Executive Strata Pty Ltd
Executive Strata Pty Ltd manages around 60 strata schemes totalling 2,900 lots across NSW. With an average of around 45 lots per scheme, it specialises in larger buildings — more than double the state-wide average of around 20 lots. It has a broad geographic spread across 48 suburbs, with Bankstown as its largest market (11%). Its schemes have been involved in 5 tribunal and court decisions since 2021, none of which resulted in adverse findings.
Counts (~) are rounded figures sourced from the NSW StrataHub register. Figures may include duplication in staged or mixed-use developments and reflect data at the time of the last register extract.
Portfolio
89% residential
SCA NSW
Not listed
Fair Trading
✓ Not on register
Scheme Decisions
5 in portfolio since 2021
Portfolio Profile
Lot Types
Residential 89%
Commercial 9%
Utility 1%
Other 1%
Scheme Size Distribution
Distribution of schemes by total lot count. Average scheme size: 45.0 lots. The portfolio is dominated by small schemes (10 lots or fewer), typical of townhouse and villa complexes.
Portfolio Age
Schemes by registration decade. Oldest scheme registered 1965, newest 2024.
Suburb Coverage
| Suburb | Schemes | Lots | % of Portfolio | Market Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bankstown 2200 | 7 | 315 | 11% | 1.6% | |
| Collaroy 2097 | 4 | 10 | 6% | 2.5% | |
| Baulkham Hills 2153 | 3 | 35 | 5% | 1.4% | |
| Parramatta 2150 | 2 | 446 | 3% | 0.4% | |
| Cromer 2099 | 2 | 220 | 3% | 3.9% | |
| Auburn 2144 | 2 | 92 | 3% | 0.4% | |
| Blacktown 2148 | 2 | 108 | 3% | 0.4% | |
| Warwick Farm 2170 | 2 | 62 | 3% | 2.7% | |
| Bellevue Hill 2023 | 2 | 21 | 3% | 0.5% | |
| Mortlake 2137 | 1 | 271 | 2% | 2.6% |
| Rouse Hill 2155 | 1 | 256 | 2% | 1.9% | |
| Waterloo 2017 | 1 | 111 | 2% | 0.9% | |
| Parklea 2768 | 1 | 98 | 2% | 50.0% | |
| Mascot 2020 | 1 | 86 | 2% | 0.8% | |
| Dulwich Hill 2203 | 1 | 74 | 2% | 0.5% | |
| Chippendale 2008 | 1 | 68 | 2% | 1.3% | |
| Campbelltown 2560 | 1 | 58 | 2% | 0.4% | |
| Westmead 2145 | 1 | 55 | 2% | 0.4% | |
| Crows Nest 2065 | 1 | 53 | 2% | 0.6% | |
| North Rocks 2151 | 1 | 50 | 2% | 2.6% | |
| Alexandria 2015 | 1 | 46 | 2% | 0.6% | |
| Canterbury 2193 | 1 | 42 | 2% | 1.0% | |
| Gladesville 2111 | 1 | 39 | 2% | 0.4% | |
| North Narrabeen 2101 | 1 | 38 | 2% | 4.0% | |
| Hornsby 2077 | 1 | 34 | 2% | 0.3% | |
| Mosman 2088 | 1 | 28 | 2% | 0.1% | |
| Beecroft 2119 | 1 | 19 | 2% | 2.0% | |
| Redfern 2016 | 1 | 19 | 2% | 0.4% | |
| Balgowlah 2093 | 1 | 17 | 2% | 0.3% | |
| Toongabbie 2146 | 1 | 17 | 2% | 0.7% | |
| Croydon 2132 | 1 | 13 | 2% | 1.3% | |
| Randwick 2031 | 1 | 11 | 2% | 0.1% | |
| Castle Hill 2154 | 1 | 10 | 2% | 0.3% | |
| Cheltenham 2119 | 1 | 10 | 2% | 14.3% | |
| Maroubra 2035 | 1 | 10 | 2% | 0.2% | |
| Naremburn 2065 | 1 | 9 | 2% | 1.0% | |
| Willoughby 2068 | 1 | 9 | 2% | 1.5% | |
| Miranda 2228 | 1 | 8 | 2% | 0.2% | |
| Warriewood 2102 | 1 | 8 | 2% | 1.3% | |
| Surry Hills 2010 | 1 | 8 | 2% | 0.4% | |
| Bexley 2207 | 1 | 7 | 2% | 0.3% | |
| Sutherland 2232 | 1 | 6 | 2% | 0.4% | |
| Ryde 2112 | 1 | 6 | 2% | 0.2% | |
| Homebush 2140 | 1 | 6 | 2% | 0.9% | |
| Fairlight 2094 | 1 | 5 | 2% | 0.4% | |
| Moorebank 2170 | 1 | 4 | 2% | 0.8% | |
| Rose Bay 2029 | 1 | 4 | 2% | 0.2% | |
| Neutral Bay 2089 | 1 | 3 | 2% | 0.2% |
Tribunal & Court History
5
Scheme Decisions
1
NCAT
4
Supreme Court
0.0
Manager Adverse / 100
7.7
Total per 100 Schemes
5 tribunal or court decisions in managed schemes since 2021. In none of these was Executive Strata Pty Ltd named as a party — all involved schemes they manage. No adverse findings against the manager.
Orders Made 4
Dismissed 1
Building defects 2
Insurance 1
The Owners Corporation sought indemnity under an insurance policy for building defects. The court found that the claims were made outside the policy's time limitations. The court answered 'no' to all questions, effectively dismissing the Owners Corporation's claims.
BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION – Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) – insurance – construction of home warranty insurance policy – separate questions – whether letter sent in 2012 constitutes a claim under the policy – whether letters sent in 2022 constitute claims within time under the policy – effect of...
Before
Stevenson J
Hearing
28 April 2025; further written submissions 6 May 2025
File Numbers
2013/386026
Matched Strata Plans
SP81376
Parties
Owners Corporation v Third Party
Representation
Counsel: M A Ashhurst SC / D S Allen (Plaintiff) M R Pesman SC (Third Defendant) Solicitors: Bannermans Lawyers (Plaintiff) Mills Oakley (Third Defendant)
Orders
Separate questions each answered “no”
The applicant sought damages from the respondent (Kazzi) related to interest incurred on borrowings due to building defects. The tribunal determined that the applicant was entitled to this interest, and the order was made. This was due to the respondent's admitted breach of duty under the DBP Act.
JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS – interest – award of as damages – Hungerfords interest damages – where breach of duty under Design and Building Practitioners Act 2020 admitted in relation to two defects – where such breaches caused delay in registration of strata plan and thus delay in sales of units...
Before
Stevenson J
Hearing
6 July 2023; further written submissions 14 and 21 July 2023
File Numbers
2020/7703
Matched Strata Plans
SP86807
Parties
Owners Corporation v Developer
Representation
Counsel: A Cameron (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendants) J Horowitz (Defendants/Cross-Claimants) Solicitors: Fortis Law Pty Limited (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendants) Domain Legal Pty Limited (Defendants/Cross-Claimants)
Orders
Cross-claimants entitled to Hungerfords damages as against second cross-defendant
The Owners Corporation sought leave to amend its claim against the builder of the strata development in relation to cladding installed on the building's facade. The tribunal granted leave to amend, but required the Owners Corporation to provide an expert report about the cladding. The Owners Corporation was ordered to pay part of the builder's costs.
CIVIL PROCEDURE — Originating process — Amendment — claim under Design and Building Practitioners Act 2020 (NSW) — Where no evidence of non-compliance with the Building Code of Australia — Discretionary matters — Where delay in bringing application — Where no evidence of irremediable prejudice —...
Before
Ball J
Hearing
5 May 2023
File Numbers
2016/365684
Matched Strata Plans
SP86807
Parties
Owners Corporation v Developer
Representation
Counsel: T Lynch SC with DJ Byrne (Plaintiff) DS Weinberger (Defendants) Solicitors: DEA Lawyers (Plaintiff) Dentons (Defendants)
Orders
(1) Leave be given to the plaintiff to file an amended technology and construction list statement in the form provided to my Associate on 1 May 2023 (the List Statement); (2) Order (1) is subject to the plaintiff by 15 June 2023 filing and serving a report from Credwell Consulting or some other suitably qualified expert which expresses the opinion that the Cladded Walls (as defined in the List Statement) do not comply with the Building Code of Australia 2012 for the reasons set out in...
An owners corporation sought to amend its claim against the developer and builder regarding building defects, specifically cladding. The tribunal dismissed the motion to amend the Home Building Act claim due to lack of evidence and delay, and the Design and Building Practitioners Act claim because it was inadequately pleaded. The court ordered the owners corporation to file a new pleading and set a timetable for the defendants to respond.
CIVIL PROCEDURE — Originating process — Amendment — Disallowance of amendment — claim under the Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) s18B CIVIL PROCEDURE — Originating process — Amendment — Disallowance of amendment — claim under Design and Building Practitioners Act 2020 (NSW) — opportunity to replead
Before
Ball J
Hearing
13 December 2022
File Numbers
2016/365684
Matched Strata Plans
SP86807
Parties
Owners Corporation v Developer
Representation
Counsel: TW Lynch SC with D Byrne (Applicant | Plaintiff) D Weinberger (Defendants | Respondents) Solicitors: DEA Lawyers (Applicant | Plaintiff) Dentons Australia (Defendants | Respondents)
Orders
(1) Order that the further amended notice of motion filed in court on 13 December 2022 be dismissed with costs; (2) Direct that by 3 March 2023 the plaintiff serve on the defendants any proposed amended summons and amended list statement that includes a claim against the first defendant under the Design and Building Practitioners Act 2020 (NSW); (3) Direct that by 10 March 2023 the defendants notify the plaintiff whether it objects to the filing of any such amended document; (4) If the...
The applicants sought the appointment of a strata managing agent to facilitate building works. The Tribunal ruled in favour of the applicants, finding that the respondents acted unreasonably by opposing the appointment. As a result, the Tribunal ordered the respondents to pay the applicant's costs.
Compulsory manager sought but refused: The Tribunal found that Burbank and Gornoa acted unreasonably in opposing the appointment of a strata managing agent, leading to the case.
COSTS – Whether there are special circumstances warranting an award of costs
Before
G Blake AM SC, Senior Member
Hearing
On the papers
File Numbers
SC 20/22723; SC 20/32508
Matched Strata Plans
SP85312
Parties
Lot Owner v Developer
Representation
Counsel: D Knoll AM (First, Second and Third Applicants) Solicitors: Strata Specialist Lawyers (First, Second and Third Applicants) Priority Business Lawyers (Second and Third Respondents)
Orders
(1) A hearing is dispensed with in relation to the costs of proceedings SC 20/22723 and proceedings SC 20/32508. (2) The second and third respondents are to pay the costs of the first, second and third applicants of proceedings SC 20/22723 and proceedings SC 20/32508 as agreed or assessed.
Frequently Asked Questions
- How many strata schemes does Executive Strata Pty Ltd manage in NSW?
- Executive Strata Pty Ltd manages around 60 strata schemes (around 2,900 total lots) across 48 suburbs in New South Wales, based on the NSW StrataHub register.
- What areas does Executive Strata Pty Ltd provide strata management in?
- Executive Strata Pty Ltd is most active in Bankstown, Collaroy, Baulkham Hills, covering 48 suburbs across NSW in total.
- Does Executive Strata Pty Ltd specialise in residential or commercial strata?
- Executive Strata Pty Ltd manages primarily residential (89% residential, 9% commercial).
- What is the average scheme size managed by Executive Strata Pty Ltd?
- Executive Strata Pty Ltd manages schemes averaging 45 lots each, compared to the NSW state average of approximately 20 lots per scheme.
- Is Executive Strata Pty Ltd a member of Strata Community Association (SCA) NSW?
- Based on the SCA NSW online directory, Executive Strata Pty Ltd does not appear as a current member.
- Does Executive Strata Pty Ltd have any NSW Fair Trading enforcement actions?
- Executive Strata Pty Ltd does not appear on the NSW Fair Trading Name and Shame Register, indicating no recorded enforcement actions as of our last data update.
- How many NCAT or court cases involve schemes managed by Executive Strata Pty Ltd?
- 5 tribunal or court cases involving schemes managed by Executive Strata Pty Ltd appear in NSW caselaw records since 2021.
- What is Executive Strata Pty Ltd's NSW strata management licence number?
- Executive Strata Pty Ltd's NSW licence number is 10027071, issued under the Property and Stock Agents Act 2002.