#301
of 459 Managers
11
Total Schemes
734
Total Lots
66.7
Avg Lots / Scheme
73%
AGM Compliance (avg 68%)

Portfolio Profile

Lot Types

Residential 632 (86%) Commercial 102 (14%)

Scheme Size Distribution

3
1-10
2
11-25
1
26-50
2
51-100
3
100+

Distribution of schemes by total lot count. Average scheme size: 66.7 lots. The portfolio is dominated by small schemes (10 lots or fewer), typical of townhouse and villa complexes.

Portfolio Age

1
1960s
1
1970s
1
1980s
2
1990s
6
2000s

Schemes by registration decade. Oldest scheme registered 1964, newest 2004.

Suburb Coverage

Suburb Schemes Lots % of Portfolio Market Share
Balmain 2041 4 433 36% 3.1%
Sydney 2000 2 102 18% 0.4%
Queenscliff 2096 1 123 9% 0.6%
Drummoyne 2047 1 37 9% 0.4%
Alexandria 2015 1 18 9% 0.5%
Bellevue Hill 2023 1 12 9% 0.2%
Darling Point 2027 1 9 9% 0.4%

Tribunal & Court History

1
Total Cases

1 case on record. None resulted in adverse findings.

Land & Environment Dismissed Low [2021] NSWLEC 1632 2021-10-22
The applicant sought consent to remove a tree. The tribunal dismissed the appeal, as the applicant applied under the wrong permit and a development application was required. The council had previously denied consent for one tree but allowed the removal of another.
TREE REMOVAL APPLICATION – appeal against Council’s determination – proximity of tree to building – whether reasons for refusal were reasonable – development consent required to remove a tree – applicant did not apply for development consent – applicant acted on advice from Council
Before
Galwey AC
Hearing
20 July 2021; 1 October 2021
File Numbers
2021/60688
Matched Strata Plans
SP21804
Parties
Owners Corporation v Government
Representation
Counsel: M McNamara (Agent) (Applicant) S Turner (Solicitor) (Respondent) Solicitors: Inner West Council (Respondent)
Orders
The Court orders that: (1) The appeal is dismissed. (2) Application TREE/2020/0724 to remove two trees at 16 Vincent Street, Balmain is determined by way of refusal of consent to remove Tree 1 and granting of consent to remove Tree 2. (3) The exhibits are returned except for A and 1.

Read full decision →