Portfolio Profile
Lot Types
Residential 362 (100%)
Scheme Size Distribution
Distribution of schemes by total lot count. Average scheme size: 21.3 lots. Most schemes fall in the 11–25 lot range, typical of small apartment blocks.
Portfolio Age
Schemes by registration decade. Oldest scheme registered 1977, newest 2009.
Suburb Coverage
| Suburb | Schemes | Lots | % of Portfolio | Market Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tweed Heads 2485 | 6 | 65 | 35% | 1.0% | |
| Tweed Heads South 2486 | 4 | 160 | 24% | 2.0% | |
| Banora Point 2486 | 4 | 81 | 24% | 0.7% | |
| Tweed Heads West 2485 | 2 | 52 | 12% | 0.7% | |
| Casuarina 2487 | 1 | 4 | 6% | 2.0% |
Google Reviews
11 Dec 2025
“I worked with SCMS-Strata for many years in my early days as Secretary/Treasurer of our complex. They taught me so much about legislation and how to interpret it correctly. Their knowledge of the law and their commitment to adhering to it made every decision clear and consistent — there was...”
14 Aug 2025
“Super helpful in pointing me in the right direction and with making sure I knew what legal processes had to be followed to make sure our Body Corporate was compliant. Would highly recommend. Have dealt with other companies and they are by far the most knowledgeable I've dealt with.”
11 Feb 2025
“(Zero stars) The most difficult people I’ve ever dealt with. The opposite to helpful, extremely hard to get hold of, incompetent, expensive, and to top it off they send ridiculous threatening letters to the committee and then charge them for it. They make it hard to leave by being unavailable,...”
19 Mar 2025
“As a lawyer it’s really refreshing to find a company that understands the law and has a thorough knowledge of what is legally required for a strata plan to operate properly. Great response time and highly recommend”
09 Jun 2022
“Our very small body corporate have now, eventually, been able to leave SCMS Strata. We had two years of complete and utter unprofessional conduct from them. They gave incorrect legal information. They were totally biased with one owner. After refusing to release our records and funds we had to...”