Result Property Group Pty Ltd

Licence 1644403 220 schemes 9,522 lots 92 suburbs

Result Property Group Pty Ltd manages 220 strata schemes totalling 9,522 lots across NSW. With an average of 43 lots per scheme, it specialises in larger buildings — more than double the state-wide average of 20 lots. It has a broad geographic spread across 92 suburbs, with Double Bay as its largest market (5%). AGM compliance of 42% is below the state-wide average of 70% and may warrant attention from lot owners. There are 5 recorded tribunal or court decisions involving its schemes (4 at NCAT, 1 in the Supreme Court). Of these, 3 resulted in orders being made and 2 were dismissed.

#68
of 459 Managers
220
Total Schemes
9,522
Total Lots
92
Suburbs Served
43.3
Avg Lots / Scheme
42%
AGM Compliance (avg 70%)

Portfolio Profile

Lot Types

Residential 8,957 (94%) Commercial 252 (3%) Utility 278 (3%) Other 35 (0%)

Scheme Size Distribution

61
1-10
67
11-25
38
26-50
27
51-100
27
100+

Distribution of schemes by total lot count. Average scheme size: 43.3 lots. Most schemes fall in the 11–25 lot range, typical of small apartment blocks.

Portfolio Age

23
1960s
31
1970s
30
1980s
41
1990s
56
2000s
30
2010s
9
2020s

Schemes by registration decade. Oldest scheme registered 1961, newest 2024.

Suburb Coverage

Suburb Schemes Lots % of Portfolio Market Share
Double Bay 2028 10 197 5% 4.7%
Coogee 2034 10 135 5% 1.5%
Elizabeth Bay 2011 9 417 4% 5.7%
Zetland 2017 6 1,286 3% 6.7%
Darlinghurst 2010 6 710 3% 1.7%
North Sydney 2060 6 234 3% 2.4%
Woollahra 2025 6 66 3% 3.1%
Sydney 2000 5 445 2% 1.0%
Kensington 2033 5 174 2% 2.3%
Carlton 2218 5 107 2% 2.7%
Cronulla 2230 5 74 2% 0.6%
Bellevue Hill 2023 5 39 2% 1.2%
Wolli Creek 2205 4 489 2% 6.1%
Rushcutters Bay 2011 4 72 2% 4.7%
Bondi 2026 4 59 2% 1.3%
Lindfield 2070 4 100 2% 3.9%
Rosebery 2018 3 711 1% 3.3%
The Entrance 2261 3 242 1% 1.4%
Centennial Park 2021 3 165 1% 5.6%
Waterloo 2017 3 171 1% 2.5%
Abbotsford 2046 3 171 1% 1.8%
Bondi Beach 2026 3 57 1% 0.6%
Potts Point 2011 3 73 1% 1.5%
Darling Point 2027 3 49 1% 1.2%
Monterey 2217 3 56 1% 2.6%
Marrickville 2204 3 61 1% 0.9%
Hurstville 2220 3 35 1% 0.6%
Mascot 2020 3 39 1% 2.3%
Rose Bay 2029 3 24 1% 0.6%
Pyrmont 2009 2 234 1% 1.8%
Bondi Junction 2022 2 270 1% 1.0%
Wentworth Point 2127 2 264 1% 3.4%
Matraville 2036 2 160 1% 1.3%
Sylvania Waters 2224 2 168 1% 20.0%
Drummoyne 2047 2 89 1% 0.7%
Wollstonecraft 2065 2 137 1% 0.7%
Kogarah 2217 2 92 1% 0.6%
Rockdale 2216 2 71 1% 1.1%
St Ives 2075 2 74 1% 1.6%
Surry Hills 2010 2 77 1% 0.8%
Turramurra 2074 2 51 1% 2.6%
Alexandria 2015 2 39 1% 1.1%
Newtown 2042 2 31 1% 1.4%
Cremorne 2090 2 48 1% 0.4%
Roselands 2196 2 34 1% 2.2%
Beverly Hills 2209 2 31 1% 2.2%
Eastlakes 2018 2 18 1% 1.7%
Cammeray 2062 2 19 1% 0.7%
Peakhurst 2210 2 13 1% 1.0%
Maroubra 2035 2 11 1% 0.3%
Clovelly 2031 2 12 1% 1.4%
Randwick 2031 2 12 1% 0.2%
Mosman 2088 2 11 1% 0.2%
Chippendale 2008 1 173 0% 1.3%
Milsons Point 2061 1 163 0% 1.7%
Jannali 2226 1 89 0% 1.1%
Neutral Bay 2089 1 69 0% 0.2%
Brighton-Le-Sands 2216 1 60 0% 0.5%
Rooty Hill 2766 1 45 0% 1.3%
Redfern 2016 1 42 0% 0.8%
Wollongong 2500 1 40 0% 0.1%
Penrith 2750 1 38 0% 0.2%
Leichhardt 2040 1 36 0% 0.5%
Botany 2019 1 29 0% 0.6%
Arncliffe 2205 1 25 0% 1.1%
Norwest 2153 1 25 0% 1.5%
Waverley 2024 1 22 0% 1.2%
Petersham 2049 1 20 0% 1.0%
Glebe 2037 1 18 0% 0.8%
Henley 2111 1 17 0% 16.7%
Granville 2142 1 15 0% 0.5%
Lilyfield 2040 1 14 0% 1.4%
Camperdown 2050 1 14 0% 1.0%
Sans Souci 2219 1 14 0% 0.4%
Allawah 2218 1 14 0% 0.6%
Campsie 2194 1 12 0% 0.2%
Kirribilli 2061 1 12 0% 0.5%
Punchbowl 2196 1 10 0% 0.4%
Artarmon 2064 1 10 0% 0.6%
Revesby 2212 1 9 0% 0.5%
Bexley 2207 1 8 0% 0.3%
Castle Hill 2154 1 8 0% 0.4%
Menai 2234 1 7 0% 1.3%
Belmore 2192 1 6 0% 0.5%
Bronte 2024 1 6 0% 0.6%
Hillsdale 2036 1 6 0% 0.5%
The Rocks 2000 1 6 0% 4.0%
Collaroy 2097 1 4 0% 0.6%
Crows Nest 2065 1 4 0% 0.6%
Balmain East 2041 1 3 0% 2.6%
Thirroul 2515 1 3 0% 0.8%
Gordon 2072 1 2 0% 1.3%

Contact & Reviews

NSW Licence (Verified)

Licensee Result Property Group Pty Ltd
Status Current
Licence Number 1644403
Type Property - Corporation
Granted 2010-07-23
Expires 2030-07-22
ACN 141658344
Registered Address KINGSGROVE NSW 2208

Tribunal & Court History

5
Total Cases
4
NCAT
1
Supreme Court
1.4
Adverse per 100 Schemes
2.3
Total per 100 Schemes

5 cases since 2021. Of these, 3 resulted in substantive orders. The remaining 2 were dismissed, withdrawn, settled, or involved the OC as applicant.

3
2
Orders Made 3 Dismissed 2
$38,206 Total Compensation
Common property 1 By-law enforcement 1 Building defects 1
Supreme Court Orders Made Medium Adverse [2024] NSWSC 396 2024-04-17
A developer sought permission to rely on a cross-claim filed out of time, related to building defects. The tribunal allowed the cross-claim to proceed, but ordered each party to bear their own costs. The ruling acknowledged procedural irregularities, but found no significant prejudice to the opposing party.
CIVIL PROCEDURE — Pleadings — Where r 9.1(1) of Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) has not been complied with — Application of s 63 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) — Where applicant seeks that cross summons and cross list statement be taken, nunc pro tunc, to have been validly filed...
Before
Ball J
Hearing
2 April 2024
File Numbers
2019/398986
Matched Strata Plans
SP88565
Parties
Developer v Third Party
Representation
Counsel: M Sheldon (Cross-Claimant on Third Cross-Claim | Applicant) A Shearer (First Cross Defendant to Third Cross-Claim | First Respondent) Solicitors: King and Wood Mallesons (Cross-Claimant...
Orders
(1) Order pursuant to section 63 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) excusing the second defendant’s failure to obtain an order to serve the third cross-summons and cross list statement, with the effect that the third cross-summons and cross list statement are taken, nunc pro tunc, to have been: (a) validly filed on 24 July 2023; and (b) validly served on the first cross-defendant to the third cross claim and the second cross defendant to the third cross claim on 18 January 2024. (2) The...

Read full decision →

NCAT Orders Made Medium Adverse [2023] NSWCATCD 31 2023-03-31
A lot owner applied to the tribunal because a pergola built by a neighbor didn't comply with a by-law. The tribunal decided the Owners Corporation needed to enforce the by-law by requiring the neighbor to modify the pergola and also to clean a common property wall.
Common propertyBy-law enforcement
LAND LAW — Strata title — Common property — By-laws
Before
M Deane, Senior Member
Hearing
17 February 2023
File Numbers
SC22/39017
Matched Strata Plans
SP11045
Parties
Lot Owner v Owners Corporation
Representation
Solicitors: Applicant (self-represented) Bannerman Lawyers (First respondent) No appearance for second respondent
Orders
(1) The Owners – Strata Plan No 11045 is to take all necessary steps to require the owner of Lot 31 to comply with Special By-law 14; that is, by requiring the owner of Lot 31 to reduce the height of the pergola to 2.7 metres measured from the concrete surface of the courtyard to Lot 31. (2) The Owners – Strata Plan No 11045 is to comply with order 1 within 6 months of the date of these orders. (3) The Owners – Strata Plan No 11045 is to arrange for the cleaning of the wall above the pergola...

Read full decision →

NCAT Dismissed High [2022] NSWCATCD 57 2022-01-31
Tectonic Pools Pty Ltd sued the owners for unpaid work on a swimming pool. The Tribunal found in favor of Tectonic, but deducted from the amount owed due to defective tiling. The owners were ordered to pay the remaining balance and further orders were to be provided in respect of interest.
$38,206 Compensation
BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION — Defects claim – oral agreement – implied term
Before
S Thode, Senior Member
Hearing
13 and 14 September 2021 Submissions Close 5 November 2021
File Numbers
HB 20/38644 HB 20/33001 HB 21/09594
Matched Strata Plans
SP85338
Parties
Third Party v Lot Owner
Representation
Counsel: B Le Leplastrier (J and S Ochudzawa) B Anderson (M Lepagier) Solicitors: Sommerville Legal (J and S Ochudzawa) Fortis Law Group (M Lepagier) Williamson Lawyers (Tectonic Pools Pty Ltd)
Orders
(1) In proceedings HB 21/09594 [Ochudzawa v Lepagier]. The application is dismissed. (2) In HB 20/38644 [Tectonic Pools Pty Ltd v Ochudzawa] the respondents Joanna Ochudzawa and Simon Ochudzawa are to pay $38,206.36 to Tectonic Pools Pty Ltd immediately. (3) In HB 20/33001 [Lepagier v Ochudzawa] Joanna Ochudzawa and Simon Ochudzawa are to pay $45,583.24 to Mirco Lepagier immediately. (4) Any application for costs is to be made in writing to the Tribunal (with a copy sent to the other party)...

Read full decision →

NCAT Dismissed Low [2021] NSWCATCD 102 2021-10-15
Ms. Balogh sought $24,000 for alleged delays in completing internal repairs. The tribunal decided that Ms. Balogh was not a party to the home building contract and dismissed the application. The decision was based on the applicant's lack of contractual nexus to the work being performed.
Building defects
BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION — Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) — Residential building work — contractual breach — Delay
Before
G Bassett, General Member
Hearing
20 August 2021
File Numbers
HB 21/26281
Matched Strata Plans
SP3755
Parties
Lot Owner v Third Party
Representation
Applicants (Self represented) S Denny (Second Respondent) G Jardine (Third Respondent) Counsel: M Gan (First Respondent)
Orders
The application is dismissed

Read full decision →

NCAT Orders Made Medium Adverse [2021] NSWCATAP 122 2021-05-06
The applicant (appellant) sought to overturn a previous order to pay for defective building work. The tribunal upheld the original decision, with a minor reduction in the amount payable. The tribunal ordered the appellant to pay the respondent's costs.
COSTS – No issue of principle
Before
G Blake AM SC, Senior Member D Robertson, Senior Member
Hearing
On the papers
File Numbers
2020/00370582 (AP 20/01565)
Matched Strata Plans
SP85338
Parties
Third Party v Owners Corporation
Representation
Solicitors: D C Balog & Associates (Appellant) DEA Lawyers (Respondent)
Orders
1. A hearing in respect of costs is dispensed with. 2. The appellant is to pay the respondent’s costs of the appeal as agreed or assessed.

Read full decision →

Data sourced from the NSW StrataHub public register. Result Property Group Pty Ltd is 1 of 459 strata managers tracked by Compare Strata. Browse all managers or find managers by suburb.