Portfolio Profile
Lot Types
Residential 19,374 (89%)
Commercial 1,179 (5%)
Utility 1,232 (6%)
Other 106 (0%)
Scheme Size Distribution
Distribution of schemes by total lot count. Average scheme size: 18.2 lots. The portfolio is dominated by small schemes (10 lots or fewer), typical of townhouse and villa complexes.
Portfolio Age
Schemes by registration decade. Oldest scheme registered 1961, newest 2023.
Suburb Coverage
| Suburb | Schemes | Lots | % of Portfolio | Market Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cronulla 2230 | 95 | 1,375 | 8% | 10.9% | |
| Hurstville 2220 | 68 | 1,137 | 6% | 14.0% | |
| Bexley 2207 | 57 | 671 | 5% | 15.3% | |
| Kogarah 2217 | 55 | 996 | 5% | 16.9% | |
| Brighton-Le-Sands 2216 | 50 | 870 | 4% | 24.6% | |
| Penshurst 2222 | 45 | 587 | 4% | 17.0% | |
| Rockdale 2216 | 44 | 993 | 4% | 23.5% | |
| Mortdale 2223 | 37 | 409 | 3% | 14.5% | |
| Carlton 2218 | 32 | 376 | 3% | 17.0% | |
| Caringbah 2229 | 29 | 267 | 2% | 6.6% |
| Allawah 2218 | 24 | 245 | 2% | 13.6% | |
| Sans Souci 2219 | 21 | 365 | 2% | 8.7% | |
| Maroubra 2035 | 20 | 242 | 2% | 3.1% | |
| Randwick 2031 | 19 | 286 | 2% | 2.3% | |
| Oatley 2223 | 19 | 167 | 2% | 11.0% | |
| Hillsdale 2036 | 18 | 266 | 2% | 9.0% | |
| Monterey 2217 | 17 | 276 | 1% | 14.7% | |
| Arncliffe 2205 | 17 | 237 | 1% | 18.5% | |
| Ramsgate Beach 2217 | 16 | 301 | 1% | 19.3% | |
| Darlinghurst 2010 | 14 | 1,703 | 1% | 3.9% | |
| Kensington 2033 | 13 | 226 | 1% | 5.9% | |
| Miranda 2228 | 13 | 242 | 1% | 3.7% | |
| Sylvania 2224 | 12 | 216 | 1% | 6.2% | |
| Kirrawee 2232 | 11 | 330 | 1% | 3.7% | |
| Dolls Point 2219 | 11 | 212 | 1% | 21.6% | |
| Sutherland 2232 | 11 | 277 | 1% | 4.5% | |
| Menai 2234 | 11 | 249 | 1% | 14.7% | |
| Lakemba 2195 | 11 | 134 | 1% | 3.0% | |
| Gymea 2227 | 11 | 120 | 1% | 5.2% | |
| North Sydney 2060 | 10 | 575 | 1% | 4.0% | |
| Riverwood 2210 | 10 | 121 | 1% | 9.2% | |
| Marrickville 2204 | 10 | 107 | 1% | 3.1% | |
| Wiley Park 2195 | 10 | 100 | 1% | 4.9% | |
| Botany 2019 | 9 | 159 | 1% | 5.7% | |
| Kingsgrove 2208 | 9 | 198 | 1% | 13.4% | |
| Kingsford 2032 | 9 | 92 | 1% | 4.1% | |
| Peakhurst 2210 | 9 | 76 | 1% | 4.5% | |
| Belmore 2192 | 9 | 85 | 1% | 4.4% | |
| Coogee 2034 | 9 | 76 | 1% | 1.3% | |
| Ashfield 2131 | 8 | 117 | 1% | 1.8% | |
| Bondi 2026 | 8 | 162 | 1% | 2.6% | |
| South Hurstville 2221 | 8 | 75 | 1% | 6.8% | |
| Bondi Beach 2026 | 7 | 62 | 1% | 1.4% | |
| Canterbury 2193 | 6 | 160 | 0% | 6.0% | |
| Elizabeth Bay 2011 | 6 | 521 | 0% | 3.8% | |
| Strathfield 2135 | 6 | 150 | 0% | 2.6% | |
| Revesby 2212 | 6 | 76 | 0% | 3.3% | |
| Narwee 2209 | 6 | 86 | 0% | 6.6% | |
| Woolooware 2230 | 6 | 57 | 0% | 4.2% | |
| Beverly Hills 2209 | 6 | 49 | 0% | 6.5% | |
| Potts Point 2011 | 5 | 285 | 0% | 2.5% | |
| Alexandria 2015 | 5 | 120 | 0% | 2.7% | |
| Bradbury 2560 | 5 | 250 | 0% | 26.3% | |
| Engadine 2233 | 5 | 66 | 0% | 3.1% | |
| Bellevue Hill 2023 | 5 | 56 | 0% | 1.2% | |
| Caringbah South 2229 | 5 | 39 | 0% | 1.3% | |
| Redfern 2016 | 5 | 63 | 0% | 4.0% | |
| Westmead 2145 | 5 | 49 | 0% | 1.8% | |
| Mascot 2020 | 5 | 62 | 0% | 3.8% | |
| Clovelly 2031 | 5 | 59 | 0% | 3.4% | |
| Paddington 2021 | 4 | 135 | 0% | 3.9% | |
| Dulwich Hill 2203 | 4 | 98 | 0% | 1.9% | |
| Campsie 2194 | 4 | 62 | 0% | 0.8% | |
| Padstow 2211 | 4 | 61 | 0% | 1.7% | |
| Newtown 2042 | 4 | 63 | 0% | 2.9% | |
| Jannali 2226 | 4 | 43 | 0% | 4.6% | |
| Eastlakes 2018 | 4 | 54 | 0% | 3.5% | |
| Sandringham 2219 | 4 | 47 | 0% | 19.0% | |
| Roselands 2196 | 4 | 53 | 0% | 4.4% | |
| Loftus 2232 | 4 | 22 | 0% | 8.3% | |
| Campbelltown 2560 | 3 | 276 | 0% | 1.4% | |
| Bankstown 2200 | 3 | 104 | 0% | 0.7% | |
| Heathcote 2233 | 3 | 47 | 0% | 5.0% | |
| Summer Hill 2130 | 3 | 52 | 0% | 2.0% | |
| Balmain 2041 | 3 | 36 | 0% | 2.4% | |
| Milsons Point 2061 | 3 | 48 | 0% | 5.2% | |
| Matraville 2036 | 3 | 27 | 0% | 2.0% | |
| Woollahra 2025 | 3 | 35 | 0% | 1.6% | |
| Taren Point 2229 | 3 | 29 | 0% | 5.7% | |
| Jindabyne 2627 | 3 | 20 | 0% | 1.0% | |
| Connells Point 2221 | 3 | 24 | 0% | 7.5% | |
| Rose Bay 2029 | 3 | 18 | 0% | 0.6% | |
| Earlwood 2206 | 3 | 20 | 0% | 4.1% | |
| Sydney 2000 | 2 | 766 | 0% | 0.4% | |
| Penrith 2750 | 2 | 93 | 0% | 0.5% | |
| Rozelle 2039 | 2 | 55 | 0% | 1.6% | |
| Double Bay 2028 | 2 | 70 | 0% | 0.9% | |
| Parramatta 2150 | 2 | 40 | 0% | 0.4% | |
| Ramsgate 2217 | 2 | 44 | 0% | 8.7% | |
| Hurstville Grove 2220 | 2 | 31 | 0% | 8.3% | |
| Enmore 2042 | 2 | 32 | 0% | 6.5% | |
| Wollstonecraft 2065 | 2 | 36 | 0% | 0.7% | |
| Petersham 2049 | 2 | 26 | 0% | 1.9% | |
| Wolli Creek 2205 | 2 | 27 | 0% | 3.0% | |
| Bardwell Park 2207 | 2 | 32 | 0% | 18.2% | |
| Stanmore 2048 | 2 | 21 | 0% | 1.1% | |
| Mosman 2088 | 2 | 25 | 0% | 0.2% | |
| Waverley 2024 | 2 | 17 | 0% | 2.5% | |
| Condell Park 2200 | 2 | 24 | 0% | 1.1% | |
| Bardwell Valley 2207 | 2 | 20 | 0% | 7.4% | |
| Concord 2137 | 2 | 13 | 0% | 1.1% | |
| Burraneer 2230 | 2 | 7 | 0% | 2.9% | |
| Haymarket 2000 | 1 | 163 | 0% | 1.8% | |
| Pyrmont 2009 | 1 | 140 | 0% | 0.9% | |
| Manly 2095 | 1 | 93 | 0% | 0.1% | |
| Birchgrove 2041 | 1 | 45 | 0% | 2.9% | |
| Banksia 2216 | 1 | 42 | 0% | 16.7% | |
| St Peters 2044 | 1 | 42 | 0% | 2.4% | |
| Sylvania Waters 2224 | 1 | 40 | 0% | 10.0% | |
| Crows Nest 2065 | 1 | 37 | 0% | 0.6% | |
| Chatswood 2067 | 1 | 32 | 0% | 0.3% | |
| Yagoona 2199 | 1 | 24 | 0% | 0.9% | |
| West Ryde 2114 | 1 | 24 | 0% | 0.3% | |
| Cammeray 2062 | 1 | 21 | 0% | 0.3% | |
| Greenwich 2065 | 1 | 21 | 0% | 1.3% | |
| Five Dock 2046 | 1 | 19 | 0% | 0.8% | |
| Vaucluse 2030 | 1 | 18 | 0% | 0.4% | |
| Edgecliff 2027 | 1 | 18 | 0% | 1.3% | |
| Rushcutters Bay 2011 | 1 | 17 | 0% | 1.2% | |
| Beverley Park 2217 | 1 | 17 | 0% | 8.3% | |
| Croydon 2132 | 1 | 16 | 0% | 1.3% | |
| Lewisham 2049 | 1 | 15 | 0% | 2.3% | |
| Camperdown 2050 | 1 | 15 | 0% | 1.0% | |
| Glebe 2037 | 1 | 14 | 0% | 0.8% | |
| Centennial Park 2021 | 1 | 14 | 0% | 1.9% | |
| Homebush 2140 | 1 | 14 | 0% | 0.9% | |
| Woolloomooloo 2011 | 1 | 13 | 0% | 1.3% | |
| Neutral Bay 2089 | 1 | 12 | 0% | 0.2% | |
| Leumeah 2560 | 1 | 12 | 0% | 1.4% | |
| Burwood 2134 | 1 | 12 | 0% | 0.4% | |
| Guildford 2161 | 1 | 12 | 0% | 0.5% | |
| Hunters Hill 2110 | 1 | 11 | 0% | 0.7% | |
| Haberfield 2045 | 1 | 11 | 0% | 4.5% | |
| Picton 2571 | 1 | 10 | 0% | 3.1% | |
| Fairfield East 2165 | 1 | 10 | 0% | 4.8% | |
| Surry Hills 2010 | 1 | 10 | 0% | 0.4% | |
| Erskineville 2043 | 1 | 10 | 0% | 1.3% | |
| Kyeemagh 2216 | 1 | 10 | 0% | 14.3% | |
| Forest Lodge 2037 | 1 | 9 | 0% | 2.6% | |
| Macquarie Fields 2564 | 1 | 9 | 0% | 0.9% | |
| Minto 2566 | 1 | 9 | 0% | 1.1% | |
| Ryde 2112 | 1 | 9 | 0% | 0.2% | |
| Cremorne Point 2090 | 1 | 8 | 0% | 0.6% | |
| Tempe 2044 | 1 | 8 | 0% | 5.6% | |
| Auburn 2144 | 1 | 8 | 0% | 0.2% | |
| Pendle Hill 2145 | 1 | 8 | 0% | 1.3% | |
| Greenacre 2190 | 1 | 8 | 0% | 0.6% | |
| Bexley North 2207 | 1 | 7 | 0% | 3.8% | |
| Balmain East 2041 | 1 | 7 | 0% | 2.6% | |
| Queenscliff 2096 | 1 | 7 | 0% | 0.6% | |
| East Hills 2213 | 1 | 7 | 0% | 3.0% | |
| North Bondi 2026 | 1 | 7 | 0% | 0.3% | |
| Bangor 2234 | 1 | 7 | 0% | 3.8% | |
| Belfield 2191 | 1 | 6 | 0% | 1.7% | |
| Kirribilli 2061 | 1 | 6 | 0% | 0.5% | |
| Huntleys Cove 2111 | 1 | 6 | 0% | 4.5% | |
| Girraween 2145 | 1 | 6 | 0% | 0.7% | |
| Waverton 2060 | 1 | 5 | 0% | 0.8% | |
| Beaconsfield 2015 | 1 | 5 | 0% | 5.3% | |
| Bronte 2024 | 1 | 4 | 0% | 0.6% | |
| Chifley 2036 | 1 | 4 | 0% | 1.4% | |
| Prestons 2170 | 1 | 4 | 0% | 0.6% | |
| Seven Hills 2147 | 1 | 4 | 0% | 0.7% | |
| Como 2226 | 1 | 3 | 0% | 3.8% | |
| Blakehurst 2221 | 1 | 3 | 0% | 2.0% | |
| Coffs Harbour 2450 | 1 | 2 | 0% | 0.1% | |
| Smithfield 2164 | 1 | 2 | 0% | 1.1% |
Tribunal & Court History
5
Total Cases
5
NCAT
0.2
Adverse per 100 Schemes
0.4
Total per 100 Schemes
5 cases since 2021. Of these, 2 resulted in substantive orders. The remaining 3 were dismissed, withdrawn, settled, or involved the OC as applicant.
Orders Made 3
Dismissed 2
An applicant sought orders for repairs, a compulsory strata manager, and other orders related to the strata scheme. The tribunal dismissed the appeal of the original orders made by the tribunal, and also declined to extend the time to file the appeal.
APPEALS – appeals in respect of interlocutory decisions involving matters of practice and procedure
Before
S de Jersey, Principal Member R C Titterton OAM, Senior Member
Hearing
3 November 2025
File Numbers
2025/00283047
Matched Strata Plans
SP1260
Parties
Lot Owner v Owners Corporation
Representation
Appellant (Self-represented) R Kandy (Respondent)
Orders
(1) The application to extend the time for filing the Notice of Appeal in respect of what we have described as orders (1) to (5) of the Tribunal of 29 May 2025 in proceedings 2025/00036988 and proceedings 2025/00126110 is refused, and the appeal otherwise dismissed. (2) To the extent that the appellant raises a question of law in respect of to what we have described as Order (6), being Order (3) of the Tribunal made on 15 July 2025 in proceedings 2025/00036988 and proceedings 2025/00126110,...
The applicant sought an order for costs after the parties reached a settlement regarding building defects. The tribunal decided that the respondents had acted reasonably, and therefore each party should pay their own costs. The case was about whether the respondent was liable for the building defects.
COSTS – Work order made by consent – No decision on the merits – No unreasonable behaviour by respondent warranting an order for costs
Before
Graham Ellis SC, Senior Member
Hearing
20 January 2022 (on the papers)
File Numbers
HB 20/20800
Matched Strata Plans
SP96841
Parties
Owners Corporation v Developer
Representation
Counsel: Mr C Mobellan (Applicant) Mr W Marshall (First Respondent) Solicitors: Nexus Lawyers (Applicant) Kydon Segal Lawyers (Respondent)
Orders
1. The Tribunal dispenses with a hearing on the question of costs, pursuant to s 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013. 2. Each party is the pay their own costs of the application.
An appeal was made regarding an interlocutory decision about standing to bring a claim. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal. The respondent sought a specific costs order, which was not granted. The Tribunal made no order as to the costs of the appeal.
APPEAL — NCAT— costs - determination of a separate interlocutory question by Tribunal sought by appellants and opposed by respondent - appellants unsuccessful before Tribunal - appellants unsuccessful on appeal - finding of special circumstances - respondent not seeking an order for his costs -...
Before
A Suthers, Principal Member M Gracie, Senior Member
Hearing
On the papers
File Numbers
2020/00370897 (AP 20/29492)
Matched Strata Plans
SP3740
Parties
Lot Owner v Lot Owner
Representation
Solicitors: Strata Title Lawyers (Appellants) Respondent (Self-Represented)
Orders
1. Order under s 50 (2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) to dispense with a hearing of the respondent's application in respect of costs. 2. Make no order as to the costs of the appeal.
The applicant sought to reallocate unit entitlements, and the tribunal made orders to do so. The appellant appealed against this decision. The tribunal dismissed the appeal and upheld the reallocation, finding that the original allocation was unreasonable.
LAND LAW- Strata title- reallocation of unit entitlements - unreasonable initial allocation - application by owners corporation - requirement for a certificate of valuation - hardship to lot owner - restitutio in integrum -.
Before
S Westgarth, Deputy President D Robertson, Senior Member
Hearing
28 January 2021
File Numbers
2020/00371082 (AP 20/42504)
Matched Strata Plans
SP2022
Parties
Owners Corporation v Lot Owner
Representation
Counsel: Dr R O’Hair (Appellant) D Knoll AM (Respondent) Solicitors: Grace Lawyers (Respondent)
Orders
1. Appeal dismissed. 2. Within 21 days of the publication of these orders the Respondent may file and serve evidence and submissions in support of an order for costs of the appeal. 3. Within 21 days thereafter the Appellant may file and serve submissions with evidence in opposition to the Respondent’s application for an order for costs of the appeal. 4. The submissions of the parties shall include submissions as to whether the Appeal Panel may decide the question of costs of the appeal on...
The applicant appealed an interlocutory decision. The tribunal found the original decision, which dismissed parts of the respondent's application, was made outside the scope of the original hearing. The tribunal granted leave to appeal and quashed the initial orders, with the respondent being awarded costs.
APPEAL — NCAT— leave to appeal from interlocutory decision of Consumer and Commercial Division - question of law - leave to appeal STRATA SCHEMES - interlocutory question - application under s 238 Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 - whether "interested person" under s 226 Strata Schemes...
Before
A Suthers, Principal Member M Gracie, Senior Member
Hearing
29 September 2020
File Numbers
2020/00370897 (AP 20/29492)
Matched Strata Plans
SP3740
Parties
Lot Owner v Lot Owner
Representation
Solicitors: Strata Title Lawyers (Appellants) Respondent (Self-Represented)
Orders
(1) Grant leave to appeal. (2) Orders 2 and 3 of the Tribunal's Reasons for Decision dated 10 June 2020 are quashed. (3) The appeal is dismissed. (4) Provisionally order that the costs of the appeal shall be the respondent's costs in the substantive proceedings. (5) The provisional costs order in order (4) above will become final 14 days after these Reasons are published, unless a party notifies the Registry and the other party in writing that some other costs order is sought and if so,...