Portfolio Profile
Lot Types
Residential 1,464 (47%)
Commercial 43 (1%)
Retirement 1,624 (52%)
Scheme Size Distribution
Distribution of schemes by total lot count. Average scheme size: 38.2 lots. The portfolio is dominated by small schemes (10 lots or fewer), typical of townhouse and villa complexes.
Portfolio Age
Schemes by registration decade. Oldest scheme registered 1971, newest 2024.
Suburb Coverage
| Suburb | Schemes | Lots | % of Portfolio | Market Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baulkham Hills 2153 | 12 | 178 | 15% | 5.6% | |
| Dural 2158 | 9 | 1,641 | 11% | 15.0% | |
| North Strathfield 2137 | 4 | 126 | 5% | 4.8% | |
| Drummoyne 2047 | 3 | 78 | 4% | 1.1% | |
| Parramatta 2150 | 3 | 39 | 4% | 0.6% | |
| Merrylands 2160 | 2 | 196 | 2% | 0.5% | |
| Newington 2127 | 2 | 91 | 2% | 8.7% | |
| Croydon Park 2133 | 2 | 82 | 2% | 1.6% | |
| Gladesville 2111 | 2 | 58 | 2% | 0.8% | |
| Marsfield 2122 | 2 | 35 | 2% | 1.5% |
| Girraween 2145 | 2 | 17 | 2% | 1.4% | |
| East Gosford 2250 | 2 | 7 | 2% | 0.9% | |
| Ryde 2112 | 1 | 82 | 1% | 0.2% | |
| East Tamworth 2340 | 1 | 42 | 1% | 1.5% | |
| Warrawee 2074 | 1 | 41 | 1% | 6.2% | |
| Northmead 2152 | 1 | 33 | 1% | 1.0% | |
| Marayong 2148 | 1 | 31 | 1% | 5.3% | |
| Castle Hill 2154 | 1 | 28 | 1% | 0.4% | |
| Fairfield 2165 | 1 | 26 | 1% | 0.4% | |
| Rosehill 2142 | 1 | 24 | 1% | 1.7% | |
| Westmead 2145 | 1 | 22 | 1% | 0.4% | |
| Pendle Hill 2145 | 1 | 18 | 1% | 1.3% | |
| Kellyville Ridge 2155 | 1 | 18 | 1% | 5.9% | |
| North Rocks 2151 | 1 | 17 | 1% | 2.9% | |
| Thornleigh 2120 | 1 | 16 | 1% | 1.2% | |
| Harris Park 2150 | 1 | 16 | 1% | 0.7% | |
| Kellyville 2155 | 1 | 13 | 1% | 3.3% | |
| Lilyfield 2040 | 1 | 13 | 1% | 1.4% | |
| Rhodes 2138 | 1 | 12 | 1% | 1.1% | |
| Birmingham Gardens 2287 | 1 | 11 | 1% | 3.2% | |
| Wentworthville 2145 | 1 | 10 | 1% | 0.3% | |
| Speers Point 2284 | 1 | 10 | 1% | 2.8% | |
| Greystanes 2145 | 1 | 10 | 1% | 2.6% | |
| Berowra 2081 | 1 | 10 | 1% | 5.0% | |
| St Ives 2075 | 1 | 10 | 1% | 0.8% | |
| Winston Hills 2153 | 1 | 8 | 1% | 5.0% | |
| Cherrybrook 2126 | 1 | 7 | 1% | 0.8% | |
| Long Jetty 2261 | 1 | 6 | 1% | 0.5% | |
| St Marys 2760 | 1 | 6 | 1% | 0.3% | |
| Cambridge Park 2747 | 1 | 6 | 1% | 0.7% | |
| Enfield 2136 | 1 | 6 | 1% | 2.9% | |
| Riverwood 2210 | 1 | 6 | 1% | 0.9% | |
| North St Marys 2760 | 1 | 6 | 1% | 3.2% | |
| North Parramatta 2151 | 1 | 5 | 1% | 0.3% | |
| Watanobbi 2259 | 1 | 3 | 1% | 5.6% | |
| Pennant Hills 2120 | 1 | 3 | 1% | 1.6% | |
| Lane Cove North 2066 | 1 | 3 | 1% | 0.5% | |
| Terrigal 2260 | 1 | 3 | 1% | 0.2% | |
| Toukley 2263 | 1 | 2 | 1% | 1.5% |
Tribunal & Court History
2
Total Cases
2
NCAT
2 cases on record. None resulted in adverse findings.
The owners corporation sought an order for the respondents to remove a carport constructed on common property without approval. The Tribunal decided that the carport breached by-laws and relevant legislation, and ordered its removal and repair of any damage. The respondents were also in breach of the EPA Act.
LAND LAW — Strata title — orders to settle disputes or to rectify complaints — construction of carport by lot owners on common property LAND LAW — Strata title — common property — additions and alterations to common property by lot owners — unauthorised works on common property — installation of...
Before
JA Rose, Senior Member
Hearing
24 June 2025 and 5 September 2025
File Numbers
2025/00078564
Matched Strata Plans
SP85119
Parties
Owners Corporation v Lot Owner
Representation
Ms S Wyatt, Strata Managing Agent (Applicant) Mr P Patel, in person (Respondents)
Orders
(1) The respondents must remove the carport constructed in and around the car space of the respondents’ lot and the common property of the strata scheme, including all associated pipework, cabling and conduits, within 28 days of the date these orders are made. The respondents must also repair, at their own cost, all damage caused to the common property by the installation or removal of the carport and those associated elements. (2) The owners corporation is granted leave pursuant to Schedule...
A lot owner sought compensation from the owners corporation for alleged breach of duty to maintain common property and resultant water damage to the lot. The tribunal dismissed the application after finding the owners corporation did not breach its duty to maintain common property.
REAL PROPERTY – STRATA MANAGEMENT – content of owners corporation’s strict duty of maintenance and repair – alleged loss of rent from alleged breach – not established on facts
Before
G K Burton SC, Senior Member
Hearing
22 April 2024 with written submissions to 6 June 2024
File Numbers
2023/00448561
Matched Strata Plans
SP88807
Parties
Lot Owner v Owners Corporation
Representation
Applicant in person for hearing Mr F Anwar, counsel, instructed by Sachs Gerace Lawyers (respondent)
Orders
1 Application dismissed. 2 Order as follows in respect of questions of costs: (1) Any costs application with further submissions and documents relating to questions of costs (including any application for a further hearing on costs) is to be filed and served on or before 10 September 2024. (2) Any submissions and documents relating to questions of costs in response are to be filed and served on or before 24 September 2024.
Google Reviews
18 Sep 2024
“We have been working with Craig, Annabelle, and the Strata Plus Newcastle team on both general and major structural projects for their properties for over a year. Compared to other strata management companies, they have been incredibly professional and easy to work with. We look forward to...”
26 Mar 2025
“Prompt & easy to deal with - after dealing with Craig of StrataPlus Newcastle regarding an owners corp matter, I have no hesitation in recommending this company to any strata scheme who requires a knowledgeable and genuinely helpful strata managing agent.”
29 Aug 2024
“We have recently painted the offices for the Stata Plus Newcastle team. Craig, Michael, Julieann & Annabelle were very easy going, understanding & friendly to work with. We know who we would choose as our Strata managers - Highly Recommend.”
03 Mar 2019
“The Strata Plus Newcastle are professional and approachable. The Team go above and beyond to meet the needs of the their Customers.
No problem is ever too big or small and their communication skills are excellent. We love they way they always keep us in the loop so we know exactly what is...”
08 Mar 2023
“Our company has been dealing with Michael and his great staff for over 7 years and couldn't be happier. It's nice to see a strata company who cares for their client and will take the time to listen to their needs.”