Portfolio Profile
Lot Types
Residential 3,470 (76%)
Commercial 423 (9%)
Retirement 566 (12%)
Utility 117 (3%)
Other 1 (0%)
Scheme Size Distribution
Distribution of schemes by total lot count. Average scheme size: 18.7 lots. The portfolio is dominated by small schemes (10 lots or fewer), typical of townhouse and villa complexes.
Portfolio Age
Schemes by registration decade. Oldest scheme registered 1962, newest 2025.
Suburb Coverage
| Suburb | Schemes | Lots | % of Portfolio | Market Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drummoyne 2047 | 27 | 294 | 11% | 9.6% | |
| Woy Woy 2256 | 24 | 119 | 10% | 6.8% | |
| Hunters Hill 2110 | 14 | 542 | 6% | 9.6% | |
| Abbotsford 2046 | 10 | 73 | 4% | 6.1% | |
| Ashfield 2131 | 7 | 323 | 3% | 1.5% | |
| Umina Beach 2257 | 7 | 26 | 3% | 1.7% | |
| Gladesville 2111 | 6 | 63 | 2% | 2.3% | |
| Rozelle 2039 | 5 | 90 | 2% | 3.9% | |
| Blackwall 2256 | 5 | 22 | 2% | 7.8% | |
| Ettalong Beach 2257 | 5 | 22 | 2% | 1.4% |
| Ryde 2112 | 4 | 153 | 2% | 1.0% | |
| Guildford 2161 | 4 | 96 | 2% | 2.1% | |
| Gorokan 2263 | 4 | 104 | 2% | 4.5% | |
| Five Dock 2046 | 4 | 53 | 2% | 3.1% | |
| Canada Bay 2046 | 4 | 35 | 2% | 14.3% | |
| West Ryde 2114 | 4 | 24 | 2% | 1.4% | |
| Blacktown 2148 | 4 | 24 | 2% | 1.2% | |
| Toongabbie 2146 | 3 | 72 | 1% | 2.2% | |
| Homebush 2140 | 3 | 114 | 1% | 2.6% | |
| Enfield 2136 | 3 | 67 | 1% | 8.6% | |
| Marrickville 2204 | 3 | 70 | 1% | 0.9% | |
| Bondi Beach 2026 | 3 | 52 | 1% | 0.6% | |
| Prospect 2148 | 3 | 42 | 1% | 9.4% | |
| Balmain 2041 | 3 | 24 | 1% | 2.4% | |
| Petersham 2049 | 3 | 23 | 1% | 2.9% | |
| Wyoming 2250 | 3 | 24 | 1% | 5.6% | |
| Casula 2170 | 3 | 18 | 1% | 2.4% | |
| Leichhardt 2040 | 3 | 15 | 1% | 1.5% | |
| Long Jetty 2261 | 3 | 12 | 1% | 1.4% | |
| Mascot 2020 | 2 | 133 | 1% | 1.5% | |
| Strathfield South 2136 | 2 | 176 | 1% | 5.0% | |
| Oatlands 2117 | 2 | 84 | 1% | 4.3% | |
| Milperra 2214 | 2 | 134 | 1% | 7.4% | |
| Annandale 2038 | 2 | 19 | 1% | 1.9% | |
| Dulwich Hill 2203 | 2 | 32 | 1% | 1.0% | |
| Newtown 2042 | 2 | 21 | 1% | 1.4% | |
| Lakemba 2195 | 2 | 24 | 1% | 0.5% | |
| Wareemba 2046 | 2 | 21 | 1% | 6.7% | |
| Birchgrove 2041 | 2 | 19 | 1% | 5.7% | |
| East Gosford 2250 | 2 | 6 | 1% | 0.9% | |
| Canterbury 2193 | 1 | 276 | 0% | 1.0% | |
| Kogarah 2217 | 1 | 233 | 0% | 0.3% | |
| North Strathfield 2137 | 1 | 172 | 0% | 1.2% | |
| Sydney 2000 | 1 | 53 | 0% | 0.2% | |
| Niagara Park 2250 | 1 | 49 | 0% | 10.0% | |
| Auburn 2144 | 1 | 41 | 0% | 0.2% | |
| Epping 2121 | 1 | 39 | 0% | 0.3% | |
| Chatswood 2067 | 1 | 39 | 0% | 0.3% | |
| Campbelltown 2560 | 1 | 30 | 0% | 0.5% | |
| Darlinghurst 2010 | 1 | 26 | 0% | 0.3% | |
| Denistone 2114 | 1 | 26 | 0% | 1.7% | |
| Bexley 2207 | 1 | 24 | 0% | 0.3% | |
| Macquarie Park 2113 | 1 | 21 | 0% | 0.7% | |
| Forest Lodge 2037 | 1 | 21 | 0% | 2.6% | |
| Merrylands 2160 | 1 | 18 | 0% | 0.2% | |
| South Hurstville 2221 | 1 | 17 | 0% | 0.8% | |
| Homebush West 2140 | 1 | 16 | 0% | 0.7% | |
| Turramurra 2074 | 1 | 15 | 0% | 1.3% | |
| Arncliffe 2205 | 1 | 14 | 0% | 1.1% | |
| Bellevue Hill 2023 | 1 | 13 | 0% | 0.2% | |
| Rockdale 2216 | 1 | 13 | 0% | 0.5% | |
| Lane Cove 2066 | 1 | 11 | 0% | 0.5% | |
| Eastwood 2122 | 1 | 10 | 0% | 0.2% | |
| Lilyfield 2040 | 1 | 10 | 0% | 1.4% | |
| Alexandria 2015 | 1 | 9 | 0% | 0.5% | |
| North Parramatta 2151 | 1 | 9 | 0% | 0.3% | |
| Croydon Park 2133 | 1 | 8 | 0% | 0.8% | |
| Cessnock 2325 | 1 | 8 | 0% | 0.7% | |
| Russell Lea 2046 | 1 | 8 | 0% | 1.5% | |
| Kings Langley 2147 | 1 | 7 | 0% | 4.5% | |
| Silverwater 2128 | 1 | 7 | 0% | 1.6% | |
| Telopea 2117 | 1 | 6 | 0% | 1.1% | |
| Elizabeth Bay 2011 | 1 | 6 | 0% | 0.6% | |
| Gosford 2250 | 1 | 6 | 0% | 0.6% | |
| Belmore 2192 | 1 | 6 | 0% | 0.5% | |
| Tempe 2044 | 1 | 5 | 0% | 5.6% | |
| Naremburn 2065 | 1 | 4 | 0% | 1.0% | |
| Carlingford 2118 | 1 | 4 | 0% | 0.6% | |
| Fairfield 2165 | 1 | 4 | 0% | 0.4% | |
| Ourimbah 2258 | 1 | 4 | 0% | 1.2% | |
| Henley 2111 | 1 | 4 | 0% | 16.7% | |
| Pennant Hills 2120 | 1 | 4 | 0% | 1.6% | |
| The Entrance 2261 | 1 | 3 | 0% | 0.5% | |
| Booker Bay 2257 | 1 | 3 | 0% | 0.9% | |
| Putney 2112 | 1 | 2 | 0% | 3.0% | |
| Mcmahons Point 2060 | 1 | 2 | 0% | 1.2% | |
| Northbridge 2063 | 1 | 2 | 0% | 1.7% | |
| Avoca Beach 2251 | 1 | 2 | 0% | 0.8% | |
| Frenchs Forest 2086 | 1 | 2 | 0% | 1.8% |
Tribunal & Court History
4
Total Cases
4
NCAT
1.6
Adverse per 100 Schemes
1.6
Total per 100 Schemes
3
Compulsory Manager Appts
4 cases since 2022. Of these, 4 resulted in substantive orders (including 3 compulsory manager appointments). The remaining 0 were dismissed, withdrawn, settled, or involved the OC as applicant.
Orders Made 4
The Applicants, a strata management company and its sole director, sought review of disciplinary decisions made by the Commissioner for Fair Trading, which included license cancellation, reprimands, and disqualification. The Tribunal set aside the initial decisions, reprimanded Mr. Wang and cancelled his license, disqualified him from managing a business for 12 months, and reprimanded and fined the company, PSMG.
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – review of decision by external decision-maker, decision to cancel strata management agent’s licence – fine – company and individual licences and disqualify licence holder under the Property and Stock Agents Act 2002
Before
C Mulvey, Senior Member
Hearing
4 – 5 February 2025 Final submissions received 10 February 2025
File Numbers
2024/00273415
Matched Strata Plans
SP93087
Parties
Managing Agent v Government
Representation
Counsel: Mr J Horowitz (First and Second Applicants) Ms A Douglas-Baker (Respondent) Solicitors: Bannermans Lawyers (First and Second Applicants) Department of Customer Service (Respondent)
Orders
(1) The decisions under review are set aside. (2) Pursuant to s 192(1)(a) of the Property and Stock Agents Act 2002, Mr Whitney Wang is reprimanded. (3) Pursuant to s 192(1)(g) of the Property and Stock Agents Act 2002, Mr Whitney Wang’s licence is cancelled after 28 days from the date of this order. (4) Pursuant to s 192(1)(i) of the Property and Stock Agent Act 2002, Mr Whitney Wang is disqualified from being involved in the direction, management or conduct of the business of a licensee...
Lot owners sought an extension of the compulsory strata manager appointment. The tribunal previously appointed a compulsory strata manager. The tribunal extended the existing appointment of the strata manager and dismissed all cost applications, ordering each party to pay their own costs.
Compulsory manager appointed: Bright & Duggan Pty Limited for 4 months
COSTS – whether special circumstances – claim for costs made against the owners corporation which did not participate in the substantive proceedings.
Before
D Ziegler, Senior Member
Hearing
On the papers
File Numbers
SC 23/20818
Matched Strata Plans
SP93087
Parties
Lot Owner v Owners Corporation
Representation
Self-represented (Applicants) C Prestipino (First Respondent) Madison Marcus Law Firm (Second and subsequent Respondents)
Orders
(1) A hearing on the question of costs is dispensed with pursuant to s 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW). (2) The parties’ respective costs applications are dismissed. (3) Each party is to pay its own costs of and incidental to the proceedings.
Lot owners sought a fresh order for a compulsory strata manager for two years, or at least extend the current manager's appointment. The tribunal declined to appoint a new manager but extended the existing appointment of Bright & Duggan to manage the strata scheme until November 30, 2023 because of significant issues related to building defects and necessary repairs.
Compulsory manager appointed: Bright & Duggan Pty Ltd for 2 months
LAND LAW---Strata scheme---s 237 Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW)---Appointment of compulsory strata manager---Where compulsory strata manger already appointed---Whether circumstances justify a further appointment of compulsory strata manager---Whether circumstances justify extension of...
Before
D Ziegler, Senior Member
Hearing
19 July 2023
File Numbers
SC 23/20818
Matched Strata Plans
SP93087
Parties
Lot Owner v Owners Corporation
Representation
A Popovic (Applicants) No appearance (First respondent) Madison Marcus Law Firm (Second to 71st Respondent)
Orders
(1) Order 1 made on 10 January 2022 in SC 21/46495 is extended to 30 November 2023. (2) The application is otherwise dismissed. (3) If a party wishes to make a costs application, the costs applicant is to file and serve submissions and documents on the costs application by 14 days from the date of these orders. (4) If an application for costs is made by a party, the costs respondent is to file and serve submissions and documents on the costs application by 28 days from the date of these...
The applicant sought the appointment of a compulsory strata manager due to disputes and alleged failures in management. The Tribunal agreed, finding the scheme was not adequately managed. A compulsory strata manager was appointed for 18 months.
Compulsory manager appointed: Bright & Duggan Pty Ltd for 18 months
LAND LAW---Strata scheme---s 237 Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW)---Appointment of compulsory strata manager---Whether circumstances justify appointment of compulsory strata manager
Before
G. Sarginson, Senior Member
Hearing
14 December 2021
File Numbers
SC 21/46945
Matched Strata Plans
SP93087
Parties
Lot Owner v Owners Corporation
Representation
G. Grasso-Lay Advocate (Applicants) Counsel: M. Klooster (First Respondent-The Owners Strata Plan No 93087) Solicitors: CJ Boyd Solicitors (First Respondent)
Orders
(1) Bright & Duggan Pty Ltd is appointed as the strata managing agent of The Owners-Strata Plan No 93087 to exercise all the functions of the owners corporation and all the functions of the chairperson, secretary, treasurer and strata committee of the owners corporation under s 237 (1) (a) and (2) (a) of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW) for a period of 18 months from the date of the making of this order.