Portfolio Profile
Lot Types
Residential 5,452 (82%)
Commercial 760 (11%)
Utility 361 (5%)
Other 62 (1%)
Scheme Size Distribution
Distribution of schemes by total lot count. Average scheme size: 38.4 lots. The portfolio is dominated by small schemes (10 lots or fewer), typical of townhouse and villa complexes.
Portfolio Age
Schemes by registration decade. Oldest scheme registered 1964, newest 2025.
Suburb Coverage
| Suburb | Schemes | Lots | % of Portfolio | Market Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darling Point 2027 | 10 | 385 | 6% | 4.0% | |
| Elizabeth Bay 2011 | 7 | 329 | 4% | 4.5% | |
| Camperdown 2050 | 7 | 215 | 4% | 7.2% | |
| Mosman 2088 | 7 | 55 | 4% | 0.7% | |
| Sydney 2000 | 6 | 458 | 3% | 1.2% | |
| Gladesville 2111 | 5 | 204 | 3% | 1.9% | |
| Edgecliff 2027 | 5 | 210 | 3% | 6.6% | |
| Chippendale 2008 | 5 | 172 | 3% | 6.3% | |
| Randwick 2031 | 5 | 30 | 3% | 0.6% | |
| Roseville 2069 | 4 | 347 | 2% | 4.7% |
| Surry Hills 2010 | 4 | 171 | 2% | 1.6% | |
| Neutral Bay 2089 | 4 | 49 | 2% | 0.8% | |
| Miranda 2228 | 3 | 459 | 2% | 0.8% | |
| Lane Cove North 2066 | 3 | 178 | 2% | 1.6% | |
| Cremorne Point 2090 | 3 | 19 | 2% | 1.9% | |
| Erskineville 2043 | 2 | 445 | 1% | 2.7% | |
| Marrickville 2204 | 2 | 201 | 1% | 0.6% | |
| Hornsby 2077 | 2 | 200 | 1% | 0.5% | |
| Pyrmont 2009 | 2 | 152 | 1% | 1.8% | |
| Cremorne 2090 | 2 | 61 | 1% | 0.4% | |
| Botany 2019 | 2 | 52 | 1% | 1.3% | |
| Alexandria 2015 | 2 | 49 | 1% | 1.1% | |
| Maroubra 2035 | 2 | 36 | 1% | 0.3% | |
| Dulwich Hill 2203 | 2 | 39 | 1% | 1.0% | |
| Tuggerah 2259 | 2 | 36 | 1% | 2.2% | |
| Coogee 2034 | 2 | 27 | 1% | 0.3% | |
| Bondi Beach 2026 | 2 | 21 | 1% | 0.4% | |
| Bellevue Hill 2023 | 2 | 19 | 1% | 0.5% | |
| Potts Point 2011 | 2 | 17 | 1% | 1.0% | |
| Rose Bay 2029 | 2 | 21 | 1% | 0.4% | |
| Byron Bay 2481 | 2 | 11 | 1% | 0.4% | |
| Vaucluse 2030 | 2 | 11 | 1% | 0.8% | |
| Lennox Head 2478 | 2 | 6 | 1% | 0.4% | |
| Balgowlah 2093 | 2 | 5 | 1% | 0.5% | |
| Schofields 2762 | 1 | 405 | 1% | 1.3% | |
| Zetland 2017 | 1 | 188 | 1% | 1.1% | |
| North Ryde 2113 | 1 | 187 | 1% | 0.8% | |
| Milsons Point 2061 | 1 | 93 | 1% | 1.7% | |
| Croydon 2132 | 1 | 81 | 1% | 1.3% | |
| Merrylands 2160 | 1 | 73 | 1% | 0.2% | |
| Naremburn 2065 | 1 | 67 | 1% | 1.0% | |
| Glebe 2037 | 1 | 58 | 1% | 0.8% | |
| Campsie 2194 | 1 | 56 | 1% | 0.2% | |
| Blacktown 2148 | 1 | 54 | 1% | 0.3% | |
| Ashfield 2131 | 1 | 49 | 1% | 0.2% | |
| Lilyfield 2040 | 1 | 40 | 1% | 1.4% | |
| Gordon 2072 | 1 | 39 | 1% | 1.3% | |
| Balmain East 2041 | 1 | 36 | 1% | 2.6% | |
| Hurlstone Park 2193 | 1 | 36 | 1% | 1.8% | |
| Camden South 2570 | 1 | 33 | 1% | 9.1% | |
| Bayview 2104 | 1 | 32 | 1% | 10.0% | |
| Brighton-Le-Sands 2216 | 1 | 32 | 1% | 0.5% | |
| Petersham 2049 | 1 | 30 | 1% | 1.0% | |
| Epping 2121 | 1 | 27 | 1% | 0.3% | |
| Greenwich 2065 | 1 | 24 | 1% | 1.3% | |
| Rozelle 2039 | 1 | 22 | 1% | 0.8% | |
| Five Dock 2046 | 1 | 19 | 1% | 0.8% | |
| Dee Why 2099 | 1 | 18 | 1% | 0.2% | |
| Matraville 2036 | 1 | 17 | 1% | 0.7% | |
| Artarmon 2064 | 1 | 15 | 1% | 0.6% | |
| Brookvale 2100 | 1 | 14 | 1% | 0.7% | |
| St Peters 2044 | 1 | 13 | 1% | 2.4% | |
| Abbotsford 2046 | 1 | 13 | 1% | 0.6% | |
| Crows Nest 2065 | 1 | 13 | 1% | 0.6% | |
| Kiama 2533 | 1 | 12 | 1% | 0.5% | |
| Point Piper 2027 | 1 | 12 | 1% | 0.9% | |
| Blue Bay 2261 | 1 | 11 | 1% | 1.6% | |
| Curl Curl 2096 | 1 | 10 | 1% | 4.0% | |
| Tamarama 2026 | 1 | 9 | 1% | 1.2% | |
| Bondi 2026 | 1 | 9 | 1% | 0.3% | |
| Drummoyne 2047 | 1 | 8 | 1% | 0.4% | |
| Waverton 2060 | 1 | 8 | 1% | 0.8% | |
| Summer Hill 2130 | 1 | 8 | 1% | 0.7% | |
| Paddington 2021 | 1 | 7 | 1% | 1.0% | |
| Bogangar 2488 | 1 | 7 | 1% | 0.6% | |
| Clovelly 2031 | 1 | 6 | 1% | 0.7% | |
| Croydon Park 2133 | 1 | 6 | 1% | 0.8% | |
| Enmore 2042 | 1 | 5 | 1% | 3.2% | |
| Annandale 2038 | 1 | 5 | 1% | 1.0% | |
| Kingsford 2032 | 1 | 4 | 1% | 0.5% | |
| Wollstonecraft 2065 | 1 | 4 | 1% | 0.3% | |
| Mcmahons Point 2060 | 1 | 4 | 1% | 1.2% | |
| Kurraba Point 2089 | 1 | 4 | 1% | 0.5% | |
| Leichhardt 2040 | 1 | 4 | 1% | 0.5% | |
| Woollahra 2025 | 1 | 4 | 1% | 0.5% | |
| Queenscliff 2096 | 1 | 3 | 1% | 0.6% | |
| Fairlight 2094 | 1 | 3 | 1% | 0.4% | |
| Seaforth 2092 | 1 | 2 | 1% | 1.5% | |
| Double Bay 2028 | 1 | 2 | 1% | 0.5% | |
| Narrabeen 2101 | 1 | 2 | 1% | 0.5% | |
| Silverwater 2128 | 1 | 2 | 1% | 1.6% |
Tribunal & Court History
3
Total Cases
2
NCAT
1
Supreme Court
0.6
Adverse per 100 Schemes
1.7
Total per 100 Schemes
3 cases since 2021. Of these, 1 resulted in substantive orders. The remaining 2 were dismissed, withdrawn, settled, or involved the OC as applicant.
An owner applied for a compulsory strata manager appointment, which the tribunal granted. The respondent appealed, and the appeal panel set aside the original decision, finding insufficient reasons and incorrect onus of proof, remitting the matter for redetermination. Neither party sought costs in the appeal.
Compulsory manager sought but refused: The original order for a compulsory manager was set aside.
LAND LAW – Strata title – Appointment by Tribunal of strata managing agent pursuant to s 237 Strata Schemes Management Act – Relevant considerations APPEAL – Civil and Administrative Tribunal – Questions of law – Procedural fairness – Obligations of Tribunal to unrepresented litigant – Receipt...
Before
D Robertson, Principal Member L Andelman, Senior Member
Hearing
17 February 2025
File Numbers
2024/00385442
Matched Strata Plans
SP98770
Parties
Lot Owner v Lot Owner
Representation
Counsel: A Rizk (Appellant) Solicitors: Sachs Gerace Lawyers (Appellant) Dermot Maxwell (First Respondent) No appearance (Second Respondent)
Orders
(1) Appeal allowed. (2) The orders of the Consumer and Commercial Division of the Tribunal made on 23 September 2024 in proceedings 2024/00107957 are set aside. (3) The proceedings are remitted to the Consumer and Commercial Division of the Tribunal, differently constituted, for determination on the basis of such evidence as the parties may seek to rely upon.
An occupant sought orders to remove a strata committee member and stop a dog from causing a nuisance. The tribunal reviewed evidence, including noise recordings and witness statements. Ultimately, the tribunal dismissed the application, finding the evidence insufficient to support the claims.
LAND LAW – Strata title – Obligations of owners and occupiers – Keeping of pets – Nuisance – Whether barking of dog shown to constitute a nuisance or unreasonable interference with the enjoyment of another lot LAND LAW – Strata title – Owners corporation – Strata committee – Whether respondent...
Before
D Robertson, Senior Member
Hearing
16 October 2023
File Numbers
SC 23/13745
Matched Strata Plans
SP94579
Parties
Lot Owner v Lot Owner
Orders
(1) The application is dismissed.
The Owners Corp applied for continuation of a freezing order against the developer and an individual related to the developer, due to alleged building defects. The tribunal decided to extend the freezing order for four months, as the applicant had not yet provided sufficient evidence of the damages and the developer’s actions raised concerns that it would dissipate assets.
ASSET PRESERVATION ORDER – no issue of principle.
Before
Williams J
Hearing
30 July 2021
File Numbers
2021/97602
Matched Strata Plans
SP98970
Parties
Owners Corporation v Developer
Representation
Counsel: Mr J Knackstredt (Plaintiff) N/A (First Defendant) Mr F Hicks SC with Ms B Anderson (Second Defendant) Solicitors: Bannermans Lawyers (Plaintiff) N/A (First Defendant) Project Lawyers...
Orders
See orders at [54].
Google Reviews
18 Sep 2025
“We moved into a brand new complex of 163 units and have been very impressed by the chosen strata, Strata Republic, and in particular our Strata manager, Zach Maher.
Each meeting we have experienced, Zach has run the meeting in a very productive and professional manner.
He is also a very pleasant...”
17 Sep 2025
“We have recently moved into a strata apartment with Zach Maher as our Strata Manager working with Strata Republic. I have attended several of our strata meetings run each time by Zach and am impressed by his professionalism and ability to maintain a well run meeting often when emotions of owners...”
15 Nov 2024
“If you are looking for a Strata Manager for your building I highly recommend Strata Republic. I have worked with the whole team and in particular Paul Walker - an utmost dedicated and professional Strata Manager that goes above and beyond. The company is abreast of all strata related matters and...”
25 Mar 2025
“For anyone considering a Strata Manager for their building my experience with Paul Walker of Strata Republic (Paul is responsive and personable) has been very positive - if the rest of the Strata Republic team are reflective of that experience, you are in good hands with Strata Republic!”
18 Dec 2022
“Amelia Causer has been our appointed Strata Manager for the past few years and we could not be happier with the knowledge and assistance she provides in the management of our building. We have owned and invested in a number of strata titled apartments over the last three decades and have been...”