Portfolio Profile
Lot Types
Residential 9,320 (88%)
Commercial 1,094 (10%)
Retirement 116 (1%)
Utility 77 (1%)
Other 2 (0%)
Scheme Size Distribution
Distribution of schemes by total lot count. Average scheme size: 13.0 lots. The portfolio is dominated by small schemes (10 lots or fewer), typical of townhouse and villa complexes.
Portfolio Age
Schemes by registration decade. Oldest scheme registered 1964, newest 2024.
Suburb Coverage
| Suburb | Schemes | Lots | % of Portfolio | Market Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Port Macquarie 2444 | 516 | 5,656 | 63% | 41.8% | |
| Lake Cathie 2445 | 105 | 430 | 13% | 60.0% | |
| Laurieton 2443 | 46 | 241 | 6% | 52.9% | |
| Wauchope 2446 | 26 | 258 | 3% | 30.6% | |
| Forster 2428 | 14 | 192 | 2% | 2.4% | |
| Old Bar 2430 | 12 | 496 | 1% | 7.6% | |
| Black Head 2430 | 10 | 178 | 1% | 32.3% | |
| North Haven 2443 | 10 | 60 | 1% | 29.4% | |
| Crescent Head 2440 | 10 | 44 | 1% | 25.6% | |
| Taree 2430 | 9 | 71 | 1% | 3.9% |
| Tweed Heads 2485 | 7 | 2,154 | 1% | 1.2% | |
| Nambucca Heads 2448 | 7 | 184 | 1% | 6.7% | |
| Dunbogan 2443 | 5 | 22 | 1% | 71.4% | |
| Kingscliff 2487 | 4 | 92 | 0% | 1.1% | |
| West Kempsey 2440 | 4 | 116 | 0% | 17.4% | |
| Tuncurry 2428 | 4 | 26 | 0% | 1.1% | |
| Thrumster 2444 | 3 | 8 | 0% | 2.8% | |
| Yippin Creek 2446 | 3 | 7 | 0% | 25.0% | |
| Bellevue Hill 2023 | 2 | 40 | 0% | 0.5% | |
| Milsons Point 2061 | 2 | 16 | 0% | 3.4% | |
| Kempsey 2440 | 2 | 6 | 0% | 28.6% | |
| Hawks Nest 2324 | 2 | 8 | 0% | 1.7% | |
| Caringbah 2229 | 1 | 74 | 0% | 0.2% | |
| Coffs Harbour 2450 | 1 | 61 | 0% | 0.1% | |
| Banora Point 2486 | 1 | 54 | 0% | 0.2% | |
| Casuarina 2487 | 1 | 45 | 0% | 2.0% | |
| Kurraba Point 2089 | 1 | 16 | 0% | 0.5% | |
| Red Head 2430 | 1 | 16 | 0% | 20.0% | |
| Drummoyne 2047 | 1 | 8 | 0% | 0.4% | |
| South West Rocks 2431 | 1 | 6 | 0% | 0.5% | |
| Harrington 2427 | 1 | 5 | 0% | 1.8% | |
| Wingham 2429 | 1 | 4 | 0% | 3.1% | |
| West Haven 2443 | 1 | 4 | 0% | 7.1% | |
| Lakewood 2443 | 1 | 3 | 0% | 12.5% | |
| Boomerang Beach 2428 | 1 | 3 | 0% | 1.4% | |
| Grafton 2460 | 1 | 3 | 0% | 0.6% | |
| Ashtonfield 2323 | 1 | 2 | 0% | 2.9% |
Tribunal & Court History
2
Total Cases
1
NCAT
2 cases on record.
The applicants sought orders for the removal or maintenance of a tree on the respondents' property. The tribunal found that regular maintenance was reasonable and ordered the respondents to prune the tree every three years to prevent potential damage to the applicants' property.
TREES (DISPUTES BETWEEN NEIGHBOURS) – Pt 2 application – neighbouring tree – risk of damage – orders for regular pruning
Before
Galwey AC
Hearing
25 June 2025
File Numbers
2025/107411
Matched Strata Plans
SP16846
Parties
Lot Owner v Owners Corporation
Representation
Counsel: B Green (Self-represented) (First Applicant) J Green (Self-represented) (Second Applicant) M Sardelich (Agent) (Respondent)
Orders
The Court orders: (1) The application is granted to the extent of the following orders. (2) The respondents are to engage and pay for a suitably insured and qualified (minimum AQF level 3) arborist to prune the tree in August every three years, beginning in August 2025, as follows: (a) Remove any deadwood greater than 25 mm in diameter over the applicants’ property. (b) Remove branches that are less than 200 mm in diameter and are directly within one metre of the applicants’ dwelling’s wall...
The applicant owners sought repairs to address water ingress. The parties settled the matter and made consent orders for the repairs. The tribunal dismissed the owners corporation's application for costs, finding no justification for a costs order after settlement.
COSTS – settlement of proceedings – circumstances in which a costs order should be made where proceedings settle – no circumstances justifying departing from the position that costs will not usually be awarded where proceedings are settled.
Before
M Harrowell, Deputy President
Hearing
On the papers
File Numbers
SC 21/44336
Matched Strata Plans
SP19378
Parties
Lot Owner v Owners Corporation
Representation
Counsel: K Roser, Counsel (Applicants) V Butcher, Solicitor (Respondent) Solicitors: Stephen Pratt Lawyer (Applicants) Vincent Butcher Lawyers (Respondent)
Orders
The application for costs is dismissed.
Google Reviews
26 Feb 2025
“Strata Professionals is one of the most organised strata firms I have dealt with. Enquiries are always well communicated, handled thoroughly and prompt. Not to mention every team member has been lovely.”
07 Jul 2025
“Thank you Trudi for being an amazing Strata Manager for all of us at Port Sea handling everything in a professional and patient manner. :)”
06 Mar 2025
“Julie Pentek is probably the best property manager I’ve ever dealt with.”
06 Feb 2026
“Professionals Strata Team has provided excellent services. Everytime I email or call, they response and offer solutions efficiently. Last week one of my flyscreens dropped downstairs when I did cleaning, Vaish (the assistant strata manager) helped get it collected and returned. Very grateful...”
15 Jul 2025
“We’ve had an incredibly positive experience with PST. In Sydney’s often unpredictable and unreliable strata industry, it’s a huge relief to find a team that is not only professional but also genuinely cares about their clients.
They are extremely responsive, always quick to return calls and...”