Portfolio Profile
Lot Types
Residential 4,289 (83%)
Commercial 754 (15%)
Utility 135 (3%)
Scheme Size Distribution
Distribution of schemes by total lot count. Average scheme size: 69.0 lots. The portfolio leans toward mid-size schemes, common in suburban apartment developments.
Portfolio Age
Schemes by registration decade. Oldest scheme registered 1964, newest 2024.
Suburb Coverage
| Suburb | Schemes | Lots | % of Portfolio | Market Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cronulla 2230 | 17 | 276 | 23% | 1.9% | |
| Sydney 2000 | 12 | 564 | 16% | 2.4% | |
| Macquarie Park 2113 | 5 | 200 | 7% | 3.4% | |
| Forest Lodge 2037 | 4 | 661 | 5% | 10.5% | |
| Barangaroo 2000 | 3 | 951 | 4% | 50.0% | |
| Zetland 2017 | 3 | 322 | 4% | 3.4% | |
| Milsons Point 2061 | 3 | 228 | 4% | 5.2% | |
| Mosman 2088 | 3 | 24 | 4% | 0.3% | |
| Haymarket 2000 | 2 | 205 | 3% | 3.6% | |
| Darlinghurst 2010 | 2 | 56 | 3% | 0.6% |
| Sydney Olympic Park 2127 | 1 | 364 | 1% | 6.2% | |
| Kirrawee 2232 | 1 | 327 | 1% | 0.3% | |
| Rosebery 2018 | 1 | 186 | 1% | 1.1% | |
| Leichhardt 2040 | 1 | 122 | 1% | 0.5% | |
| North Sydney 2060 | 1 | 114 | 1% | 0.4% | |
| Gladesville 2111 | 1 | 110 | 1% | 0.4% | |
| Alexandria 2015 | 1 | 80 | 1% | 0.5% | |
| Rouse Hill 2155 | 1 | 72 | 1% | 2.0% | |
| Heathcote 2233 | 1 | 56 | 1% | 1.7% | |
| Wentworth Point 2127 | 1 | 54 | 1% | 1.7% | |
| Sutherland 2232 | 1 | 40 | 1% | 0.4% | |
| Guildford 2161 | 1 | 39 | 1% | 0.5% | |
| St Peters 2044 | 1 | 35 | 1% | 2.4% | |
| Miranda 2228 | 1 | 24 | 1% | 0.3% | |
| Wombarra 2515 | 1 | 16 | 1% | 20.0% | |
| Caringbah 2229 | 1 | 15 | 1% | 0.2% | |
| Sans Souci 2219 | 1 | 10 | 1% | 0.4% | |
| Glebe 2037 | 1 | 10 | 1% | 0.8% | |
| Marrickville 2204 | 1 | 9 | 1% | 0.3% | |
| Point Piper 2027 | 1 | 6 | 1% | 0.9% | |
| Caringbah South 2229 | 1 | 2 | 1% | 0.3% |
Tribunal & Court History
2
Total Cases
2 cases on record.
The Owners – Strata Plan 1998 sought orders to give effect to a strata renewal plan. The tribunal ruled in favor of the Owners, finding the plan met the necessary statutory requirements and ordering the dissenting owners to sell their lots to the developer and the strata plan to be terminated after completion of the contracts. The tribunal also ordered the developer to pay the Owners' costs.
LAND LAW – strata title – strata renewal plan for redevelopment – s 182 of the Strata Schemes Development Act 2015 (NSW) – objections by dissenting owners – whether relationship existed between owner of lots and developer – strata renewal plan given effect – costs as agreed
Before
Duggan J
Hearing
03 February 2026
File Numbers
2025/00266986
Matched Strata Plans
SP1998
Parties
Owners Corporation v Developer
Representation
Counsel: G Farland and M Keene (Applicant) J McKelvey and L Nurpuri (First Respondent) F Berglund (Second Respondent) Solicitors: Bannermans Lawyers (Applicant) Corrs Chambers Westgarth (First...
Orders
See orders at [98]
An applicant sought to replace existing foreshore stairs and restore a sandstone cliff. The tribunal decided to uphold the appeal and grant development consent, which was agreed upon by the parties. This decision was based on various considerations including environmental and planning regulations.
DEVELOPMENT APPEAL – alterations and additions – foreshore access stairs – landscape development standard - orders
Before
Espinosa C
Hearing
Conciliation Conference 23 January 2023, 6 February 2023, 8 February 2023, 3 March 2023, and 22 March 2023
File Numbers
2022/288402
Matched Strata Plans
SP831
Parties
Third Party v Government
Representation
Counsel: D Loether (Solicitor)(Applicant) J Amy (Solicitor)(Respondent) Solicitors: Bartier Perry (Applicant) Sutherland Shire Council (Respondent)
Orders
The Court orders that: (1) The Applicant shall pay the Respondent’s costs thrown away as a result of the Amendment of the development application pursuant to section 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, as agreed or as assessed. (2) The Applicant’s written request prepared by Avenue Town Planning dated 14 March 2023, pursuant to clause 4.6 of the Sutherland Shire Local Environmental Plan 2015, to vary the landscaping areas development standard in clause 6.14 of the...
Google Reviews
11 Dec 2025
“After serving as Chair of our Strata Committee and having worked with two previous strata management companies, I had almost resigned myself to believing that finding a consistently professional, proactive and highly knowledgeable strata manager was a pipe dream. That changed the moment we moved...”
27 Nov 2025
“I attended a strata meeting recently where James Patsis ran it and I can say it was a positive one. He consistently acts in the best interests of the building and its residents. Having dealt with many strata managers before him, I can honestly say he is the most diligent I’ve worked with.
James...”
03 Dec 2025
“We came on board with Premium Strata this year and it has been a great experience so far, largely thanks to the professionalism, responsiveness, and genuine care shown by Marulie Dulay and Ben He.
The team is incredibly organised and proactive, communicating clearly, following through on every...”
10 Dec 2025
“Premium Strata Manager Marulie has always been efficient and easy to engage with. She and her team communicate clearly, respond promptly, and handle matters professionally. Overall, working with her has been a smooth and reliable experience. Kudos!”
18 Sep 2025
“I had a wonderful experience with Carina from Premium Strata. She is incredibly attentive and always goes above and beyond to assist with my inquiries. Her responses were prompt and thorough. I truly appreciate her professionalism and dedication. It was a pleasure dealing with Carina, thank you...”