Alldis & Cox (Coogee) Pty Ltd
Alldis & Cox (Coogee) Pty Ltd manages around 450 strata schemes totalling 7,500 lots across NSW. Its average scheme size of around 16 lots is below the state-wide average of around 20, indicating a lean towards smaller developments. It has a broad geographic spread across 53 suburbs, with Coogee as its largest market (18%). It manages a significant number of retirement lots (18% of its portfolio), alongside 58% residential. Its schemes have been involved in 4 tribunal and court decisions since 2021, none of which resulted in adverse findings.
Counts (~) are rounded figures sourced from the NSW StrataHub register. Figures may include duplication in staged or mixed-use developments and reflect data at the time of the last register extract.
Portfolio
58% residential
SCA NSW
✓ Member
Fair Trading
✓ Not on register
Scheme Decisions
4 in portfolio since 2021
Portfolio Profile
Lot Types
Residential 58%
Commercial 5%
Retirement 18%
Utility 12%
Other 6%
Scheme Size Distribution
Distribution of schemes by total lot count. Average scheme size: 15.8 lots. The portfolio is dominated by small schemes (10 lots or fewer), typical of townhouse and villa complexes.
Portfolio Age
Schemes by registration decade. Oldest scheme registered 1962, newest 2024.
Suburb Coverage
| Suburb | Schemes | Lots | % of Portfolio | Market Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coogee 2034 | 84 | 773 | 18% | 12.6% | |
| Randwick 2031 | 82 | 879 | 17% | 10.1% | |
| Bellevue Hill 2023 | 28 | 184 | 6% | 6.8% | |
| Rose Bay 2029 | 24 | 237 | 5% | 5.3% | |
| Maroubra 2035 | 22 | 175 | 5% | 4.0% | |
| Kensington 2033 | 20 | 152 | 4% | 9.1% | |
| Bondi Beach 2026 | 19 | 226 | 4% | 3.9% | |
| Bronte 2024 | 18 | 209 | 4% | 10.1% | |
| Clovelly 2031 | 18 | 101 | 4% | 12.5% | |
| Darling Point 2027 | 12 | 243 | 3% | 4.8% |
| Neutral Bay 2089 | 10 | 2,352 | 2% | 2.1% | |
| Kingsford 2032 | 10 | 126 | 2% | 4.7% | |
| Double Bay 2028 | 9 | 85 | 2% | 4.2% | |
| Waverley 2024 | 9 | 85 | 2% | 10.5% | |
| Potts Point 2011 | 8 | 228 | 2% | 4.0% | |
| Bondi 2026 | 8 | 114 | 2% | 2.6% | |
| Vaucluse 2030 | 7 | 47 | 1% | 2.0% | |
| Woollahra 2025 | 6 | 63 | 1% | 3.2% | |
| North Bondi 2026 | 6 | 47 | 1% | 2.0% | |
| Bondi Junction 2022 | 6 | 59 | 1% | 3.2% | |
| Point Piper 2027 | 6 | 56 | 1% | 5.7% | |
| Sydney 2000 | 4 | 129 | 1% | 0.9% | |
| Edgecliff 2027 | 4 | 69 | 1% | 5.4% | |
| Hillsdale 2036 | 4 | 33 | 1% | 2.0% | |
| Darlinghurst 2010 | 3 | 102 | 1% | 1.2% | |
| Balmain 2041 | 3 | 78 | 1% | 2.4% | |
| Eastlakes 2018 | 3 | 36 | 1% | 2.6% | |
| South Coogee 2034 | 3 | 37 | 1% | 6.2% | |
| Queens Park 2022 | 3 | 23 | 1% | 8.8% | |
| Banksmeadow 2019 | 3 | 20 | 1% | 9.1% | |
| Mascot 2020 | 3 | 24 | 1% | 2.4% | |
| Paddington 2021 | 2 | 186 | 0% | 2.0% | |
| Waterloo 2017 | 2 | 51 | 0% | 1.8% | |
| Centennial Park 2021 | 2 | 22 | 0% | 3.8% | |
| Tamarama 2026 | 2 | 8 | 0% | 2.4% | |
| Matraville 2036 | 2 | 8 | 0% | 1.3% | |
| Avoca Beach 2251 | 2 | 12 | 0% | 1.6% | |
| Woolloomooloo 2011 | 2 | 10 | 0% | 2.6% | |
| Pagewood 2035 | 1 | 79 | 0% | 7.7% | |
| Chatswood 2067 | 1 | 40 | 0% | 0.3% | |
| Mcmahons Point 2060 | 1 | 20 | 0% | 1.1% | |
| Glebe 2037 | 1 | 19 | 0% | 0.8% | |
| Elizabeth Bay 2011 | 1 | 18 | 0% | 0.7% | |
| Beaconsfield 2015 | 1 | 7 | 0% | 5.3% | |
| Dover Heights 2030 | 1 | 6 | 0% | 1.0% | |
| St Marys 2760 | 1 | 6 | 0% | 0.3% | |
| Watsons Bay 2030 | 1 | 6 | 0% | 4.0% | |
| Cremorne 2090 | 1 | 4 | 0% | 0.2% | |
| Northbridge 2063 | 1 | 4 | 0% | 1.8% | |
| Surry Hills 2010 | 1 | 4 | 0% | 0.4% | |
| Malabar 2036 | 1 | 3 | 0% | 2.4% | |
| Alexandria 2015 | 1 | 3 | 0% | 0.6% | |
| Ashfield 2131 | 1 | 3 | 0% | 0.2% |
Tribunal & Court History
4
Scheme Decisions
3
NCAT
0.0
Manager Adverse / 100
0.8
Total per 100 Schemes
4 tribunal or court decisions in managed schemes since 2021. In none of these was Alldis & Cox (Coogee) Pty Ltd named as a party — all involved schemes they manage. No adverse findings against the manager.
Lot owners sought an order requiring other lot owners to address alleged unauthorized works, but the application was dismissed due to the applicants' lack of standing. The Tribunal on appeal found the original decision-making process was flawed, denying the applicants a fair hearing.
APPEALS — appeal from order dismissing application — withdrawal of application — Tribunal made error as to jurisdiction — breach of procedural fairness — utility of appeal
Before
E Bishop SC, Senior Member H Woods, Senior Member
Hearing
29 July 2025
File Numbers
2025/00116328
Matched Strata Plans
SP62
Parties
Lot Owner v Lot Owner
Representation
Appellants (Self-Represented) Solicitors: Bannermans Lawyers (Respondents)
Orders
(1) The appeal is allowed. (2) The orders made by the Tribunal in 2024/00432941 on 28 February 2025 are set aside. (3) The parties are to provide any written submissions in respect of the appeal from the costs decision dated 30 May 2025 within 21 days of the date of these orders and are to notify the registry whether the appeal from the costs decision can be dealt with on the papers.
A lot owner sought compensation from the Owners Corporation for costs associated with water damage and subsequent repairs to the unit. The Tribunal found in favor of the applicant, ordering the Owners Corporation to pay an additional amount to the applicant after an earlier payment. The Tribunal also made orders for the determination of costs.
REAL PROPERTY – STRATA MANAGEMENT – incidence and content of owners corporation’s strict duty to maintain and repair common property – meaning of maintain and repair - lot owner’s claim for alleged damage from alleged breach of duty and reimbursement for works to common property – owners...
Before
G K Burton SC, Senior Member
Hearing
19 September 2025
File Numbers
2024/00195987
Matched Strata Plans
SP2004
Parties
Lot Owner v Owners Corporation
Representation
Counsel: Mr I Chatterjee (applicant) Mr M Forgacs (respondent) Solicitors: Grace Lawyers (applicant) J S Mueller & Co, Lawyers (respondent)
Orders
(1) Note that the applicant has received from the respondent prior to hearing $38,801.25 of the amount originally claimed, without further contest in the proceedings. (2) Order that The Owners – Strata Plan No 2004 pay Oberto Pty Ltd $24,354.90 on or before 22 December 2025. (3) Order, in respect of costs (determination of which was deferred until after delivery of substantive decision) and definition of parties: 1 Any party’s application for costs and submissions, any further evidence in...
TREES (DISPUTES BETWEEN NEIGHBOURS) – Pt 2 application – damage caused by neighbouring tree – whether the tree has damaged the applicant’s property – whether the tree must be removed to prevent further damage – whether the respondent is fully aware of the proceedings – whether the tree is...
Matched Strata Plans
SP21340
The applicant sought to transfer proceedings to the District Court due to apprehended bias, related to a witness who was a tribunal member. The tribunal decided to dismiss the application to transfer the proceedings. The reason for dismissal was that the tribunal found no evidence of error in the original decision regarding the transfer.
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Bias – apprehended bias – interest or association bias – Member of Tribunal providing lay and expert evidence in support of a claim brought by his domestic partner in proceedings in the Tribunal – application to transfer proceedings to a court pursuant to Sch 4 cl 6 of the...
Before
M Harrowell, Deputy President A Bell SC, Senior Member
Hearing
20 April 2021
File Numbers
2021/00065930
Matched Strata Plans
SP4159
Parties
Owners Corporation v Lot Owner
Representation
Counsel: N Li (Appellant) Solicitors: Kerin Benson Lawyers (Appellant) JS Mueller and Co Lawyers (Respondent)
Orders
(1) Leave to appeal is granted. (2) The appeal is dismissed.
Frequently Asked Questions
- How many strata schemes does Alldis & Cox (Coogee) Pty Ltd manage in NSW?
- Alldis & Cox (Coogee) Pty Ltd manages around 450 strata schemes (around 7,500 total lots) across 53 suburbs in New South Wales, based on the NSW StrataHub register.
- What areas does Alldis & Cox (Coogee) Pty Ltd provide strata management in?
- Alldis & Cox (Coogee) Pty Ltd is most active in Coogee, Randwick, Bellevue Hill, covering 53 suburbs across NSW in total.
- Does Alldis & Cox (Coogee) Pty Ltd specialise in residential or commercial strata?
- Alldis & Cox (Coogee) Pty Ltd manages primarily residential (58% residential lots).
- What is the average scheme size managed by Alldis & Cox (Coogee) Pty Ltd?
- Alldis & Cox (Coogee) Pty Ltd manages schemes averaging 16 lots each, compared to the NSW state average of approximately 20 lots per scheme.
- Is Alldis & Cox (Coogee) Pty Ltd a member of Strata Community Association (SCA) NSW?
- Yes, Alldis & Cox (Coogee) Pty Ltd is a member of Strata Community Association (SCA) NSW.
- Does Alldis & Cox (Coogee) Pty Ltd have any NSW Fair Trading enforcement actions?
- Alldis & Cox (Coogee) Pty Ltd does not appear on the NSW Fair Trading Name and Shame Register, indicating no recorded enforcement actions as of our last data update.
- How many NCAT or court cases involve schemes managed by Alldis & Cox (Coogee) Pty Ltd?
- 4 tribunal or court cases involving schemes managed by Alldis & Cox (Coogee) Pty Ltd appear in NSW caselaw records since 2021.
- What is Alldis & Cox (Coogee) Pty Ltd's NSW strata management licence number?
- Alldis & Cox (Coogee) Pty Ltd's NSW licence number is 105044, issued under the Property and Stock Agents Act 2002.