#283
of 459 Managers
18
Total Schemes
229
Total Lots
12.7
Avg Lots / Scheme
89%
AGM Compliance (avg 68%)

Portfolio Profile

Lot Types

Residential 152 (66%) Commercial 70 (31%) Utility 7 (3%)

Scheme Size Distribution

8
1-10
7
11-25
3
26-50
0
51-100
0
100+

Distribution of schemes by total lot count. Average scheme size: 12.7 lots. The portfolio is dominated by small schemes (10 lots or fewer), typical of townhouse and villa complexes.

Portfolio Age

2
1960s
5
1970s
5
1990s
3
2000s
1
2010s
2
2020s

Schemes by registration decade. Oldest scheme registered 1966, newest 2023.

Suburb Coverage

Suburb Schemes Lots % of Portfolio Market Share
Punchbowl 2196 3 40 17% 1.3%
Lansvale 2166 2 60 11% 28.6%
Greenacre 2190 2 32 11% 1.2%
Bankstown 2200 1 16 6% 0.2%
Narwee 2209 1 14 6% 1.1%
Condell Park 2200 1 13 6% 0.6%
Yagoona 2199 1 12 6% 0.9%
Wiley Park 2195 1 11 6% 0.5%
Strathfield South 2136 1 9 6% 2.5%
Leumeah 2560 1 6 6% 1.4%
Lakemba 2195 1 6 6% 0.3%
Belmore 2192 1 4 6% 0.5%
Wetherill Park 2164 1 3 6% 1.0%
Liverpool 2170 1 3 6% 0.2%

Tribunal & Court History

1
Total Cases
1
NCAT

1 case on record. None resulted in adverse findings.

NCAT Dismissed Low [2021] NSWCATCD 105 2021-10-06
Mr. Zhang, a lot owner, sought interim orders, which were dismissed. The tribunal considered a cost application from the respondent but decided against a cost order. As a result, each party must cover their own expenses.
COSTS — Strata Schemes — Application for interim orders dismissed — Whether special circumstances — Whether any special circumstances warrant costs order
Before
G Sarginson, Senior Member
Hearing
On the papers
File Numbers
SC 21/17244
Matched Strata Plans
SP10579
Parties
Lot Owner v Lot Owner
Representation
Solicitors: Weinberger Lawyers (Other party)
Orders
(1) An oral hearing on the issue of costs is dispensed with under s 50 (2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW). (2) The costs application in Matter SC 21/17244 is dismissed. (3) No order for costs is made in Matter SC 21/17244 on the basis that each party should bear its own costs of Matter SC 21/17244 in accordance with Section 60 (1) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW).

Read full decision →

Google Reviews

5 ★ Azim K. 30 Jan 2026
“I have been dealing with Silvestro, as our dedicated Strata Manager, at Elite Strata over the past 12 months or so and it is clear to me that he is very good at what he does leveraging his extensive experience and knowledge in Strata Management industry. He is very responsive and pro-active and...”
5 ★ Steven Messini 20 Dec 2025
“Elite Strata provides exceptional, proactive service. Their team is highly professional, ensuring our building remains well-maintained and compliant. Communication is consistently clear and timely, making complex strata issues easy to resolve. It is refreshing to work with a management company...”
5 ★ Sash 20 Nov 2025
“Silvestro from Elite Strata has demonstrated exceptional experience and professionalism. He and his team effectively resolved an issue I had with the intercom, delivering outstanding results. Thank you very much for the successful outcome.”
5 ★ Stan Silver 15 Dec 2025
“As a new home owner Elite Strata has been very responsive. Aira has been very helpful regarding the queries I have had. So far I’m appreciating the level of support from this Stata company. I’ll be very happy if it continues this way!”
5 ★ Stephina Lunardi 12 Feb 2026
“Best Strata Management company I have come across thus far. As part of a Committee, a proactive and knowledgeable team is what you want, and they are it.”