |
| Bondi Junction 2022 | 1 | 13 | 1% | 0.5% | |
| Randwick 2031 | 1 | 12 | 1% | 0.1% | |
| Lane Cove North 2066 | 1 | 12 | 1% | 0.5% | |
| Silverwater 2128 | 1 | 12 | 1% | 1.6% | |
| Harris Park 2150 | 1 | 12 | 1% | 0.7% | |
| Melrose Park 2114 | 1 | 11 | 1% | 7.1% | |
| St Marys 2760 | 1 | 11 | 1% | 0.3% | |
| Hornsby 2077 | 1 | 10 | 1% | 0.3% | |
| Bellevue Hill 2023 | 1 | 9 | 1% | 0.2% | |
| Dundas 2117 | 1 | 9 | 1% | 1.7% | |
| North Parramatta 2151 | 1 | 9 | 1% | 0.3% | |
| Belmore 2192 | 1 | 8 | 1% | 0.5% | |
| Lidcombe 2141 | 1 | 8 | 1% | 0.3% | |
| Centennial Park 2021 | 1 | 8 | 1% | 1.9% | |
| South Granville 2142 | 1 | 8 | 1% | 4.0% | |
| Campsie 2194 | 1 | 8 | 1% | 0.2% | |
| South Wentworthville 2145 | 1 | 8 | 1% | 1.4% | |
| Toongabbie 2146 | 1 | 7 | 1% | 0.7% | |
| Lane Cove 2066 | 1 | 7 | 1% | 0.5% | |
| Gladesville 2111 | 1 | 6 | 1% | 0.4% | |
| Allambie Heights 2100 | 1 | 5 | 1% | 5.0% | |
| Guildford 2161 | 1 | 5 | 1% | 0.5% | |
| North Strathfield 2137 | 1 | 5 | 1% | 1.2% | |
| Carlingford 2118 | 1 | 4 | 1% | 0.6% | |
| Coogee 2034 | 1 | 4 | 1% | 0.1% | |
| Tennyson Point 2111 | 1 | 3 | 1% | 7.7% |
Tribunal & Court History
2
Total Cases
2
NCAT
2 cases on record. None resulted in adverse findings.
The applicants sought the appointment of a compulsory strata manager and the removal of certain strata committee members. The tribunal denied both requests, finding that the alleged issues did not meet the threshold for such orders. The applicants' case was dismissed.
Compulsory manager sought but refused: The tribunal found that the issues raised by the applicants did not justify the appointment of a strata manager.
STRATA TITLE – Appointment of strata managing agent - Removal of Strata Committee members
Before
D. Goldstein. Senior Member
Hearing
25 August 2023
File Numbers
2023/00401749 (Previously SC 23/16911)
Matched Strata Plans
SP5362
Parties
Lot Owner v Owners Corporation
Representation
Solicitors: Mr I McKnight for the respondents
Orders
1 The application is dismissed. 2 In the event that a party wishes to bring a costs application, such application must be lodged in the Tribunal and served on/given to the costs respondent within 14 days of the date of the orders in these proceedings either attaching or referring to the documents relied upon in support of the application. 3 The costs respondent will have 14 days after the date it or they receives the application to lodge in the Tribunal and serve on/give to the costs...
The applicant sought a work order renewal because of a failure to comply with a previous consent work order. The tribunal decided that the parties should bear their own costs, finding no special circumstances. This was due to both parties' conduct and the lack of proportionality in the costs incurred relative to the amount in dispute.
COSTS – Whether special circumstances warranting an order for costs – Proportionality of costs to amount in issue considered
Before
Graham Ellis SC, Senior Member
Hearing
28 March 2022 (on the papers)
File Numbers
HB 21/21912
Matched Strata Plans
SP85292
Parties
Owners Corporation v Developer
Representation
Solicitors: Bannermans Lawyers (Applicant) A+ Legal (Respondent)
Orders
1 The Tribunal dispenses with a hearing on the question of costs, pursuant to s 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013. 2 Each party is to pay their own costs.
Google Reviews
04 Feb 2026
“Best agents I’ve had - they managed the apartment I was renting, quick to respond, showed genuine care and concern for any issues I raised. Very timely with inspections fair to the landlord and to me by raising few concerns, and promptly followed up. Will miss having Nayiri and Christine as my agents.”
09 Oct 2025
“We had such a great experience with Platinum Properties! The team were always amazing to deal with — super quick to respond, honest, and genuinely caring throughout our tenancy.
They made everything easy for us and even went above and beyond by providing a reference for our next property, which...”
09 Dec 2025
“My first experience of renting was with Christine Elmassian – Property Manager
at Platinum Properties (NSW). It was seamless.
All the staff were friendly, efficient and very clear in communications via phone, email and face to face.
They responded to issues and ensured ample notice of...”
11 Jun 2025
“Platinum Properties' team deserves high praise for their exceptional management of our investment property over the past 15 years. Their professionalism ensured the property remained well-maintained and tenant-friendly. We particularly appreciate their prompt inspection reports, proactive...”
21 Jul 2024
“I am thrilled to share my positive experience with Platinum Properties NSW! The team of sisters running this business is nothing short of exemplary. From the moment I purchased my unit in 2012, they have been my go-to strata management team, and their professionalism and accessibility have...”