Portfolio Profile
Lot Types
Residential 3,551 (90%)
Commercial 77 (2%)
Utility 282 (7%)
Other 43 (1%)
Scheme Size Distribution
Distribution of schemes by total lot count. Average scheme size: 12.6 lots. The portfolio is dominated by small schemes (10 lots or fewer), typical of townhouse and villa complexes.
Portfolio Age
Schemes by registration decade. Oldest scheme registered 1963, newest 2023.
Suburb Coverage
| Suburb | Schemes | Lots | % of Portfolio | Market Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drummoyne 2047 | 34 | 492 | 11% | 12.1% | |
| Ryde 2112 | 28 | 346 | 9% | 7.0% | |
| Hunters Hill 2110 | 13 | 162 | 4% | 8.9% | |
| Coogee 2034 | 13 | 154 | 4% | 1.9% | |
| Gladesville 2111 | 13 | 130 | 4% | 5.0% | |
| Abbotsford 2046 | 13 | 127 | 4% | 7.9% | |
| Glebe 2037 | 11 | 96 | 4% | 8.8% | |
| Lane Cove 2066 | 10 | 77 | 3% | 5.1% | |
| Ashfield 2131 | 9 | 117 | 3% | 2.0% | |
| West Ryde 2114 | 7 | 76 | 2% | 2.4% |
| Eastwood 2122 | 6 | 46 | 2% | 1.4% | |
| Ermington 2115 | 5 | 50 | 2% | 10.2% | |
| Five Dock 2046 | 5 | 40 | 2% | 3.9% | |
| Randwick 2031 | 5 | 30 | 2% | 0.6% | |
| Darlinghurst 2010 | 4 | 184 | 1% | 1.1% | |
| Epping 2121 | 4 | 98 | 1% | 1.4% | |
| Russell Lea 2046 | 4 | 53 | 1% | 6.2% | |
| Meadowbank 2114 | 4 | 69 | 1% | 4.8% | |
| Strathfield 2135 | 4 | 40 | 1% | 1.7% | |
| Wollstonecraft 2065 | 4 | 33 | 1% | 1.3% | |
| Marsfield 2122 | 3 | 152 | 1% | 2.3% | |
| Dulwich Hill 2203 | 3 | 37 | 1% | 1.4% | |
| Leichhardt 2040 | 3 | 39 | 1% | 1.5% | |
| Rose Bay 2029 | 3 | 30 | 1% | 0.6% | |
| Lane Cove North 2066 | 3 | 26 | 1% | 1.6% | |
| Wareemba 2046 | 3 | 16 | 1% | 10.0% | |
| Denistone 2114 | 3 | 17 | 1% | 5.1% | |
| Rozelle 2039 | 3 | 13 | 1% | 2.3% | |
| Clovelly 2031 | 3 | 12 | 1% | 2.0% | |
| Macquarie Park 2113 | 2 | 108 | 1% | 1.3% | |
| Chippendale 2008 | 2 | 122 | 1% | 2.5% | |
| Artarmon 2064 | 2 | 35 | 1% | 1.2% | |
| Croydon 2132 | 2 | 41 | 1% | 2.6% | |
| Balmain East 2041 | 2 | 38 | 1% | 5.3% | |
| Mortlake 2137 | 2 | 33 | 1% | 4.9% | |
| St Peters 2044 | 2 | 48 | 1% | 4.8% | |
| Kensington 2033 | 2 | 39 | 1% | 0.9% | |
| Lilyfield 2040 | 2 | 31 | 1% | 2.7% | |
| Balmain 2041 | 2 | 35 | 1% | 1.6% | |
| Alexandria 2015 | 2 | 22 | 1% | 1.1% | |
| Strathfield South 2136 | 2 | 24 | 1% | 5.0% | |
| Marrickville 2204 | 2 | 18 | 1% | 0.6% | |
| North Ryde 2113 | 2 | 17 | 1% | 1.5% | |
| North Parramatta 2151 | 2 | 19 | 1% | 0.7% | |
| Auburn 2144 | 2 | 17 | 1% | 0.4% | |
| Mortdale 2223 | 2 | 13 | 1% | 0.8% | |
| Canada Bay 2046 | 2 | 18 | 1% | 7.1% | |
| Lidcombe 2141 | 2 | 18 | 1% | 0.7% | |
| Melrose Park 2114 | 2 | 10 | 1% | 14.3% | |
| Maroubra 2035 | 2 | 10 | 1% | 0.3% | |
| Newtown 2042 | 2 | 9 | 1% | 1.4% | |
| Bellevue Hill 2023 | 2 | 8 | 1% | 0.5% | |
| Putney 2112 | 2 | 5 | 1% | 6.1% | |
| Regents Park 2143 | 1 | 50 | 0% | 2.1% | |
| Pyrmont 2009 | 1 | 34 | 0% | 0.9% | |
| Woolwich 2110 | 1 | 28 | 0% | 8.3% | |
| Chiswick 2046 | 1 | 24 | 0% | 2.4% | |
| Bondi 2026 | 1 | 24 | 0% | 0.3% | |
| Redfern 2016 | 1 | 21 | 0% | 0.8% | |
| Woollahra 2025 | 1 | 16 | 0% | 0.5% | |
| Chatswood 2067 | 1 | 16 | 0% | 0.3% | |
| Beecroft 2119 | 1 | 12 | 0% | 2.3% | |
| Eastlakes 2018 | 1 | 12 | 0% | 0.9% | |
| Lavender Bay 2060 | 1 | 12 | 0% | 2.6% | |
| Cronulla 2230 | 1 | 12 | 0% | 0.1% | |
| Thornleigh 2120 | 1 | 12 | 0% | 1.2% | |
| Forest Lodge 2037 | 1 | 11 | 0% | 2.6% | |
| Sans Souci 2219 | 1 | 11 | 0% | 0.4% | |
| Telopea 2117 | 1 | 10 | 0% | 1.1% | |
| Petersham 2049 | 1 | 10 | 0% | 1.0% | |
| Punchbowl 2196 | 1 | 9 | 0% | 0.4% | |
| Rosehill 2142 | 1 | 8 | 0% | 1.7% | |
| Cherrybrook 2126 | 1 | 8 | 0% | 0.8% | |
| East Ryde 2113 | 1 | 8 | 0% | 7.7% | |
| Lane Cove West 2066 | 1 | 8 | 0% | 3.7% | |
| Dundas Valley 2117 | 1 | 7 | 0% | 3.2% | |
| Rushcutters Bay 2011 | 1 | 6 | 0% | 1.2% | |
| Double Bay 2028 | 1 | 6 | 0% | 0.5% | |
| Dundas 2117 | 1 | 6 | 0% | 1.7% | |
| Mosman 2088 | 1 | 6 | 0% | 0.1% | |
| Merrylands 2160 | 1 | 6 | 0% | 0.2% | |
| Narwee 2209 | 1 | 6 | 0% | 1.1% | |
| South Wentworthville 2145 | 1 | 6 | 0% | 1.4% | |
| Baulkham Hills 2153 | 1 | 5 | 0% | 0.5% | |
| Port Hacking 2229 | 1 | 5 | 0% | 6.7% | |
| Homebush 2140 | 1 | 5 | 0% | 0.9% | |
| Summer Hill 2130 | 1 | 4 | 0% | 0.7% | |
| Cammeray 2062 | 1 | 4 | 0% | 0.3% | |
| Bondi Beach 2026 | 1 | 4 | 0% | 0.2% | |
| Gordon 2072 | 1 | 4 | 0% | 1.3% | |
| Paddington 2021 | 1 | 4 | 0% | 1.0% | |
| Crows Nest 2065 | 1 | 4 | 0% | 0.6% | |
| Gymea 2227 | 1 | 3 | 0% | 0.5% | |
| Brighton-Le-Sands 2216 | 1 | 3 | 0% | 0.5% | |
| Tennyson Point 2111 | 1 | 3 | 0% | 7.7% |
Tribunal & Court History
2
Total Cases
1
NCAT
2 cases on record. None resulted in adverse findings.
The applicant sought orders for tree removal and compensation for damage to their sewer and gutters. The tribunal decided the respondent must remove one tree but denied the compensation claims. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the respondent's trees caused the reported damage.
TREES (DISPUTES BETWEEN NEIGHBOURS) – Pt 2 application – neighbouring trees – damage to property – sewer pipe – no orders for compensation – orders to remove one tree
Before
Galwey AC
Hearing
20 January 2022
File Numbers
2021/228952
Matched Strata Plans
SP8412
Parties
Owners Corporation v Owners Corporation
Representation
Counsel: R Chen (Applicant) B Nesci (Solicitor) (Respondent) Solicitors: J S Mueller & Co (Applicant) Fazzini Lawyers and Consultants (Respondent)
Orders
The Court Orders: 1) The application is granted to the extent of the following orders. 2) The Respondent is to engage and pay for a suitably qualified arborist (minimum AQF level 3) with all appropriate insurances to remove Tree 2 (weeping fig) near the eastern boundary and to grind it stump to at least 200 mm below ground level or otherwise prevent its regrowth. These works are to be completed within 30 days of the date of these orders. Tree removal work is to be done in accordance with the...
An applicant appealed a previous decision regarding the repair of their living room floor and other issues. The tribunal refused to extend the time for appeal, refused leave to appeal and dismissed the appeal because the applicant did not meet the necessary requirements and had agreed in mediation not to raise the same issues again.
APPEAL - Notice of Appeal lodged more than 21 months late - No evidence provided to first instance hearing - Application breached mediation agreement
Before
G Ellis SC, Senior Member A Boxall, Senior Member
Hearing
On the papers
File Numbers
2022/00080634
Matched Strata Plans
SP4092
Parties
Lot Owner v Owners Corporation
Representation
Applicant (Self Represented) S Sadarangani (Respondent)
Orders
(1) The application for an extension of time is rejected. (2) Leave to appeal is refused. (3) The appeal is dismissed.
Google Reviews
04 Jan 2026
“Verdun Walsh Strata Management have been handling our Strata Plan for several years and I have always found them to be very helpful. No request is too small. Our Strata Manager, Joanne has always been extremely efficient and we appreciate it”
24 Nov 2025
“We recently switched to Verdun Walsh after being burned by our previous strata company.
Kelli has been responsive from day one and has provided the right guidance to help us work through the early stages properly.
If you’re dealing with a non-responsive strata manager who avoids...”
05 Aug 2025
“The first time that I have experience with the Strata Management and I am very impressed with the Verdun Walsh.
Joanne Bay is very supportive toward me and knowledgeable in her profession.
Also,
the best quality service No 1 & she gets the job DONE on the spot.
However, it is very important in...”
20 Dec 2025
“Joanne is always approachable, responsive and follows up. She has supported in a number of times over the past few years and her consistency is enduring. She is excellent.”
30 Sep 2025
“Verdun Walsh is always very professional and helpful to deal with, during dealings with Charlene, she is always kind and prompt to respond.”