Portfolio Profile
Lot Types
Residential 783 (77%)
Commercial 15 (1%)
Utility 214 (21%)
Scheme Size Distribution
Distribution of schemes by total lot count. Average scheme size: 14.2 lots. The portfolio is dominated by small schemes (10 lots or fewer), typical of townhouse and villa complexes.
Portfolio Age
Schemes by registration decade. Oldest scheme registered 1961, newest 2013.
Suburb Coverage
| Suburb | Schemes | Lots | % of Portfolio | Market Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bondi Beach 2026 | 25 | 533 | 35% | 5.1% | |
| North Bondi 2026 | 10 | 89 | 14% | 3.2% | |
| Rose Bay 2029 | 7 | 68 | 10% | 1.5% | |
| Tamarama 2026 | 7 | 58 | 10% | 8.3% | |
| Bellevue Hill 2023 | 4 | 43 | 6% | 1.0% | |
| Clovelly 2031 | 3 | 18 | 4% | 2.0% | |
| Paddington 2021 | 2 | 72 | 3% | 2.0% | |
| Bondi 2026 | 2 | 45 | 3% | 0.7% | |
| Darling Point 2027 | 2 | 12 | 3% | 0.8% | |
| Coogee 2034 | 2 | 13 | 3% | 0.3% |
| Randwick 2031 | 2 | 19 | 3% | 0.2% | |
| Woollahra 2025 | 1 | 12 | 1% | 0.5% | |
| Vaucluse 2030 | 1 | 10 | 1% | 0.4% | |
| Waverley 2024 | 1 | 8 | 1% | 1.2% | |
| Queens Park 2022 | 1 | 6 | 1% | 3.0% | |
| Double Bay 2028 | 1 | 4 | 1% | 0.5% |
Tribunal & Court History
2
Total Cases
2
NCAT
2 cases on record.
A lot owner sought orders regarding a dividing fence with the neighboring lot owner. The tribunal determined that the existing fence was insufficient, ordering its demolition and replacement with the cost shared, and also addressing cleaning and painting of the adjacent wall.
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING — Fences and boundaries — “Dividing fence”
Before
R Collins, Senior Member
Hearing
29 April 2025
File Numbers
2024/331924
Matched Strata Plans
SP11097
Parties
Lot Owner v Lot Owner
Representation
Counsel: Farrell (applicant) Hanscomb (respondent) Solicitors: Marsdens Law Group –(respondent)
Orders
(1) The parties are to jointly engage a contractor to demolish section A and Section B of the masonry wall as identified in the survey prepared by Beyond Measure Surveys dated 16 December 2024 within 60 days of these orders and remove all debris and vegetation on the line of the existing fence and cavity floor. The cost is to be shared equally between the parties. (2) The applicant may remove all remnant moss, debris and vegetation on its external house wall adjacent to Sections A and B,...
An applicant sought to appeal an interlocutory decision related to a dividing fence and related masonry wall. The tribunal decided to refuse leave to appeal and dismiss the appeal, finding no legal error in the initial decision and that it was fair and equitable. The tribunal ordered each party to bear their own costs of the appeal.
APPEALS – Appeal from interlocutory decision to grant of leave to amend claim – leave refused
Before
G Ellis SC, Senior Member J Redfern, Senior Member
Hearing
17 December 2024
File Numbers
2024/00431096
Matched Strata Plans
SP11097
Parties
Third Party v Third Party
Representation
Solicitors: A Sinclair (Applicant) O Johnstone (Agent) (Respondent)
Orders
(1) Leave to appeal is refused. (2) The appeal is otherwise dismissed. (3) Each party is to bear their own costs of the appeal.
Google Reviews
15 Dec 2024
“As a trades person working with coyle and everett for the past few years. We appreciate how well they coordinate with the trades in organising work to be carried out, I have seen first hand how professional and prompt the team is dealing with emergency and issues. I would be happy to recommend...”
11 Jun 2025
“Happy to highly recommend Coye & Everett, who are a pleasure to deal with. Particular thanks to Marcus who is on top of every issue, super efficient and extremely personable!”
05 Jan 2023
“Where to begin? If I would give 0 stars I could.
2 years we had an issue with the oven and it was never looked into despite numerous requests.
The property manager Marcus was always too busy to get a hold of when it mattered, they tried to charge through the nose for wear and tear even though...”
10 Aug 2020
“There is a reason these agents have a 2 star rating. PLEASE take your business elsewhere. The service is absolutely horrendous!! You will 100% regret using these agents. You deserve better and will certainly come to regret any involvement with this business.
We were strung along for 2 weeks by...”
16 Jul 2020
“If i could give 0 stars I would.
Me and my partner applied for one of coyle and Everett's apartments and it took them 2 weeks to tell us the apllication was unsuccessful. During these 2 weeks they told us we were the only applicant and that they just needed our managers and current landlord to...”