Result Property Group Pty Ltd
Result Property Group Pty Ltd manages around 200 strata schemes totalling 8,600 lots across NSW. With an average of around 47 lots per scheme, it specialises in larger buildings — more than double the state-wide average of around 20 lots. It has a broad geographic spread across 83 suburbs, with Double Bay as its largest market (5%). Its schemes have been involved in 5 tribunal and court decisions since 2021, none of which resulted in adverse findings.
Counts (~) are rounded figures sourced from the NSW StrataHub register. Figures may include duplication in staged or mixed-use developments and reflect data at the time of the last register extract.
Portfolio
94% residential
SCA NSW
Not listed
Fair Trading
✓ Not on register
Scheme Decisions
5 in portfolio since 2021
Portfolio Profile
Lot Types
Residential 94%
Commercial 2%
Utility 3%
Other 0%
Scheme Size Distribution
Distribution of schemes by total lot count. Average scheme size: 47.0 lots. Most schemes fall in the 11–25 lot range, typical of small apartment blocks.
Portfolio Age
Schemes by registration decade. Oldest scheme registered 1961, newest 2024.
Suburb Coverage
| Suburb | Schemes | Lots | % of Portfolio | Market Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Double Bay 2028 | 9 | 191 | 5% | 4.2% | |
| Coogee 2034 | 9 | 115 | 5% | 1.4% | |
| Elizabeth Bay 2011 | 7 | 337 | 4% | 4.8% | |
| Zetland 2017 | 6 | 1,286 | 3% | 6.9% | |
| Darlinghurst 2010 | 6 | 710 | 3% | 2.4% | |
| Kensington 2033 | 5 | 174 | 3% | 2.3% | |
| Carlton 2218 | 5 | 107 | 3% | 2.6% | |
| Cronulla 2230 | 5 | 74 | 3% | 0.6% | |
| Woollahra 2025 | 5 | 56 | 3% | 2.6% | |
| Sydney 2000 | 4 | 437 | 2% | 0.9% |
| Wolli Creek 2205 | 4 | 489 | 2% | 6.1% | |
| North Sydney 2060 | 4 | 156 | 2% | 1.7% | |
| Bondi 2026 | 4 | 59 | 2% | 1.3% | |
| Bellevue Hill 2023 | 4 | 28 | 2% | 1.0% | |
| Rosebery 2018 | 3 | 711 | 2% | 3.6% | |
| Centennial Park 2021 | 3 | 165 | 2% | 5.7% | |
| Potts Point 2011 | 3 | 73 | 2% | 1.5% | |
| Darling Point 2027 | 3 | 49 | 2% | 1.2% | |
| Monterey 2217 | 3 | 56 | 2% | 2.6% | |
| Lindfield 2070 | 3 | 75 | 2% | 2.9% | |
| Hurstville 2220 | 3 | 35 | 2% | 0.6% | |
| Rose Bay 2029 | 3 | 24 | 2% | 0.7% | |
| Pyrmont 2009 | 2 | 234 | 1% | 1.9% | |
| Bondi Junction 2022 | 2 | 270 | 1% | 1.1% | |
| Wentworth Point 2127 | 2 | 264 | 1% | 3.6% | |
| The Entrance 2261 | 2 | 226 | 1% | 0.9% | |
| Matraville 2036 | 2 | 160 | 1% | 1.3% | |
| Sylvania Waters 2224 | 2 | 168 | 1% | 18.2% | |
| Drummoyne 2047 | 2 | 89 | 1% | 0.7% | |
| Rockdale 2216 | 2 | 71 | 1% | 1.1% | |
| Waterloo 2017 | 2 | 114 | 1% | 1.8% | |
| Abbotsford 2046 | 2 | 114 | 1% | 1.2% | |
| St Ives 2075 | 2 | 74 | 1% | 1.6% | |
| Turramurra 2074 | 2 | 51 | 1% | 2.7% | |
| Marrickville 2204 | 2 | 44 | 1% | 0.6% | |
| Cremorne 2090 | 2 | 48 | 1% | 0.4% | |
| Roselands 2196 | 2 | 34 | 1% | 2.1% | |
| Mascot 2020 | 2 | 25 | 1% | 1.6% | |
| Bondi Beach 2026 | 2 | 16 | 1% | 0.4% | |
| Eastlakes 2018 | 2 | 18 | 1% | 1.7% | |
| Cammeray 2062 | 2 | 19 | 1% | 0.7% | |
| Randwick 2031 | 2 | 12 | 1% | 0.2% | |
| Mosman 2088 | 2 | 11 | 1% | 0.2% | |
| Chippendale 2008 | 1 | 173 | 1% | 1.3% | |
| Milsons Point 2061 | 1 | 163 | 1% | 1.7% | |
| Jannali 2226 | 1 | 89 | 1% | 1.1% | |
| Wollstonecraft 2065 | 1 | 68 | 1% | 0.3% | |
| Brighton-Le-Sands 2216 | 1 | 60 | 1% | 0.5% | |
| Rooty Hill 2766 | 1 | 45 | 1% | 1.3% | |
| Leichhardt 2040 | 1 | 36 | 1% | 0.5% | |
| Alexandria 2015 | 1 | 33 | 1% | 0.6% | |
| Lane Cove 2066 | 1 | 33 | 1% | 0.5% | |
| Surry Hills 2010 | 1 | 33 | 1% | 0.4% | |
| Botany 2019 | 1 | 29 | 1% | 0.7% | |
| Newtown 2042 | 1 | 27 | 1% | 0.7% | |
| Caringbah 2229 | 1 | 26 | 1% | 0.2% | |
| Arncliffe 2205 | 1 | 25 | 1% | 1.1% | |
| Kogarah 2217 | 1 | 24 | 1% | 0.3% | |
| Waverley 2024 | 1 | 22 | 1% | 1.2% | |
| Glebe 2037 | 1 | 18 | 1% | 0.8% | |
| Henley 2111 | 1 | 17 | 1% | 14.3% | |
| Granville 2142 | 1 | 15 | 1% | 0.5% | |
| Camperdown 2050 | 1 | 14 | 1% | 1.0% | |
| Sans Souci 2219 | 1 | 14 | 1% | 0.4% | |
| Allawah 2218 | 1 | 14 | 1% | 0.6% | |
| Lilyfield 2040 | 1 | 14 | 1% | 1.3% | |
| Beverly Hills 2209 | 1 | 13 | 1% | 1.0% | |
| Kirribilli 2061 | 1 | 12 | 1% | 0.5% | |
| Campsie 2194 | 1 | 12 | 1% | 0.2% | |
| Artarmon 2064 | 1 | 10 | 1% | 0.6% | |
| Punchbowl 2196 | 1 | 10 | 1% | 0.3% | |
| Revesby 2212 | 1 | 9 | 1% | 0.6% | |
| Castle Hill 2154 | 1 | 8 | 1% | 0.3% | |
| Bexley 2207 | 1 | 8 | 1% | 0.3% | |
| Maroubra 2035 | 1 | 7 | 1% | 0.2% | |
| Menai 2234 | 1 | 7 | 1% | 1.4% | |
| Rushcutters Bay 2011 | 1 | 6 | 1% | 1.2% | |
| Neutral Bay 2089 | 1 | 6 | 1% | 0.2% | |
| Bronte 2024 | 1 | 6 | 1% | 0.6% | |
| Hillsdale 2036 | 1 | 6 | 1% | 0.5% | |
| Clovelly 2031 | 1 | 6 | 1% | 0.7% | |
| Belmore 2192 | 1 | 6 | 1% | 0.5% | |
| Peakhurst 2210 | 1 | 4 | 1% | 0.5% |
Tribunal & Court History
5
Scheme Decisions
4
NCAT
1
Supreme Court
0.0
Manager Adverse / 100
2.7
Total per 100 Schemes
5 tribunal or court decisions in managed schemes since 2021. In none of these was Result Property Group Pty Ltd named as a party — all involved schemes they manage. No adverse findings against the manager.
Orders Made 3
Dismissed 2
Common property 1
By-law enforcement 1
Building defects 1
A developer sought permission to rely on a cross-claim filed out of time, related to building defects. The tribunal allowed the cross-claim to proceed, but ordered each party to bear their own costs. The ruling acknowledged procedural irregularities, but found no significant prejudice to the opposing party.
CIVIL PROCEDURE — Pleadings — Where r 9.1(1) of Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) has not been complied with — Application of s 63 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) — Where applicant seeks that cross summons and cross list statement be taken, nunc pro tunc, to have been validly filed...
Before
Ball J
Hearing
2 April 2024
File Numbers
2019/398986
Matched Strata Plans
SP88565
Parties
Developer v Third Party
Representation
Counsel: M Sheldon (Cross-Claimant on Third Cross-Claim | Applicant) A Shearer (First Cross Defendant to Third Cross-Claim | First Respondent) Solicitors: King and Wood Mallesons (Cross-Claimant...
Orders
(1) Order pursuant to section 63 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) excusing the second defendant’s failure to obtain an order to serve the third cross-summons and cross list statement, with the effect that the third cross-summons and cross list statement are taken, nunc pro tunc, to have been: (a) validly filed on 24 July 2023; and (b) validly served on the first cross-defendant to the third cross claim and the second cross defendant to the third cross claim on 18 January 2024. (2) The...
A lot owner applied to the tribunal because a pergola built by a neighbor didn't comply with a by-law. The tribunal decided the Owners Corporation needed to enforce the by-law by requiring the neighbor to modify the pergola and also to clean a common property wall.
LAND LAW — Strata title — Common property — By-laws
Before
M Deane, Senior Member
Hearing
17 February 2023
File Numbers
SC22/39017
Matched Strata Plans
SP11045
Parties
Lot Owner v Owners Corporation
Representation
Solicitors: Applicant (self-represented) Bannerman Lawyers (First respondent) No appearance for second respondent
Orders
(1) The Owners – Strata Plan No 11045 is to take all necessary steps to require the owner of Lot 31 to comply with Special By-law 14; that is, by requiring the owner of Lot 31 to reduce the height of the pergola to 2.7 metres measured from the concrete surface of the courtyard to Lot 31. (2) The Owners – Strata Plan No 11045 is to comply with order 1 within 6 months of the date of these orders. (3) The Owners – Strata Plan No 11045 is to arrange for the cleaning of the wall above the pergola...
Tectonic Pools Pty Ltd sued the owners for unpaid work on a swimming pool. The Tribunal found in favor of Tectonic, but deducted from the amount owed due to defective tiling. The owners were ordered to pay the remaining balance and further orders were to be provided in respect of interest.
BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION — Defects claim – oral agreement – implied term
Before
S Thode, Senior Member
Hearing
13 and 14 September 2021 Submissions Close 5 November 2021
File Numbers
HB 20/38644 HB 20/33001 HB 21/09594
Matched Strata Plans
SP85338
Parties
Third Party v Lot Owner
Representation
Counsel: B Le Leplastrier (J and S Ochudzawa) B Anderson (M Lepagier) Solicitors: Sommerville Legal (J and S Ochudzawa) Fortis Law Group (M Lepagier) Williamson Lawyers (Tectonic Pools Pty Ltd)
Orders
(1) In proceedings HB 21/09594 [Ochudzawa v Lepagier]. The application is dismissed. (2) In HB 20/38644 [Tectonic Pools Pty Ltd v Ochudzawa] the respondents Joanna Ochudzawa and Simon Ochudzawa are to pay $38,206.36 to Tectonic Pools Pty Ltd immediately. (3) In HB 20/33001 [Lepagier v Ochudzawa] Joanna Ochudzawa and Simon Ochudzawa are to pay $45,583.24 to Mirco Lepagier immediately. (4) Any application for costs is to be made in writing to the Tribunal (with a copy sent to the other party)...
Ms. Balogh sought $24,000 for alleged delays in completing internal repairs. The tribunal decided that Ms. Balogh was not a party to the home building contract and dismissed the application. The decision was based on the applicant's lack of contractual nexus to the work being performed.
BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION — Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) — Residential building work — contractual breach — Delay
Before
G Bassett, General Member
Hearing
20 August 2021
File Numbers
HB 21/26281
Matched Strata Plans
SP3755
Parties
Lot Owner v Third Party
Representation
Applicants (Self represented) S Denny (Second Respondent) G Jardine (Third Respondent) Counsel: M Gan (First Respondent)
Orders
The application is dismissed
The applicant (appellant) sought to overturn a previous order to pay for defective building work. The tribunal upheld the original decision, with a minor reduction in the amount payable. The tribunal ordered the appellant to pay the respondent's costs.
COSTS – No issue of principle
Before
G Blake AM SC, Senior Member D Robertson, Senior Member
Hearing
On the papers
File Numbers
2020/00370582 (AP 20/01565)
Matched Strata Plans
SP85338
Parties
Third Party v Owners Corporation
Representation
Solicitors: D C Balog & Associates (Appellant) DEA Lawyers (Respondent)
Orders
1. A hearing in respect of costs is dispensed with. 2. The appellant is to pay the respondent’s costs of the appeal as agreed or assessed.
Frequently Asked Questions
- How many strata schemes does Result Property Group Pty Ltd manage in NSW?
- Result Property Group Pty Ltd manages around 200 strata schemes (around 8,600 total lots) across 83 suburbs in New South Wales, based on the NSW StrataHub register.
- What areas does Result Property Group Pty Ltd provide strata management in?
- Result Property Group Pty Ltd is most active in Double Bay, Coogee, Elizabeth Bay, covering 83 suburbs across NSW in total.
- Does Result Property Group Pty Ltd specialise in residential or commercial strata?
- Result Property Group Pty Ltd manages primarily residential (94% residential, 2% commercial).
- What is the average scheme size managed by Result Property Group Pty Ltd?
- Result Property Group Pty Ltd manages schemes averaging 47 lots each, compared to the NSW state average of approximately 20 lots per scheme.
- Is Result Property Group Pty Ltd a member of Strata Community Association (SCA) NSW?
- Based on the SCA NSW online directory, Result Property Group Pty Ltd does not appear as a current member.
- Does Result Property Group Pty Ltd have any NSW Fair Trading enforcement actions?
- Result Property Group Pty Ltd does not appear on the NSW Fair Trading Name and Shame Register, indicating no recorded enforcement actions as of our last data update.
- How many NCAT or court cases involve schemes managed by Result Property Group Pty Ltd?
- 5 tribunal or court cases involving schemes managed by Result Property Group Pty Ltd appear in NSW caselaw records since 2021.
- What is Result Property Group Pty Ltd's NSW strata management licence number?
- Result Property Group Pty Ltd's NSW licence number is 1644403, issued under the Property and Stock Agents Act 2002.