#280
of 459 Managers
21
Total Schemes
246
Total Lots
11.7
Avg Lots / Scheme
86%
AGM Compliance (avg 68%)

Portfolio Profile

Lot Types

Residential 178 (72%) Commercial 68 (28%)

Scheme Size Distribution

9
1-10
12
11-25
0
26-50
0
51-100
0
100+

Distribution of schemes by total lot count. Average scheme size: 11.7 lots. Most schemes fall in the 11–25 lot range, typical of small apartment blocks.

Portfolio Age

3
1960s
6
1970s
4
1980s
2
1990s
6
2000s

Schemes by registration decade. Oldest scheme registered 1965, newest 2005.

Suburb Coverage

Suburb Schemes Lots % of Portfolio Market Share
Wollstonecraft 2065 3 25 14% 1.0%
Lindfield 2070 2 32 10% 1.9%
Warriewood 2102 2 40 10% 2.6%
Frenchs Forest 2086 2 24 10% 3.5%
Lavender Bay 2060 1 22 5% 2.6%
Artarmon 2064 1 15 5% 0.6%
Killara 2071 1 14 5% 1.2%
North Narrabeen 2101 1 13 5% 4.2%
Newport 2106 1 12 5% 0.6%
Lane Cove 2066 1 12 5% 0.5%
Lane Cove North 2066 1 12 5% 0.5%
North Turramurra 2074 1 10 5% 5.6%
Cammeray 2062 1 5 5% 0.3%
Balgowlah 2093 1 4 5% 0.3%
Waitara 2077 1 4 5% 1.4%
Kirribilli 2061 1 2 5% 0.5%

Tribunal & Court History

1
Total Cases
1
NCAT

1 case on record. None resulted in adverse findings.

NCAT Dismissed Low [2025] NSWCATCD 65 2025-06-27
The applicant, a lot owner, sought to revoke an amendment to a by-law regarding noise levels from a hardwood floor in neighboring lots, claiming the amendment was a fraud on the minority and caused unreasonable noise. The tribunal found against the applicant and dismissed the application, determining that the amendment was valid and there was no breach of the by-laws. The tribunal decided that each party should bear their own costs.
By-law enforcementNoise & nuisance
LAND LAW – strata title – Strata Schemes Management Act 2014 (NSW) – amended by-law – whether amended by-law should be revoked – s 148 Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW) – noise transmission from lots – interference peaceful enjoyment – breach of by-laws – nuisance – s 153 Strata Schemes...
Before
G Sarginson, Deputy President
Hearing
15 January 2024; 20 August 2024; submissions to 11 November 2024
File Numbers
2023/00385204
Matched Strata Plans
SP16307
Parties
Lot Owner v Owners Corporation
Representation
Counsel: R. Gration (Applicant) J. Mee (First Respondent) J. Sleight (Second Respondent) Solicitors: Bugden Allen Graham Lawyers (First Respondent) GDP Law (Second Respondent)
Orders
(1) The application is dismissed. (2) No order as to costs, with a view that each party bears its own costs. (3) If any party seeks to vary order (2), the following orders apply: (a) Costs applicant is to file and serve costs submissions and documents by 14 days from the date of these orders. (b) Costs respondent is to file and serve costs submissions and documents by 28 days from the date of these orders. (c) Costs applicant is to file and serve costs submissions in reply by 35 days from...

Read full decision →

Google Reviews

1 ★ mel b 01 Sep 2025
“Can never get in contact with licencee in charge deb to resolve issues, wont ever call back. Will try to go against property owners until you bring up legislations. Maintenance completed in a uncompetent nor a proper manner. Give 2 day notice regarding maintenance. I would not recommend to...”
1 ★ Steve 26 Sep 2025
“WYONG Elite Strata - I would suggest avoiding this company like the plague. No customer service to owners, no replies to emails. Disgraceful attention to detail. Wanna be property managers, if you take pride in your home i would suggest looking elsewhere for management.”
1 ★ Jarrett Nottage 10 Feb 2025
“Elite strata Liverpool are a completely unreliable strata service, that do not share information with their tenants. Even when the tenants are waiting over a month for urgent repairs to take place. Disgusting & terrible to deal with, rude, hard to contact and above all- dnt have repairs fixed in...”
1 ★ Kristy Denne 21 Jul 2022
“My experience with Elite Strata has been very frustrating to say the least. They tend to make small necessary changes very difficult. Are not friendly and helpful, but talk down to you and make simple things complicated. I will never use them again, and recommend avoiding them at all cost.”
1 ★ kcik er 13 May 2020
“Please never use these people as your strata management. Their strata 'managers' never respond to emails, and after you chase them up several times they give you a 'general' answer to a question that you didn't even ask. Rude on the phone, and never return phone calls when you leave messages for them.”