Portfolio Profile
Lot Types
Residential 890 (92%)
Commercial 48 (5%)
Utility 32 (3%)
Scheme Size Distribution
Distribution of schemes by total lot count. Average scheme size: 14.3 lots. The portfolio is dominated by small schemes (10 lots or fewer), typical of townhouse and villa complexes.
Portfolio Age
Schemes by registration decade. Oldest scheme registered 1964, newest 2023.
Suburb Coverage
| Suburb | Schemes | Lots | % of Portfolio | Market Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bankstown 2200 | 4 | 49 | 6% | 0.9% | |
| Campsie 2194 | 4 | 49 | 6% | 0.8% | |
| North Strathfield 2137 | 3 | 60 | 4% | 3.6% | |
| Parramatta 2150 | 3 | 55 | 4% | 0.6% | |
| Guildford 2161 | 3 | 16 | 4% | 1.6% | |
| Belfield 2191 | 2 | 67 | 3% | 3.4% | |
| Chatswood 2067 | 2 | 50 | 3% | 0.6% | |
| Lakemba 2195 | 2 | 32 | 3% | 0.5% | |
| Kingsford 2032 | 2 | 27 | 3% | 0.9% | |
| Dundas 2117 | 2 | 25 | 3% | 3.4% |
| Lidcombe 2141 | 2 | 25 | 3% | 0.7% | |
| Ryde 2112 | 2 | 16 | 3% | 0.5% | |
| Bellevue Hill 2023 | 2 | 24 | 3% | 0.5% | |
| Punchbowl 2196 | 2 | 16 | 3% | 0.9% | |
| Ashfield 2131 | 2 | 14 | 3% | 0.4% | |
| Oxley Park 2760 | 2 | 10 | 3% | 1.3% | |
| Blacktown 2148 | 1 | 95 | 1% | 0.3% | |
| Burwood 2134 | 1 | 30 | 1% | 0.4% | |
| West Ryde 2114 | 1 | 24 | 1% | 0.3% | |
| Bexley 2207 | 1 | 24 | 1% | 0.3% | |
| Kogarah 2217 | 1 | 20 | 1% | 0.3% | |
| Eagle Vale 2558 | 1 | 18 | 1% | 2.3% | |
| Greenacre 2190 | 1 | 18 | 1% | 0.6% | |
| Homebush West 2140 | 1 | 16 | 1% | 0.7% | |
| Strathfield 2135 | 1 | 15 | 1% | 0.4% | |
| Schofields 2762 | 1 | 15 | 1% | 1.3% | |
| Camden 2570 | 1 | 14 | 1% | 2.2% | |
| Marsfield 2122 | 1 | 13 | 1% | 0.8% | |
| Berala 2141 | 1 | 12 | 1% | 0.9% | |
| Eastwood 2122 | 1 | 12 | 1% | 0.2% | |
| Mortdale 2223 | 1 | 12 | 1% | 0.4% | |
| Merrylands 2160 | 1 | 11 | 1% | 0.2% | |
| Campbelltown 2560 | 1 | 10 | 1% | 0.5% | |
| Carlton 2218 | 1 | 8 | 1% | 0.5% | |
| Croydon 2132 | 1 | 8 | 1% | 1.3% | |
| Ingleburn 2565 | 1 | 8 | 1% | 0.5% | |
| Wollongong 2500 | 1 | 8 | 1% | 0.1% | |
| South Wentworthville 2145 | 1 | 8 | 1% | 1.4% | |
| Haberfield 2045 | 1 | 6 | 1% | 4.5% | |
| Gladesville 2111 | 1 | 6 | 1% | 0.4% | |
| Enfield 2136 | 1 | 6 | 1% | 2.9% | |
| Hurlstone Park 2193 | 1 | 6 | 1% | 1.8% | |
| Croydon Park 2133 | 1 | 6 | 1% | 0.8% | |
| Maroubra 2035 | 1 | 3 | 1% | 0.2% | |
| Valentine 2280 | 1 | 3 | 1% | 1.2% |
Google Reviews
15 Jan 2026
“Unprofessional , unsympathetic, greedy and terrible at their job. We recently engaged the services of a new strata mgr for our building. Rather than managing the grievances maturity and professionally, Renae has threatened us with legal action and suing us for $270k. I do not recommend Area Strata mgt”
20 Nov 2025
“Area Strata was our strata managing agent for 2 years. Over 1.5 years it was a very poor, frustrating and challenging experience for our strata scheme 😵💫. The independently audited financial statements were not provided, despite the AGM motion and multiple requests from the strata committee....”
04 Oct 2023
“It's reassuring to know that we have a reliable partner in Area Strata Management.
I have shared my positive experience with fellow residents, and I will continue to recommend your services without hesitation. Keep up the great work!”
19 Jun 2025
“I’ve had excellent experiences with Area Strata. Their team is proactive, transparent, and always
responsive. Communication is clear, and they genuinely care about creating a well-managed, harmonious community.
They’re detail-oriented and quick to resolve issues—whether it’s maintenance,...”
24 Feb 2025
“Professional, knowledgeable and efficient.
Area Strata were recommended to our owner’s corp after more than 15 years with another strata company. I cannot endorse their services enough since we have changed over to their management. Our point of contact is Rene, who has gone so far above and...”